Home
Press release confirms federal investigation at an end, but anti-doping body to press on

Federal prosecutors in the United States investigating allegations of doping centred around Lance Armstrong and his former US Postal Service team have closed the case with no charges being brought against the seven-time Tour de France champion. However, the US Anti-Doping Agency has said that it will continue with its own enquiry into doping within professional cycling in the country.

A report in the Washington Post cited a press release from the office of United States Attorney André Birotte Jr. that confirmed that his staff “is closing an investigation into allegations of federal criminal conduct by members and associates of a professional bicycle racing team owned in part by Lance Armstrong.”

No reason was disclosed for the decision to close the case, but referring to why it had decided to formally anounce that the investigation had been closed, the statement continued:

“The United States Attorney determined that a public announcement concerning the closing of the investigation was warranted by numerous reports about the investigation in media outlets around the world.

“Mr. Birotte commended the joint investigative efforts of his prosecutors and special agents with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Postal Service - Office of the Inspector General.”

However, in a statement issued in reaction to the news, USADA Chief Executive Travis Tygart emphasised that his organisation's own enquiry would continue.

“Unlike the U.S. Attorney, USADA’s job is to protect clean sport rather than enforce specific criminal laws," he said. "Our investigation into doping in the sport of cycling is continuing and we look forward to obtaining the information developed during the federal investigation.

In response to the anoucement that the Federal investigation was over, "This is great news," said Armstrong's spokesman, Mark Fabiani.

"Lance is pleased that the United States Attorney made the right decision, and he is more determined than ever to devote his time and energy to Livestrong and to the causes that have defined his career."

Armstrong had hit the headlines earlier in the day when it was revealed that his LiveStrong charity was donating $100,000 to Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc for cancer screening after a controversial decision by another charity, Susan G Komen for the Cure, to end its previous funding.

The latter organisation has since reversed its decision to end funding as a result of the outcry, reports Business Week.

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.

31 comments

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove [139 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

 13 OMG! He was naturally gifted after all?!  44

Avatar
Rob Simmonds [251 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

I presume the Feds couldn't get enough to make charges stick. Doesn't change my opinion of the man.

Avatar
Rob Simmonds [251 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

The Clinic might actually explode....

Avatar
matt merritt [1 post] 4 years ago
0 likes

rob simmons your a massive Dick.

Avatar
nick_rearden [436 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
matt merritt wrote:

rob simmons your a massive Dick.

You're new here aren't you, Matt?

Avatar
londonplayer [620 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

I agree with the decision not to place criminal charges against Lance. The criminal law should not get involved in sport, especially over an issue such as this.

Avatar
sneakerfrfeak [103 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

A bit strange that no reason was given.

Avatar
andyp [1473 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

'I agree with the decision not to place criminal charges against Lance. The criminal law should not get involved in sport, especially over an issue such as this.'

The doping per se...agreed. The vast amounts of money made on the back of fraud and deception*...surely that's a case for criminal charges?

*allegedly, and that.

Avatar
Stumps [3414 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

There is no smoke without fire in my opinion. Perhaps the US didn't want one of it's most famous sportsmen turned into a joke  39

Personally i dont think he was clean but he did have one hell of a lot of natural talent which, if he did take anything, is a shame.

Avatar
Rob Simmonds [251 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:

There is no smoke without fire in my opinion. Perhaps the US didn't want one of it's most famous sportsmen turned into a joke  39

I don't think that's how the Feds roll - they're about law enforcement, not PR. After all, Novitsky was the chap who nailed the Balco lab cheats and they were as big as Lance.

USADA are still on the case and their remit is strictly anti-doping, not law enforcement.

Avatar
italiafirenze [70 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

It seems accepted that he is guilty of something, despite there being no evidence to prove such guilt. Until I see inscrutable evidence to the contrary I'd like to believe he, and all others faced with accusations, is innocent.

Unfortunately there only has to be the whiff of a rumour of something suspicious and lots of cycling fans will write you off as being a doper forever more. I don't see Mercx, Hinault and Anquetil faced with the kind of vitriol that is reserved for Armstrong and Contador.

