Home
Seven-time TDF champ comes second in debut Ironman 70.3 - and then 'snubs' winner, claims NZ press...

Following a weekend in which the sports headlines in Britain have been dominated by the handshake – or rather, the lack thereof – between Liverpool’s Luis Suarez and Manchester United’s Patrice Evra, comes news of another perceived slight involving an athlete apparently refusing to press the flesh. This time, one of the men involved is none other than seven-time Tour de France winner, Lance Armstrong.

As reported on road.cc last week, the Texan has returned to competitive sport, announcing his participation in Ironman events throughout 2012.

The first of those took place in Panama yesterday, when the 40-year-old finished second in the half-distance Ironman 70.3 triathlon, won by New Zealand’s Bevan Docherty, 2004 Olympic triathlon gold medallist.

Afterwards, Docherty reveled that Armstrong had brushed past him at the end of the race, reports the New Zealand Herald, without acknowledging his victory, although he did congratulate him later on, adds the newspaper, which described the initial omission as a ‘snub.’

"I'm not sure what it was all about, I can only assume he was just disappointed to get beaten," Docherty said.

"I did shake his hand a little bit later. He's on a completely different level and planet to us guys [triathletes]," he added.

"It's great to have him in the sport, he certainly adds something. It's an eye opener to see how he gets mobbed and the chaos around him."

Unsurprisingly Armstrong, who competed in triathlon as a teenager before concentrating on road cycling, put in a quicker time than Docherty on the cycling leg of the event.

However, the New Zealander was surprised that his rival, whose 22 Tour de France stage wins include two prologues and four individual time trials, wasn’t more dominant on the bike, although at 90km the distance is well in excess of a typical grand tour time trial stage.

"I thought Lance would absolutely cream us on the bike, but he was probably in a similar position to me where he wasn't too sure how to pace himself," said Docherty. "He certainly looked like he was holding back and that was probably why he ran so well off the bike."

The Kiwi overhauled Armstrong 2.5km from the end of the third and final leg of the event, a 21km run.

"It's great that I could hold one up for the other triathletes and show that it's certainly not a sport that you can just walk into and dominate straight away," he added.

"It's quite an honour to see a seven-time Tour de France winner and someone you admire standing in second place below you on the podium. It's a highlight of my career."

The current controversy over apparent refusal to shake hands isn’t confined to the leading names in sport either. Yesterday, TV cameras caught the Aston Villa mascot blanking his Manchester City counterpart ahead of the teams’ Premier League clash at Villa Park.

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.

21 comments

Avatar
dino [60 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

really? that's it? Oh my! Lance is the Devil! LoL...

 19

Avatar
a_to_the_j [118 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

did this really warrant a major headline / article.
perhaps he was busting for the loo!!!!!!

Avatar
Gkam84 [9086 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Oh no Simon, you may upset some Lance fanboys  4

Avatar
londonplayer [620 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Is this really cycling news? Discuss.

Avatar
gazzaputt [212 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
londonplayer wrote:

Is this really cycling news? Discuss.

No it isn't as we all know triathletes can't ride for toffee  3

Avatar
sneakerfrfeak [98 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

In true tabloid tradition i love the way you have searched the archives for a picture of him with a scowl on his face to fit the story, although, to be fair, you probably didn't have to look too hard.

Avatar
notfastenough [3673 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

But..but..but..it's Lance!

Avatar
Gkam84 [9086 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
londonplayer wrote:

Is this really cycling news? Discuss.

It did involve a "legendary" ex pro cyclist and have 90km of cycling in there, so all in all...................NO not really, but are most of the things broadcast on any number of "news" programs across the TV, printed in mag's and papers and then circulated around the net by media outlets really all news worthy  19

Avatar
mad_scot_rider [581 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
londonplayer wrote:

Is this really cycling news? Discuss.

http://www.velominati.com/the-rules/

Rule #42
// A bike race shall never be preceded with a swim and/or followed by a run.

If it’s preceded with a swim and/or followed by a run, it is not called a bike race, it is called duathlon or a triathlon. Neither of which is a bike race. Also keep in mind that one should only swim in order to prevent drowning, and should only run if being chased. And even then, one should only run fast enough to prevent capture.

