UCI threatens to sue Floyd Landis over cover-up allegations

Lawyers instructed as a result of American's interview on German TV last November

by Simon_MacMichael   February 16, 2011  

Floyd Landis (© Photosport International)

In a week dominated by news that Alberto Contador has been cleared of doping charges, it has emerged that the UCI, together with past president Hein Verbruggen and current incumbent Pat McQuaid, plans to sue Floyd Landis, still the only man to have been stripped of the Tour de France title for doping.

A letter from Rolf Ditesheim of Reymond & Associés, dated 7 February 2010 obtained by NY Velocity and reproduced on its website tells the cyclist:

“I inform you that I have been appointed by the International Cycling Union (UCI), as well as by its current and former leaders, including Mr Pat McQuaid and Mr Hein Verbruggen, after statements you made about them that are detrimental to their honour, in particular during an interview broadcast on the 28th November 2010 by the German television channel ARD and picked up by various media.

“For the record, you basically indicate that the UCI and its current and former leaders may protect certain cyclists suspected of doping and not others, may falsify results and create stars, and that they may be corrupt. These accusations, which are as serious as they are false, are unacceptable.

“My principals have instructed me to use all legal processes necessary to defend their honour. The first measure to be undertaken is the opening of legal action of Switzerland.

“Before the opening of proceedings, my principals wish to give you the opportunity to retract your allegations. If you are interested by this proposition, I would ask you to inform me within 15 days. This time limit cannot be extended.”

Landis admitted to his own drug-taking in May last year and at the same time claimed that Lance Armstrong and other members of the former US Postal Service team had been involved in organised doping, with those allegations now at the centre of an investigation by special agent Jeff Novtzky of the Food & Drug Administration.

The former cyclist, who had reiterated those allegations in the interview with ARD, and accused the UCI of instigating a cover-up to protect Armstrong, wasted no time in responding to the law firm.

Landis yesterday copied the website Cycling News in on an email in which he asked Ditesheim “to please try and reconcile” an article that had appeared on Cycling News last Friday headed ‘Carpani says UCI pleased with Spanish Federation’s handling of Contador case’ “with your threat of litigation in light of todays [sic] exoneration of Aberto Contador.”

Presumably, the inference drawn by Landis is that Contador has benefited from preferential treatment, although were the UCI not to appeal his case to the Court of Arbitration for sport, that would perhaps be even more surprising than the Spanish national federation’s decision to exonerate the cyclist in the first place following his positive test for clenbuterol in last year’s Tour de France.
 

3 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Honestly. If I were someone considering taking up cycling for the first time, what with the UCI / Landis / Contador / Armstrong at one end of the scale, and Carlton Reid / Jim Davis at the other, I'd be thinking of going off and finding an altogether more wholesome and friendly sport and pastime to get involved in! At Wits End

simonmb's picture

posted by simonmb [360 posts]
16th February 2011 - 8:26

like this
Like (3)

Very true - but to be honest I don't think Landis cares any more how he damages the sport.

He's turned into a petulant child, lashing out in all directions and not caring about the results.

The best outcome for the sport IMHO is for the Contador case to be appealled and his penalty re-instated according to the letter of the rules - and (as unlikely as it might seem) for Armstrong to come through the current investigation totally vindicated.

Hey - I can live in hope.

posted by mad_scot_rider [535 posts]
16th February 2011 - 10:16

like this
Like (2)

simonmb wrote:
Honestly. If I were someone considering taking up cycling for the first time, what with the UCI / Landis / Contador / Armstrong at one end of the scale, and Carlton Reid / Jim Davis at the other, I'd be thinking of going off and finding an altogether more wholesome and friendly sport and pastime to get involved in! At Wits End

I don't think the pro scene really alters newcomers perspective of the sport. I know I didn't get into cycling because I thought I would turn pro, and so wasn't worried about everyone at the top being tainted by doping. I got into cycling because I loved the sport, and I wanted to meet more people with the same love for it. You don't see people not playing football, even though a large number of high-profile professional footballers have had an affair, or beat some one up do you?

I am not saying that it doesn't effect the general public's view of the sport, as people I have spoke to before have asked my opinion on the doping allegations. But for anyone seriously thinking of taking up the sport, I don't think it matters. At amateur level I can't think of a much more friendly and inviting sport.

Avonlea-Treasure Race Team
http://www.altrt.com
twitter:@davidcwhitfield

roadracedave's picture

posted by roadracedave [75 posts]
16th February 2011 - 13:41

like this
Like (3)