Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Lance Armstrong reaction round-up: Conflicting views from cycling and beyond as Texan gets back in saddle despite ban

Meanwhile, senior official from France's anti-doping agency claims Armstrong was warned of doping controls...

Stars of cycling and other sports as well as sponsors have been reacting to news of Lance Armstrong’s life ban from sport and disqualification from all results since August 1998. However, the man who won the Tour de France an unprecedented seven times is still riding, finishing second in a local mountain bike race in Colorado yesterday. Meanwhile, a senior official at France’s national anti-doping agency has claimed that Armstrong was able to evade doping controls after being forewarned of them.

"Nobody needs to cry for me. I'm going to be great," insisted Armstrong after being beaten by 16-year-old Keegan Swirbul at the Power of Four race in Aspen, Colorado, where he has a home.

He was riding in the event less than 48 hours after confirming that he did not intend to go to arbitration to fight the five separate doping counts he had been charged with by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA).

The agency confirmed on Friday that it had banned him from sport for life and was stripping him of all competitive results obtained dating back to 1 August 1998, including his seven Tour de France victories.

The 40-year-old was able to take part in yesterday’s mountain bike race because its organisers are not bound by the provisions of the World Anti-Doping Code (WADC). He is banned from competing in any event organised by a signatory to the WADC, or any member of such an organisation.

Among those who have commented on Armstrong’s case are the three men still alive who have each won the Tour de France five times, a record only the Texan himself eclipsed.

Miguel Indurain, who won the race five consecutive times between 1991 and 1995, at the time an unprecedented sequence, wrote in the Spanish sports daily Marca that Armstrong was still entitled to his seven victories in the race until a universally recognised organisation took them away from him and also described the USADA investigation against him as “strange.”

Armstrong also received words of encouragement from Eddy Merckx, the second man to win the Tour five times after the late jacques Anquetil. Quoted in an AFP report, the Belgian said: "Lance Armstrong is disillusioned and is up against an unjust process.

"At a certain point there's a disenchantment that sets in. Lance is saying to USADA 'do what you want, now I don't care'.

"Lance was always very correct during his career. What more can he do? All the tests he's undertaken, more than 500 since 2000, have come back negative. So, either the tests don't count for anything, or Armstrong is 'legit'.”

Less sympathetic of Armstrong’s plight was the other man to have secured five Tour de France five times, Bernard Hinault, who now works on the race including organising the podium presentations at the end of stages.

“I really couldn’t give a damn," Hinault told the newspaper Ouest-France. "It’s his problem, not mine. This is an issue that should have been sorted out ten or fifteen years ago and it wasn’t.”

Sports stars outside cycling have also been giving their take on the case.

World number 2 tennis player Novak Djokovic, winner of three of the sport’s Grand Slam events, told AFP: “When I heard that story, and many others, I'm disappointed as an athlete, because I know how much it takes to get to where we are and on the top of our own sport, how much sacrifice, commitment, hard work.”

Although tennis is a sport that has consistently been singled out by anti-doping campaigners as having a looser attitude towards testing and enforcement than others such as cycling, the Serb insisted that it was clean.

"In the end we are all seeking to have pure sport. I'm happy that in tennis we do not have that many cases and we are trying to keep that going to keep tradition and to protect the integrity of the sport.

"That's something that sends a strong message about our sport also to young kids because they look up for heroes and they look for role models."

Marathon world record holder Paula Radcliffe was more forthright, tweeting on Friday: “Waking to news on Lance. Sad to see fall of a hero to many but moral of all is keep sport clean #drugcheatsout” and adding: “doping cheats yourself and your competitors but this has cheated millions around the world too.”

Armstrong, like Muhamad Ali or Pele, is a man who transcended his sport to become a truly global personality, and news of the sanctions imposed on him provoked comment beyond the sporting world.

Entrepreneur and Palo Alto Software CEO Sabrina Parsons, blogging for Forbes.com, said that she had been inspired by Armstrong’s story of his comeback from cancer to dominate the Tour de France but his decision not to contest USADA’s charges had made her revise her opinion of him.

“I am so disappointed in Lance,” she wrote. “If he really didn’t dope, it doesn’t matter now. By not clearing his name the cloud above him has gotten so big and so dark that we can’t see that fearless, amazing, relentless, hard-working athlete anymore.

“I was looking forward to giving my eight year old son his book, ‘It’s Not About the Bike’ in the next year or so. I was so excited in sharing this book and giving my son the inspiration to work hard and achieve what you want by working harder than everyone else  - just like Lance did. I remember how inspired I was when I read that book a decade ago.

