CAS bans Jan Ullrich for 2 years, strips him of results obtained since 1 May 2005

German's links to Operacion Puerto see him lose 2005 TDF podium place, 2006 Tour de Suisse overall and Giro stage

by Simon_MacMichael   February 9, 2012  

Jan Ullrich riding for T-Mobile (picture credit Heidas:Wikimedia Commons).jpg

Just three days after Alberto Contador was stripped of the 2010 Tour de France title by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the same body has banned 1997 winner Jan Ullrich for a period of two years, the suspension backdated to 22 August 2011. Ullrich retired in February 2007, but the announcement is likely to result in more unwelcome headlines for cycling. The 38-year-old has also been stripped of results from 1 May 2005 onwards, including his third place behind Lance Armstrong in that year’s Tour de France.

That means a podium place will go to former Illes Balears-Caisse d'Epargne rider Francisco Mancebo, who had finished fourth in that race, while Ullrich also loses his overall victory in the 2006 Tour de Suisse, where the runner up was the now retired former Saunier Duval rider, Koldo Gil. The German also loses his final Grand Tour stage win, an individual time trial in the 2006 Giro d’Italia.

In November last year, CAS had said it lacked jurisdiction to rule on a lifetime ban sought by Swiss Anti-Doping against Ullrich, who had raced under a Swiss licence while a resident of the country.

Today’s decision relates to a separate action brought by world cycling’s governing body, the UCI after the Disciplinary Chamber of Swiss Olympic ruled in 2009 that it did not have the necessary jurisdiction to sanction Ullrich with regard to his involvement in the blood doping ring broken up by the Operacion Puerto in Spain in 2006.

Ullrich, the first German to win the Tour de France, who also finished second to Marco Pantani in 1998 and again to Lance Armstrong for three years in a row from 2000, was barred by organsisers ASO from taking part in that year’s Tour and sacked by his T-Mobile team the following month.

In a statement published today, the CAS said that the evidence showed that Ullrich had visited Dr Eufemiano Fuentes, who himself is due to stand trial in Spain in connection with Operacion Puerto “on multiple occasions,” that he had paid him €80,000 and that his DNA profile was a match for blood contained in bags seized by the Spanish authorities. As a result, it concluded that he had "engaged at least in blood doping in contravention of Article 15.2 of the UCI Anti-doping rules."

The UCI had argued for a lifetime ban, claiming that Ullrich’s links to Puerto constituted a second offence – in 2002, he had received a six month ban after testing positive for amphetamines. The CAS rejected that argument however, since a subsequent change in rules means that the substance in question only constitutes an anti-doping offence if found in a sample taken in an in-competition test, which wasn't the situation in Ullrich's case.

The UCI had also sought to have all of Ullrich’s results annulled from 29 May 2002, but the CAS instead fixed the date as running from 1 May 2005, “as it is established that Jan Ullrich was fully engaged with Dr Fuentes's doping program at least from that date.”

The CAS statement added that “The Panel also expressed its surprise that Ullrich did not question the veracity of the evidence or any other substantive aspect of this case, limiting his defence to procedural issues.”

The full award can be found here.

 

7 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Way to try and cover up talking about Alberto and at the same time, drag the image of cycling down further

Gkam84's picture

posted by Gkam84 [9040 posts]
9th February 2012 - 12:10

1 Like

Francisco Mancebo (who moves into third place for the 2005 tour) is also linked to Puerto!

two wheels good; four wheels bad

posted by cat1commuter [1380 posts]
9th February 2012 - 12:15

0 Likes

cat1commuter wrote:
Francisco Mancebo (who moves into third place for the 2005 tour) is also linked to Puerto!

Good point, but he's Spanish. Move along, nothing to see here... Wink

Simon_MacMichael's picture

posted by Simon_MacMichael [8513 posts]
9th February 2012 - 12:52

0 Likes

Monumental waste of time and money!
Can't we just sweep that era under the carpet and let sleeping dogs lie.
Oh, sorry, of course the Lance Armstrong witch hunt is still ongoing.

posted by Glossies [29 posts]
9th February 2012 - 13:36

1 Like

Can't we just sweep that era under the carpet
What do think this is? Football. Cool

posted by GrahamH [19 posts]
9th February 2012 - 15:20

0 Likes

When do the investigations into Anquetil et al begin?

posted by Chrisc [144 posts]
10th February 2012 - 11:44

0 Likes

In any case of doping being proven, the top riders must have benefited through sponsorship & salary.
Do they then have to pay back a portion of what they made?
The riders who have therefore stepped up a place must have lost out on wages etc. Are they liable then to sue the stripped riders?

I'm always in two minds
Then I go and pick the wrong one Sad

posted by fluffchucker [284 posts]
10th February 2012 - 22:56

1 Like