A law that may have seen thousands of bikes removed unnecessarily from railings in London has been rejected by the House of Lords.
The bill would have allowed council contractors to remove without notice bikes chained to railings even if they weren’t an obstruction or abandoned.
The London Cycling Campaign called the proposals a “lock it and lose it lottery”, arguing that the introduction of the law would have seriously undermined the growth of cycling in the capital.
LCC and cyclists are celebrating victory against legislation that could have seriously undermined the growth of cycling in the capital.
A committee of peers listened to the arguments for and against the legislation, including those from the LCC, and concluded that the relevant clauses should ‘not proceed’.
Speaking for LCC before the committee, the organisation’s counsel Ralph Smyth said: "Because of the lack of clarity as to where you could or could not park your bicycle, this aspect of the bill would have a chilling effect on people’s desire to cycle."
Peers were told powers already exist to remove bicycles that are an obstruction or which are abandoned. The rejected law could have been applied to thousands of bikes that were not attached to bike stands.
LCC’s chief executive Koy Thomson said, “After a long campaign we're delighted that committee members decided to throw out legislation that could have been a serious deterrent to cycling.
“Cycle stands in London are overflowing with bikes, even in the winter. We need more bike stands, not new laws making parking more difficult.”
Many LCC members wrote to the Mayor and to London Assembly representatives last year protesting against the proposed legislation.
The House of Lords committee also rejected legislation that would have allowed councils to set different penalties on different streets for footway cycling.
Peers said there were problems with the traffic environment in London, but that the proposed legislation would not solve them.
One peer suggested that the legislation could have allowed councils to create 16 different penalties. The UK Government, as well as LCC, opposed the proposed legislation.
You can't do around getting rid of grass verges. They provide much needed parking space.
I've found riding primary into upcoming blind bends certainly seems to discourage drivers from overtaking as they would have no choice but to cross...
"Put down your weapon. You have 20 seconds to comply"
Kona makes practical, affordable commuter bikes and goes bust. Colnago makes toys for the affluent and it is booming. Just goes to show that the...
To answer your question, yes you can sometimes feel the difference. Built a set of wheels for a friend and he installed them with new lightweight...
Cycling infrastructure does not force drivers to break the law, drivers are the reason they break the law, no one else.
Ah but taking pictures of things to defy the man (avoid a fine) is righteous. Taking pictures of people to grass on them to the cops (perhaps...
As a woman, this works great for me! My chain broke once, and a kind guy stopped with a chain breaker and sorted it all out for me. We stopped at a...
Same. I also have gone through a bunch of their tyres, and only the extralight disappointed (torn sidewall) but the standards are fantastic....
thanks for the ideas....