“But now, I would have to have a discussion with my son about “doping” and drugs, and how Lance is embroiled in this scandal. Sadly, I will find other inspirational stories about athletes to share with my son.

“I will no longer hold Lance Armstrong up as a role model for my kids,” she added.

In what is seen as a show of support for the former cyclist, however, donations to his Lance Armstrong Foundation soared on Friday in the wake of USADA’s announcement, with $78,000 coming into the coffers via online donations, a 25-fold increase on the previous day according to its CEO, Doug Ulman.

Nike, which has sponsored Armstrong personally for a number of years as well as supplying clothing to the teams he rode for as well as those seven Tour de France maillot jaunes he won, has said that he will continue to receive its backing.

"Lance has stated his innocence and has been unwavering on this position,” the sportswear firm said in a statement. “Nike plans to continue to support Lance and the Lance Armstrong Foundation, a foundation that Lance created to serve cancer survivors."

A senior official with France’s national anti-doping agency, l'Agence française de lutte contre le dopage (AFLD), has claimed that Lance Armstrong was regularly warned that he was due to be subject to a doping control.

In an interview with French national newspaper Le Monde, Michel Rieu, scientific advisor to the AFLD, recounted an incident in 2009, as Armstrong prepared to make his Tour de France comeback with Astana, where a random doping control was forestalled by 20 minutes by delaying tactics employed by the rider and his entourage – enough time, he insisted, for a urine sample to be swapped.

He also claimed that the alleged protection afforded to him went beyond the UCI and International Olympic Committee, saying that Nicholas Sarkozy, the former French President who viewed himself as a friend of Armstrong, had pulled strings following a lunch with the former rider at the Elysee Palace in 2009 to ensure the departure from the AFLD of its former chairman, Pierre Bordry.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

39 comments

Avatar
dreamlx10 | 11 years ago
0 likes

the first man to win the Tour five times.

Wrong !

Avatar
hairyairey | 11 years ago
0 likes

I'm quite happy to read scientific papers, my degree is in Mathematics and Computer Science. Can anyone provide a link? What I do know is that drugs take a while to build up in your body and a while to leave, which is why your Doctor will ask you to complete a course of antibiotics.

Unfortunately posters are mixing up two things here. A test for synthetic EPO is not as far as I know testing for the presence of the drug but the effects of it. Therefore you cannot scientifically state that he has tested positive for EPO. False positives and false negatives do occur, ask Diane Modahl. So it's entirely acceptable for Lance to state that he hasn't failed a test. From what I understand they have never had to look at any of Lance's B samples.

Regarding TUEs, you are again assuming that the contents of the cream are properly listed. I recall one athlete failing a test for using the same nasal spray in a different country that had different ingredients. How do you fill in a TUE request in that case? Are we going to have to reach the stage where you have to ask for a TUE for everything that goes into your body? TUEs are usually granted for medicines that are taken on a long term basis, eg salbutamol. If you need the medicine and need to take it for less time than it takes to get a TUE, what can you do?

Also, the USADA has not published it's allegations so how everyone is such an expert on what the case is against Lance amazes me. Reading further into this story it appears some of those might even face criminal charges if it turns out they lied on oath to federal investigators.

I do wonder though whether the assumption that Lance has taken drugs is based on the fact that he is tactless, arrogant and obnoxious?

Avatar
aloxe replied to Shanghaied | 11 years ago
0 likes

Sorry for confusing the two ladies, i've just watched her interview in front of à TV where she was repeating clearly what she heard, she also testified in court in the Sca promotions trial.
May be she was wrong, the doctor didn't remember in fact having heard this.
But the LA fondation made 1,5 million dollar donation to this hospital 2 dans before the hearing.

But Fortunately I remember better the name of Landis, hincapie, Hamilton... May be they are wrong too....

The fact that Heras, Joachim, Landis, Padrnos his team mate were all convince of doping, the fact that during this period all the podium of tour de France including 2nd and third where suspected to dope but the n1 never ??
The fact that after Simeoni testimony against Dr Ferrari, LA called him a liar and sue him for diffamation ( it's true ) litigation been settled by money, like with Lemond and remains confidential.

LA has a big mouth he barks a lot but never goes to court until the end, always he makes a deal before the decision, in a way even in front of Usada he prefers pull out before having to justify himself and discuss the facts, because he sold a story to the american people he fooled the mass with this and people have bought it, they are emotionnally involved but most of it is bull....

