DfT publishes final assessment of Cycling City and Towns initiative - in 17 separate reports
Reports put online by government with little fanfare or fuss - and it's left to the reader to draw national picture...

In an unannounced move, the Department for Transport (DfT) has published on its website, quite without fanfare, 17 separate End of Programme reports provided to it by the 18 local authorities involved in the now-defunct Cycling City and Towns programme.

Published on the DfT website without an accompanying press release nor any other announcement we are aware of, there’s no attempt to portray the national picture or draw broader lessons from the initiative – emblematic, perhaps, of the fragmented and decentralised approach adopted in this area and others by the Coalition Government. If Cycling England were still around, one imagines the presentation would have been rather different and more cohesive.

Publication of the End of Programme reports, the eventual provision of which to the DfT would presumably have been a requirement of securing funding in the first place, comes a little more than a year after an interim report on the evaluation of the programme was published; however, there’s no news of when the final report might be made available.

Although it was published in January 2011, that interim report compiled by a consortium led by AECOM in partnership with the University of the West of England and the Tavistock Institute remains the most up-to-date assessment of the impact of the programme as a whole.

The Cycling City and Towns initiative sprang out of the Six Cycling Demonstration Towns which began receiving funding in 2005.

Between 2008 and 2011, a total of £140 million was spent by the DfT, Department of Health and Cycling England on promoting cycling, with £50 million going to the Cycling City and Towns programme, which also benefited from match funding from local authorities.

Despite the efforts of campaigners to save it, Cycling England – and with it, the Cycling City and Towns initiative – was one of the victims of the Coalition Government’s ‘Bonfire of the Quangos’ in 2010.

The End of Programme reports for each of the local authorities included in the Cycling City and Towns programme (listed below) can be downloaded from the DfT website.

Greater Bristol
Lancaster and Morecambe
Stoke on Trent

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.


robbieC [60 posts] 3 years ago

Its a shame though that the new approach at the DfT is to run trials without determining the success criteria by which they are judged. I guess some would call this 'big society' - here's the evidence, yep we spent your money, nope we don't know or care if it worked. Bigger fish to fry - cars.

Municipal Waste [237 posts] 3 years ago

Why shouldn't they spend our money on cars Robbie? They're quite popular in fairness.

Jimih73 [30 posts] 3 years ago

What happened to Brighton's report?  7

Viro Indovina [81 posts] 3 years ago

Just found out from a Brighton and Hove City Councillor that council members are working on finishing the report. They have informed (and apologized to) DfT and hope to get it to them in a fortnight at the latest.