Updated: West Country faces complete fixed speed camera switch off

News accompanies job losses at local Safety Camera Partnership

by Simon_MacMichael   February 7, 2011  

Speed Camera © Simon MacMichael.jpg

The Safecam Partnership which manages the speed camera network across the Avon & Somerset police area has announced that the fixed camera network in Somerset and North Somerset council areas will be switched of following a reduction in government funding. As well as the camera switch off the local Safety Camera Partnership’s management team is to be axed, with Avon & Somerset Police assuming responsibility for managing mobile speed cameras.

Laurie Lewis, chair of the partnership, told the BBC that the police would continue to use mobile units in certain places, following news that three management positions were to be scrapped in Taunton and that an office in Bristol that processes fines would have jobs there cut from 44 to 30 as a result of a report carried out by the consultancy firm, Deloitte.

"If it's a smaller operation it would be naive to suggest that people are all going to keep their jobs," Mr Lewis told BBC News. "In Avon and Somerset we're looking at a reduction in numbers and how, where possible, we can redeploy staff."

Mr Lewis added: "In relation to Somerset, they've already made the decision to withdraw from fixed cameras. In terms of the West of England [formerly the county of Avon], they have yet to formally make up their minds which way they want to go."

A recent Which? survey reported here on road.cc found that less than half of the 3,000 speed cameras in England & Wales are actually being used, although Avon & Somerset had one of the highest utilisation rates at 94%.

The BBC says that while cameras in Somerset cost £60,000 annually to operate, many need to be upgraded, which would cost £405,000, and Mr Lewis maintained that using mobile cameras would be "more intelligent".

A Somerset County Council spokesman told the BBC that efforts undertaken alongside the Safety Camera Partnership to devise a new funding model that would have allowed the speed cameras to remain on.

"Avon and Somerset Police withdrew from this option and instead asked the council to take on responsibility for maintenance of the fixed cameras which we declined due to the future cost implications," he commented.

"We are deeply disappointed at the police decision. It remains our view that a self-funding operation is a workable alternative to switching off fixed cameras," he added.

The Safecam Partnership comprises two road safety partnerships: The West of England Road Safety Partnership covers the council areas of Bristol, Bath & North East Somerset and North Somerset and South Gloucestershire, while the Somerset Road Safety Partnership covers the Somerset County Council area.

At present Somerset and North Somerset have cut their funding for speed cameras while South Gloucestershire has indicated that it is likely to cut its funding too. Bristol and Bath & North East Somerset have as yet made no indication about their intentions regarding speed camera funding - although a report on last night's regional BBC News programme, Points West inferred after talking to the councils that if the rest of the members of the partnership were no longer funding fixed speed cameras it was unlikely that the remaining to authorities would either. 

News of the loss of the Somerset's fixed speed cameras has been greeted with dismay by many residents of the county with one woman, Pat Ireland, setting up a charity to help pay for the upkeep of the speed camera in the village of Rooksbridge where she lives. Mrs Ireland's husband Gordon was killed by a speeding motorist on the A38 in January 2008.

Should the speed cameras in Oxfordshire remain switched off there is a very real possibility that there will be no fixed speed cameras heading west between Berkshire and Devon and the Devon & Cornwall Speed Camera Partnership is also having its funding cut while a recent survey of speed cameras by Which? found that only 12 per cent of speed cameras in the Thames Valley area actually worked. Which would mean that speeding drivers would have little fear of encountering a speed camera anywhere west of London.

7 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Avon & Somerset isn't a local authority. It's a police force whose area covers five local authorities: Somerset, North Somerset, BANES, Bristol and South Gloucestershire. It sounds like the police and Somerset have cut and the other four haven't said.

posted by a.jumper [833 posts]
7th February 2011 - 15:32

1 Like

Yes, good point. As it stands the only two that haven't said are Bristol & BANES

Tony Farrelly's picture

posted by Tony Farrelly [4201 posts]
7th February 2011 - 17:23


Since some drivers can't help but speed, this is a odd decision.

posted by northstar [1113 posts]
7th February 2011 - 18:47

1 Like

Someone please help me out...how is it that fixed (or mobile) speed cameras are a cost rather than a revenue generator for local councils?

Why not simply adjust the fines appropriately so that they are self funding.

posted by lokikontroll [51 posts]
7th February 2011 - 20:42


Why not simply adjust the fines appropriately so that they are self funding.

You wouldn't be suggesting that the poor oppressed driver might have to pay even higher fees, that their god given rights might be impinged by some lefty, tree-hugger... What is the world coming to, the Daily mail is right it is all Brussels fault.

mrmo's picture

posted by mrmo [1889 posts]
7th February 2011 - 23:28


They're not a revenue generator because councils are not allowed to keep the fines – they have to go back to the Exchequer whereas councils, or speed camera partnerships do have to pay for their maintenance - so they got all of the cost but none of the benefit.

However, the road safety partnerships can keep the fees generated by speed awareness courses and the like which is why some are looking at using speed cameras to catch people, but except in the most serious cases sending them on courses rather than hitting them with fines. That way the cameras could be continued to be funded. That was something suggested I think by ACPO but some police forces don't seem to want to go down that route and are simply baiing out altogether leaving the councils to either stump up for the gap in funding or shut down the cameras.

The really obvious solution would be for the government simply to allow the partnerships or the councils to keep the fines raised but to force them to spend all of the money on road safety initiatives. Obviously though that's too simple a solution for a politician to grasp.

Tony Farrelly's picture

posted by Tony Farrelly [4201 posts]
7th February 2011 - 23:53


There's going to be a lot more of this - as Tony mentions above, police forces have different views on how they want to deal with the issue and it's consistently at odds with local authorities. I was speaking to a road safety officer at a west midlands authority just the other day and again it was the police who were unwilling to budge when it came to agreeing alternative funding mechanisms (i.e. course fees).

G-bitch's picture

posted by G-bitch [320 posts]
8th February 2011 - 12:13

1 Like