Updated: London Assembly dubious over cycle superhighways

Issues over safety and value for money says capital's watchdog body

by Mark Appleton   November 30, 2010  

Cycle Superhighways - indicative routes

The London Assembly, the elected body that describes itself a “watchdog for Londoners” has called into question the safety and value for money offered by the capital’s cycle superhighways.

A report entitled Pedal power: the cycle hire scheme and cycle superhighways, gives a resounding thumbs-up to the Barclays Cycle Hire scheme, suggesting that it should be expanded, while calling for further evaluation of the cycle superhighways before any further investment is made in them.

The report is based on a survey of just under 1300 Londoners responding to an online questionnaire of whom 701 had actually used the pilot superhighways.

Of those 701, 60 per cent said they did not feel safer using the routes and two-thirds did not feel they were respected by other road users.

The report says: “Greater consistency in the measures along the route would help this situation, such as a uniform width, improvements to junctions and 20 mph speed limits on busy sections.”

Based on its findings, the report makes a number of recommendations about the superhighways:

  • all the blue cycle lanes will be 2 metres wide and mandatory;
  • all the advance stop lines will be 5 metres deep;
  • all parts of the routes which are one-way will be made two-way for cyclists;
  • all junctions on each route will be improved;
  • 20 mph speed limits will be introduced for all busy sections ;
  • there will be an Met Police Cycle Task Force enforcement campaign for each cycle superhighway when launched.

The report concludes that: "There is clearly a need to learn lessons from the pilot routes before the roll-out of more cycle superhighways. There is a need to modify the approach to developing the future routes and to improve their features to ensure they are much safer and more attractive for new cyclists."

Responding to the report, a London Cycling Campaign spokesperson said: “Because of its environmental and health benefits, investment in cycling offers exceptional value for money.

"But to achieve TfL’s planned target of 160,000 more journeys as a result of the cycle hire scheme and superhighways the hire scheme needs to be expanded while the superhighways programme needs to focus on tackling road danger at gyratories and major junctions as well as reducing car speeds and volumes.”

A Transport for London spokesperson said: “We welcome the fact that the Assembly Transport Committee recognise the success of the Mayor’s flagship Barclays Cycle Hire scheme, we currently have more than 108,000 members who’ve already made more than 1.8 million journeys.

"Cycling numbers have also increased by 25 per cent along the pilot superhighway routes since they launched in July, with increases of over 90 per cent observed along some sections of route 7.”

Road.cc’s own TR McGowran uses the cycle superhighways on a daily basis and disputes the notion that riders would not feel any safer following the blue-painted routes.

“I believe that safety has been improved immensely by the superhighways, especially at junctions,” he said. “Riders are guided almost subconsciously to position themselves in the safest part of the road and cars now tend to leave a good gap on their nearside when they have to stop, so there is nearly always a passage for riders to get past.

“When friends cycle to my place in Balham they are always amazed by how easy it is to use the superhighway, and I feel the blue-painted lanes are, in themselves, a great advert for cycling.”

What about you? Are you a cycle superhighway user? Does the report tally with your experience? Let us know with a comment below.

 

3 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Can't argue with the report's recommendation for improving the routes, but I wonder if we'll ever see the day when we are prepared to invest the sorts of sums Dutch have today announced they are going to spend on new cycle routes http://road.cc/content/news/27998-dutch-invest-€80m-new-cycle-routes

Tony Farrelly's picture

posted by Tony Farrelly [4102 posts]
30th November 2010 - 17:23

like this
Like (1)

I use CS7 some of the time.
Its not bad, but some bits still need improvement (A3/A23 junction) and I still think it could end in a more useful place.

The suggestions are mostly useful but the biggest thing they could do with CS7 is stop parking on the route. Several sections are made useless by off-peak parking (Kennington Park Road) or all day parking(just before Elephant and Castle bypass southbound).

A big thumbs up to making more one-way roads two way for cyclists (The City of London is doing more on this).

My only concern is that the strip of blue means drivers seem to think cyclists should only use this and not any part of the road. Not great when the blue is not always in the best place (often too far to the left).
I've had a few runs in with drivers who have used the excuse "You weren't in your lane" to cut me up or try and bully me to the gutter.

So maybe as well as a Met Police Cycle Task Force enforcement campaign they could also run a general road rules enforcement campaign. As well as some driver education (including who can use ASLs, what space you should give when passing a cyclist, what a cycle lane with a solid white lines means etc etc).

posted by thereverent [278 posts]
30th November 2010 - 17:38

like this
Like (1)

Why does TR McGowan dispute the notion that users would not feel any safer using the routes?

Surely the fact that 60% of respondents to the survey said they felt precisely that is evidence that his own perception is a minority one?

Parking, infringement by moving motor traffic, and design faults close to junctions and roundabouts all need to be addressed. The report is clear that all these factors and others should be addressed before the next phase is implemented, rather than rushing in without learning the lessons so far.

posted by Paul M [290 posts]
30th November 2010 - 19:30

like this
Like (1)