The AA are taking to the streets of London today and handing out free helmets and hi-viz vests to cyclists, a move which has raised the ire of the cycling community and led to the CTC to hand out copies of the Highway Code at the same spot. Whilst current AA prsident Edmund King is a keen cyclist and the AA is guardedly pro-cycling as a rule, many cyclists have questioned why a motoring organisation feels the need to place the responsibility on cyclists to protect themselves: especially when helmets aren't designed to protect against collisions with cars.
The AA have 5,000 Raleigh Missile helmets, RRP £27.99, to give away. They're fairly standard fare, with the addition of an integrated LED in the rear adjustment dial. King himself will be in attendance to help with the distibution, which is taking place today at Waterloo Place, London SW1Y 4BN this morning and the west side of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3NA from 1pm. Other locations may also be used, you can follow Edmund King on twitter for updates.
According to a recent poll commissioned by the AA, 97% of their members believe that cyclists should wear helmets, although only 18% of those members actually cycle themselves. The helmet giveaway is aimed primarily at the users of Boris Bikes, although any cyclist can claim one. “We welcome the increase in cycling brought about by the cycle hire scheme but we want to ensure that more cyclists don’t lead to more casualties. The use of cycle helmets and vests by all cyclists could significantly reduce the number and severity of injuries that occur each year", said King.
What he didn't say, which has angered many cycling advocates, is that the burden of responsibility lies not just with cyclists. Indeed the accident statistics show that cyclists are not to blame for the vast majority of collisions, with the police attributing blame to the driver in up to three quarters of collisions between a bicycle and other vehicle in accidents involving adult bike riders.
Mikael Colville-Andersen of Copenhagenize.com is quoted on Bikehub as saying, “While it’s great that the AA president is also a cyclist, this is merely another case of placing the responsibility on the vulnerable traffic users instead of tackling the rampant bull in our society – the automobile. It also sends dangerous signals that bicycle helmets are effective in collisions with cars, which they’re not. They’re not even designed for that kind of impact. "
The AA's stance has particularly angered the CTC, which will also be at the handout spots distributing copies of the Highway Code to motorists to balance what it describes as a "disturbingly one sided" safety campaign. The CTC issued a press release last night which stated, "any organisation that focuses exclusively on vulnerable road users in this way, even for publicity purposes, risks misrepresenting the sources of road danger. CTC believes that far bigger road safety gains can be made by tackling instances of bad driving".
There was much to-ing and fro-ing on twitter last night but King was bullish, although to his detriment he did rely on likening helmets to much more proven safety devices ("I have a helmet, I have an air bag but it doesnt mean I think everyone wants to crash into me") and anecdotes ("Gaby Roslin says helmet saved her partner David's life. James Cracknell agrees") rather than explaining how the helmets were going to make a meaningful impact on cyclist safety in London, where the majority of cycling deaths are down to collisions with heavy goods vehicles.
Still, if you want a free helmet or a hi-viz vest, or both, today's your day. Assuming you're in London. The AA have said they'll be repeating the giveaway in other UK cities later in the year.
Add new comment
41 comments
if only the CTC would hand out explosive steering wheels
Sorry mate your paranoid The article plainly highlighted what mainly London cyclists faced! And there was no mention of helmets or hi-viz at all. The Independent needs to be applauded in highlighting these issues! The Daily Hate though would have probably financed this exercise
On another note, with regard to 'contributary negligence' the next thing the insurance companies will do is question the fitting and integrity of said helmet! I have been cycling for nearly 40 years and have probably lost more skin than brain cells due to coming off my bike
I wear a lid as it is handy to stuff lights, mits etc into!
All the AA has done is give the image that cycling is not safe! As a motoring organisation they should put their resourses into educating their members about 'cycle awareness'
The AA should send free helmets to all their members and asked then to wear them while driving.
They'd save a lot more lives that way.
I really don't understand all this sniping and hysteria going on at the moment, cyclists v drivers, them v us, why??
The AA's promotion in my opinion is good, it shows that the AA as an organisation is thinking about cyclists. I feel that the free hi viz kit which is given out by cycling organisations tends to antagonise drivers by writing things like 'The zero emission option' on the back, or some other stupid and inconsequential clap trap. I would generally say that most cyclists are drivers too and I am sure there are many situations, of which I have experienced some, where the actions of a cyclist has angered you and put themselves in danger. We all need to work together and I am getting fed up of all the nastiness from both sides. There will always be bad drivers and bad cyclists, accept it.
The CTC has a lot of explaining to do as in recent years they have taken a very militant attitude towards drivers particularly locally, to such an extent that I am tempted to cancel my membership. The AA's activity, although obviously a publicity stunt, is not a bad thing just should have been organised differently perhaps.
Is this a true fact or an internet fact?
If this had been emailed to me before 1745 I might have been able to get one!!! Not very helpful!!
@ Russcutts: Well said mate!! I don't actually drive yet, but I get really pee'd off about moronic cyclists giving the rest of us a bad name too, especially when they think that red lights don't apply to them!!
If the AA were handing out free aero helmets I would go along to claim mine. Look's like I'm just going to have to buy one then.....
Good on the AA... we need more people like this..
True fact. Don't know how good your French is but.... http://www2.securiteroutiere.gouv.fr/vos-infos/presse/communiques/3-2008... gives you the low down...
"The use of cycle helmets and vests by all cyclists could significantly reduce the number and severity of injuries....". UTTER NONSENSE!
Please Mr King explain how the wearing of PPE can possibly reduce the number of accidents? Yes it might reduce the severity of a particular accident when it happens but passive bits of plastic cannot prevent an accident. Accidents are down to people.
Pages