Here endeth the lesson

(p.s. for the Lance-fanboys, see Rule #4)

Avatar
londonplayer [620 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

thanks mad scot rider. very amusing!

Avatar
Gkam84 [9086 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Ah but mad scot, the problem arises as "cycling news" on the whole is not just about "a bike race"  3

P.S. I think we may have made Lance fanboys think again before posting  26

Avatar
pwake [374 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

What's a Lance fanboy?

Avatar
Gkam84 [9086 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
pwake wrote:

What's a Lance fanboy?

Someone who loves Lance above all others, believes every word that comes out of his mouth and goes around everywhere proclaiming his god like status and defending him to anyone who might say one word wrong about him

Something like that anyways  4

Avatar
dino [60 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Gkam84,

making us think again before posting? ha... nah, just came home from work.

i'm a LA fan, but he's not my idol! I at least recognize a non-story when i see one... and give LA credit for what he's accomplished. The amount of attention he has brought to American cycling and cancer awareness is irrefutable.

micro-doper, etc... blah blah blah, yeah, got it.  37

glad to learn from a 2K message man... thanks for your insight.

Avatar
mad_scot_rider [581 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
Gkam84 wrote:

Ah but mad scot, the problem arises as "cycling news" on the whole is not just about "a bike race"

Fair point, well made - but to be honest I just saw an opportunity to post something I found wryly amusing  10

Avatar
pwake [374 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Thanks for clarifying that, Gkam.
I was concerned I may be considered a 'fanboy' but as I don't love Lance above all others, I don't believe every word that comes out of his mouth and I don't go around everywhere proclaiming his god like status, then I guess I'm in the clear on that one!
I do, however, believe in the premise of innocent until proven guilty. I do, also, appreciate his indefatigable efforts on behalf of cancer survivors. And I do, also, recognise that anyone who was World Professional RR Champ at 21 is an incredible talent and could possibly have gone on to become one of the sport's greats.

I understand Lance does seem a very polarizing character, but you should appreciate that he has transcended the sport of cycling to the extent that, if he was found to have doped, the vast majority of the American public wouldn't give a shit. The French would probably be happy, but, ultimately, they would still be really pissed at not being able to produce a rider to win their own national tour. People who seem to hate Lance would also be briefly happy, but would then find some other target for their hate/bitterness. Of course, if he was British there would be no doubt about his career?
I write this as a Brit who lives in Texas, so I may have a slightly different perspective, but, really, it's time to move on...

Avatar
Karbon Kev [688 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

thats just sour grapes cos he didn't win - idiot

Avatar
jazzdude [71 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

How DARE he not shake hands the moment there happens to be a reporter present? Who does he think he is, someone who's just completed a thoroughly exhausting race or something?

Avatar
Gkam84 [9086 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Wow pwake, do not take my comments as me being a Lance hater, i actually posted this in the forum before the news item was put up

http://road.cc/content/forum/52549-armstrong-ironman-comback

The only reason i put up what my views of a fanboy were was because someone asked what it meant

I in no way dislike Lance, just think there are a few dodgy things in his past, just like everyone else has, he's just not as squeaky clean as some people make out.

BUT, i have alot of respect for him outside of cycling for what he has done with his charity and his efforts to raise money to fight cancer.

Avatar
Timbo13 [264 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
Gkam84 wrote:

BUT, i have alot of respect for him outside of cycling for what he has done with his charity and his efforts to raise money to fight cancer.

I've understood there's a pretty big question mark as to how much of that charity money goes to the actual fight against cancer, mind

http://fraudbytes.blogspot.com/2012/01/lance-armstrong-investigation.html

Avatar
pwake [374 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Agreed, Gkam.
I don't really understand the need for any public figure to be squeaky clean. I'm sure Lance has some dodgy things in his past, as any person would.
Not sure of the size of that question mark Timbo. Article just seems to say that no Livestrong funds go to cancer research, but used for awareness and mentoring etc. Makes sense when there are other massive charities that concentrate solely on research. Why duplicate the effort?