It can never be proved that either didn't dope, because you can never prove a negative. So we must presume that they are innocent, lest we live in a society where the Sun newspaper and internet forums are judge and jury.

Avatar
Rob Simmonds [251 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
italiafirenze wrote:

It seems accepted that he is guilty of something, despite there being no evidence to prove such guilt. Until I see inscrutable evidence to the contrary I'd like to believe he, and all others faced with accusations, is innocent.

Hmmm, the failed test in 99, EPO in the re-tests from 99, the confessions and accusations from key members of his team, anecdotal evidence from ex-employees, his hostility to anyone speaking up against doping, the failed tests by so many of his ex-teammates after they left the USP mothership, the dodgy 'donation' to the UCI, every single one of his rivals being busted for doping. Etc...

You're right, it seems very unreasonable to think that he did anything wrong.

Avatar
Aapje [242 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
italiafirenze wrote:

I don't see Merckx, Hinault and Anquetil faced with the kind of vitriol that is reserved for Armstrong and Contador.

There are reasons for that:
- Doping at that time made much less of a difference. Only in the EPO-era could mediocre riders suddenly beat natural champions. So EPO-era dopers commit a worse offense.
- Doping was accepted at that time. We (partially) judge cyclists with the morals from the era they rode in.
- Armstrong is a huge dick.

Finally, presumed innocent is a concept from the courts, which has got nothing to do with the opinions of random people. 'We' can freely make up our own mind and judge for ourselves. 'Presumed innocent' only comes into play when we want the government to punish someone.

Avatar
Michael5 [121 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
Aapje wrote:

- Armstrong is a huge dick.

You're new here, aren't you Aapej?

Avatar
veseunr [258 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Aapje .... "huge dick"??

If only there were more "huge dicks" in the world donating millions of dollars to cancer charities, we might be a better world.

Although, as a cancer patient myself, I might just have a different perspective to you?

I'm new here!

Avatar
Aapje [242 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
veseunr wrote:

Aapje .... "huge dick"??

Yes, as been proven time and again by how he behaved on and off the bike. I'm not the only one who feels this way:

http://www.billgifford.com/2009/07/yes-i-called-lance-armstrong-jerk.html

Quote:

If only there were more "huge dicks" in the world donating millions of dollars to cancer charities, we might be a better world.

Are you talking about Livestrong? If so, I hope you realize that the money is donated by others, not by Lance personally. I have no idea if he personally donated anything and I don't think you do either.

Quote:

Although, as a cancer patient myself, I might just have a different perspective to you?

Cancer is one of the most common diseases and pretty much anyone has lost relatives to it. So claiming moral high ground because you are a cancer patient is rather silly.

Livestrong is a cancer 'awareness' charity, which means that almost no money from the charity goes to actually fighting the disease. Just like a lot of the breast cancer charity racket, it does very little to actually fighting cancer, but is mostly succesful in making people feel good about themselves. It's also good at drawing money away from actual research, doing more harm than good IMO.

Lance was really smart to start up this charity, because it's great PR for him, despite not costing him much (donations are by others and those also pay for running the charity, so it only costs him a bit of his time). A while back, he started a for profit company: Livestrong.com, not to be confused with the non-profit: Livestrong.org. So now he can actually make money off people who think they are dealing with the charity. Great business model.

But hey, he is associated with a cancer charity, so he MUST be a good guy, right? That is how PR works and how you were duped.

Avatar
Stumps [3414 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Aapje - you seem to contradict yourself by saying

"Are you talking about Livestrong? If so, I hope you realize that the money is donated by others, not by Lance personally. I have no idea if he personally donated anything and I don't think you do either"

So if you dont know if he does or does not donate to charity how do you know that all the money donated by livestrong is from others  7 .

Basically you seem to have a huge chip in relation to Armstrong and no matter what he does or doesn't do it's wrong, thats your opinion which you are entitled to.

However I think you are bang out of order making comments about Veseunr, its not what the forum is about and not needed or wanted.  14

Avatar
veseunr [258 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Water of a duck's...

I was just saying maybe I have a different perspective. If you want to assume the moral low-ground .... well...you have!