Shame for Basson who wanted to stay clean and that he bans from the peloton, Simeoni who report Dr Ferrari as a doping doctor and been harrassed by LA for this, shame for this sport and for LA himself who doesn't know what he really worth as a cyclist, who he really is.
Definitely a man with a will but far from a champion and furthermore a hero

Avatar
Simon_MacMichael replied to dreamlx10 | 11 years ago
0 likes
dreamlx10 wrote:

the first man to win the Tour five times.

Wrong !

Of course. First of the ones who are still alive.

Avatar
Lacticlegs replied to hairyairey | 11 years ago
0 likes

hairyairey...you depress me.

I recall thinking that the end of the Armstrong saga would finally put this all to bed and at last even the most blinkered and partisan fan would finally see what had happened to cycling during the Armstrong era.

I was wrong. The degree of self deception and the willingness to lie to oneself (or be lied to) are as strong as ever.

So I don't know what to say...have you actually followed this story throughout? Is your 'faith' alive in spite of all the overwhelming evidence or did you just not pay proper attention during the last years?

Armstrong has taken the last-gasp and most pathetic route left open to him - rather than try to contest the charges and see his team mates all testify and the entire sordid affair brought into the light, he now says he gives up as it's all too unfair...what an utter coward this man is!! After everything that's transpired, this is how he goes out...guilty as hell and trying to cling on to whatever illusion of credibility is left to him.

And of course the most irritating factor of all - you! People like you who are actually going to buy into this gargantuan bullshit and will parrot this same-style crap: "Lance didn't do it - he never failed a test, just victim of a witch hunt - blah blah"

GROW UP would you please? If you are that eager for fairytales - read the Brothers Grimm.

He DID fail tests - more than once. And even if he hadn't - so what?? There are quite a number of ex-dopers out there who admit to doing it and who never failed a test (our own David Millar among them). The masking systems to cover up doping are as much a part of the process as the dope itself. But hell...why even bother talking about it - clearly nothing will change, the Armstrong fans will join forces with the Flat Earth Society to continue ignoring the obvious, whilst the rest of us will enjoy some genuine cycle racing with realistic mountain ascent times (considerably slower than the Armstrong/Pantani years - but that's just a coincidence right?) and honest-to-goodness bravery, struggle, effort and athleticism...you remember that? Sport!

Avatar
hairyairey | 11 years ago
0 likes

Lacticlegs - the difference with David Millar is that he was caught with the goods necessary for doping and did the honorable thing and owned up. (Incidentally if we had automatic lifetime bans for doping there would have been no point in him doing so).

Lance has always maintained that he hasn't taken performance enhancing drugs other than to save his life. So far I am not convinced that he is lying about this.

I would admit that I even believed that Landis hadn't doped now I see he's admitted it. I once rode with Udo Bolts and I'm even more disappointed to see that he had taken drugs.

I have been following the case very closely. I'm still trying to find a reference that says that synthetic EPO is 100% out of the body a day after taking it. I really do doubt that figure even the food we eat takes about 3.5 days to pass right through. I do accept that it's possible for riders to use EPO to increase their fitness pre-race, but a "micro-dose" makes no sense. It's either a dose that works or doesn't.

If I'm wrong (and I'm prepared to accept that) then doping is far more widespread and hidden than any of us realise. Now hopefully this would lead to more people being caught, because with this amount of denial for this long a lot more people must be involved.

In any event unless there are some amazing drugs out there the performance benefit from performance enhancing drugs is small, but of course enough to mean the difference between victory and defeat. You still have to be an athlete in the first place.

I am hopeful that the truth will come out and I still believe that it will blow over. I am quite prepared to admit I could be wrong, something that those who assume Lance has been taking drugs because they don't like him aren't prepared to admit. (it'll only take one "Lance-hater" to prove me wrong on this).

Avatar
pepita1 replied to hairyairey | 11 years ago
0 likes
hairyairey wrote:

...I think it's indicative of someone who is desperate for approval (which supposedly is a female trait...)

WTF? We ALL (man, woman, child) look for approval, if only to make sure we 'fit in' to the society or group in which we find ourselves!

Avatar
SideBurn | 11 years ago
0 likes

Don't get too excited about cortico-steroids. They sound a bit like anabolic-steroids but in some ways have opposite effects. Knowing what they are used for and what they do I do not know why they are banned. But, apparently, in super excess dose can give you a 'high'. They are widely used and easily obtainable; please do not be tempted, they are 'prescription only' because they not good for you....

Avatar
hairyairey | 11 years ago
0 likes

Pepital - I have Asperger's Syndrome I don't think I've fitted in anywhere. That probably makes the seeking for approval worse in my case. Some days I couldn't care less what people think of me other days I think everyone is out to get me. That's probably due to the Bipolar as well.

Pages

Latest Comments