Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

road.cc live blog: Terpstra takes E3 Harelbeke, buy Lance's house, limited edition Cannondale Supersix, bicycle-to-vehicle beacons proposed + more

All the news from this site and beyond
 

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
Eton Rifle | 6 years ago
0 likes

That Cannondale looks great.  You don't often see British Racing Green on a bike.

Avatar
Sevenfold | 6 years ago
7 likes

“It is not easy for human drivers to see cyclists on the roads" Manuel Marsilio - general manager of the Confederation for the European Bicycle Industry

Yes, actually it is QUITE easy to see cyclists on the roads IF you are paying attention & looking where you are pointing your two tonne lump of steel. With 'friends' like this in the industry, who needs enemies...

 

Avatar
jstone1 | 6 years ago
0 likes

Most people probably already have a highly detectable beacon - their phone. It's likely squawking out all sort of radio signals (WiFi, Bluetooth, ANT+, 3g/4g etc.) right now.

It's not "victim blaming" to envisage a future where road users are sharing speed, direction and position information in an effort to avoid hitting each other. It's already used extensively in the air and at sea (AIS). At sea it's mandatory for big heavy stuff to have AIS (>300t I think). E.g. http://shipfinder.co/ - and an awful lot of smaller craft use it as well along with sonar, radar and, yes, eyeballs.

Maybe Garmin will bake their LiveTrack system into all their devices in future and build automotive versions...maybe they have already.

Avatar
Kojima | 6 years ago
0 likes

On the subject of bicycle / car sensors.

Lets go a step further so the software in the car can detect dangerous overtaking distances between the two sensors, then feed this back directly to the driver's insurance provider, who can then increase their insurance premiums accordingly.

The government can offer a free standard version of the bike beacon, paid for by also offering a super-lightweight carbon fibre version for 'proper' cyclists who wouldn't be able to resist the marginal gains.

Avatar
Grahamd replied to Kojima | 6 years ago
3 likes

Kojima wrote:

On the subject of bicycle / car sensors.

Lets go a step further so the software in the car can detect dangerous overtaking distances between the two sensors, then feed this back directly to the driver's insurance provider, who can then increase their insurance premiums accordingly.

Better still, switch the car to limp home mode with a max speed of 15 mph so that affected cyclist can taunt them for miles and miles and ....

 

Avatar
Pushing50 | 6 years ago
1 like

It will not work in Colchester.

Avatar
Grahamd | 6 years ago
2 likes

Car detects bike with chip, driver ignores the warning, status quo. 

Avatar
burtthebike | 6 years ago
3 likes

This appears to be a new version of victim blaming; it'll be the cyclists fault for not fitting the latest gadget.

It is the responsibility of the people causing the danger to prevent/reduce that danger, not for cyclists and pedestrians to have to take actions to avoid being run over.  Make the vehicle technology safe or keep it off the road.

Avatar
Kendalred | 6 years ago
0 likes

Re 'Ouch'.

A Darwin Award must be in the post - especially if next time he smashes his bollocks into that wall!

Avatar
kil0ran | 6 years ago
0 likes

Seems to me that that whole thing would be monumentally hackable. The beacon will need to be small and low-powered so they'll be really easy to hide. IBM announced tech this week smaller than a grain of rice that could be used for this.

What's to stop you, for example, hiding one in a manhole cover or on a bollard and bringing traffic to a halt? 

Or taking primary and riding at 5mph preventing the vehicle from overtaking?

Its all completely unworkable and the logical extrapolation will be to ban pedestrians and cycles (and motorcycles and horses) from areas where driverless vehicles operate.

And then we get to my neck of the woods where there are unfenced roads and livestock roaming about - I guess that means they'll all need to be tagged too.

Avatar
Piece_Maker replied to kil0ran | 6 years ago
1 like

kil0ran wrote:

What's to stop you, for example, hiding one in a manhole cover or on a bollard and bringing traffic to a halt? 

Or taking primary and riding at 5mph preventing the vehicle from overtaking?

 

 

And this is exactly what we'll get if this technology becomes mainstream. There'll be places you can buy them in bulk from Chinese wholesalers, and they will be laid in weird patterns across the road to 'assist' motorists into a ditch. I could even lay them on the pavement in front of my house to stop people parking there!

Avatar
CarlosFerreiro | 6 years ago
4 likes

Sensors to also measure passing distance and batch report anything too close? 

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 6 years ago
4 likes

Why do we keep trying to invent things that dull the attention of road users? It's bad enough that most cars resemble starship command inside now. The last thing we need is going from SMIDSY to sorry my detection system didn't see you mate and besides I was looking at facebook anyway.

My brother recently moved to Australia and said the driving standard is dire over there and reckons part of it is everyone driving automatics. It's just a another level of disconnect from driving.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 6 years ago
8 likes

I'm calling bullshit on the bike detection technology. Half the time, drivers can see the bike perfectly well, but will still insist on overtaking at inappropriate times/places and without any due consideration. How will a detection system improve that?

Avatar
Paul_C | 6 years ago
0 likes

ermmm... bicycles already have retro-reflectors mounted on them... perhaps these vehicle systems 'experts' should consider devising some device which scans the field of view and detects reflected 'light'... sort of like a radar does but with an infra red low power eyesafe laser?

Avatar
pockstone | 6 years ago
6 likes

And yet, a car supposedly dripping with the latest detection technology and fail safe automated braking systems  ploughs into and kills  a pedestrian crossing the road in Arizona. ?

Avatar
Eton Rifle | 6 years ago
10 likes

I'd like to have a device on my bike that sent an electric shock to the bollocks of the driver of a car detected within a metre of my bike. Said shock to increase the closer the vehicle gets. I'd happily pay for that, in fact.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Eton Rifle | 6 years ago
6 likes

Eton Rifle wrote:

I'd like to have a device on my bike that sent an electric shock to the bollocks of the driver of a car detected within a metre of my bike. Said shock to increase the closer the vehicle gets. I'd happily pay for that, in fact.

Not a bad idea, but being run over by a woman is going to be just as annoying and painful.

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 6 years ago
7 likes

Okay, I'll bite...

Who will have to pay to retro-fit beacons to existing bikes?

Who will pay to retro-fit the detection and collision avoidance technology to all the existing cars trucks, vans, lorries, buses and taxis out there?

Who will be judged at fault in a collision between a beaconless bike and a sensor equipped vehicle?

 

 

 

Latest Comments