Avatar
veseunr [258 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Thanks for support Stumps

Avatar
WolfieSmith [1327 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Obviously new! It's 'you're' not 'your' and I'm not sure 'Dick' needs a capital unless Rob is actually Richard?  3

That said, swearing has no place on this site. Youtube's the place for name calling.  4

Avatar
Aapje [242 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

My point is that it's not a personal charity fund like the Gates Foundation where all the money comes from 1 person. Lance Armstrong is not handing out 25 mln $ of his own money to other people every year. Someone else runs the charity and does that with other people's money. So the statement that Lance is 'donating millions of dollars to cancer charities' is simply not supported by facts. Perhaps he is, but until there is proof, it's just speculation and not an fact that one can use to argue that Lance is a good guy.

As for me having a beef with Armstrong, I have formed an opinion based on many years of following cycling. I believe that he was a driving force behind the continued use of doping in the peleton, even as the public opinion was changing and some people were making an honest effort to clean it up. I do feel strongly about that.

stumps wrote:

However I think you are bang out of order making comments about Veseunr, its not what the forum is about and not needed or wanted.

I saw it as him claiming the moral high ground for a silly reason, but in hindsight, I might have read the worst in the comment. For that, I apologize, although I don't think my comments were particularly mean towards him. Ultimately we all dislike cancer, so we can all agree that working to fight cancer is a moral thing to do.

However, I think we should be aware that not all charity work is actually effective and some people abuse charity for selfish reasons.

Avatar
Stumps [3414 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Ok mate apology accepted.

I think you will find that there are lots of things in life that are not effective - a bit like this current Govt  24

Avatar
The _Kaner [935 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

rob simmons your a massive Dick.

m.merritt

Took all this time to sign up to leave a first comment like that (bad spelling aside- and couldn't even get Rob's surname correct)...way to go....it's a forum about cycling/bikes....time for kiddywinkles to go to bed methinks....

Avatar
dino [60 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

Whether the allegations are true or false, LA has done a tremendous amount of work for US Cycling and Cancer Awareness. I don't think it is a stretch that most cyclist in the US at least respect Lance for all that he has done.
At the end of the day, the negativity gets old... cycling is on the right path with testing (i hardly think anyone reading these comments has 'all' of the answers) and let's promote all of the young riders in the ranks and great looking bikes that roll out every new year!
That DeRosa Protos is dead sexy!

Avatar
bauchlebastart [102 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

In his first book - It's Not About the Bike, the poor guy thought he was dying and I couldn't muster much sympathy for him. His objectionable personality tarnished the whole book....imo

On the doping side........he was (and still is) a great bike rider. But I can't believe he dominated the 'EPO years' riding clean,

Avatar
russyparkin [570 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

woah this post has gone a bit 'bike radar' everyone chill out, its the weekend and it isnt snowing so lets all calm down and not call each other or sportsmen we have never met dicks.

Avatar
Stumps [3414 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
russyparkin wrote:

woah this post has gone a bit 'bike radar' everyone chill out, its the weekend and it isnt snowing so lets all calm down and not call each other or sportsmen we have never met dicks.

Looking out my window and the snow is belting down, no ride for me tomorrow.  20

Avatar
russyparkin [570 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes

ah bad luck! devons the place to be, if theres a catastrophic world wide ice age, it would merely rain in plymouth

Avatar
mad_scot_rider [581 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
russyparkin wrote:

ah bad luck! devons the place to be, if theres a catastrophic world wide ice age, it would merely rain in plymouth

Possibly - but oh, HOW hard it would rain!

Avatar
bashthebox [752 posts] 4 years ago
0 likes
bauchlebastart wrote:

On the doping side........he was (and still is) a great bike rider. But I can't believe he dominated the 'EPO years' riding clean,

This.

Simple fact is that for decades the dominant forces in cycling partook in some sort of artificial and illegal enhancement - be it EPO, amphetamines, or whatever. Lance isn't the only great to be tarnished... check out this list, it's insane.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doping_cases_in_cycling

Thing is, there will have been a lot of riders who didn't want to cheat, who could never have the chance to compete fairly against those that did.

A level playing field (or as much as is possible) is needed for us to enjoy sport properly. Its why things like F1 are so boring, or rich foreign owners buying footy clubs ruin the game.

Pages