Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

UCI boss calls for investigation into Team Sky allegations

David Lappartient says claims in Select Committee's report are damaging for cycling, and also calls for speedy resolution to Froome case...

UCI president David Lappartient has said that the governing body should open an investigation into Team Sky to address the allegations contained in the report published this week by a House of Commons Select Committee examining how to combat doping in sport.

The report, compiled by the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, said that the UCI WorldTour outfit had crossed an “ethical line” through the use of drugs, within anti-doping rules, not for medicinal purposes but instead to enhance the performance of riders.

> Damning report from MPs slams Bradley Wiggins and Team Sky

It cited a Team Sky insider, who gave evidence anonymously, who claimed that at a training camp ahead of the 2012 Tour de France, Sir Bradley Wiggins – winner of that year’s race – and other riders took the corticosteroid triamcinolone to help improve their power-to-weight ration ahead of the race.

Lappartient, who ousted Britain’s Brian Cookson from the UCI presidency last September, with allegations of bullying and sexism at British Cycling as well as the controversy surrounding Team Sky thought to be factors in the Frenchman’s victory,  told BBC Sport’s Dan Roan that the allegations "could affect the global credibility of the sport."

He said: "If you are using substances to increase your performances, I think this is exactly what is cheating,” and would ask the Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation (CADF), which operates independently of the UCI, "to see if there is some violation of anti-doping rules.

"It's sad to see that when Team Sky was launched, I remember- they say 'we will be clean, we will win races and be clean, more white than white'. We can see in this report that it seems to be a little bit different.

"We have the Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation, they have the power of investigation. I would like them to do this, to see if there is some violation of anti-doping rules.”

Referring to Wiggins’ use of triamcinolone under a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) ahead of key races including the 2011 and 2012 Tour de France and 2013 Giro d’Italia, he said: "They had at the time the TUE agreement but now we have the evidence that it seems to be organised."

TUE rules have since been tightened up, but talking about the regime in operation at the time, Lappartient said: "Just by a letter of support from the doctor, then it was not so difficult to get the TUE, which is something completely different now.

"So you have to put this in the context of the time; the grey zone was too big and it seemed that this grey zone has been used by Team Sky at the time so, is it doping? Is it just using the rules? That is why the MPs' report just says they were not breaching the rules."

He added: "I read the press release from Team Sky saying 'look we apologise, we recognise that we made some mistakes'. A mistake is something you've done without an intention to be wrong. The report is a little bit different.

"It seems that it was a little bit organised, so it's maybe not a mistake but a fault, which is different, because that could affect the credibility globally of our sport and that's why I'm concerned about this."

The UCI president also spoke about the ongoing Chris Froome salbutamol case, and has previously said that the Tour de France and Vuelta champion should voluntarily suspend himself from racing until it is resolved.

"We need to have a decision as soon as possible for Chris Froome himself, for his team, for us, for cycling," he said.

"Of course, we have to respect the rights of Chris Froome to defend what he thinks and what he believes with experts. So that's why it's taking some time.

"I'm not sure we can have the decision before May's Giro d'Italia - I hope we can have it at least before the Tour de France in July because, can you imagine if he's riding the Giro and with spectators crying against him, or if at the end he's disqualified from the Giro - that's something difficult for our sport."

Both Wiggins and Team Sky have stronly denied the allegations contained in the Select Committe's report, while Froome is putting together a defence to try and explain how he came to be found with twice the permitted level of salbutam

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

37 comments

Avatar
doc_davo replied to psling | 6 years ago
0 likes

psling wrote:

The_Vermonter wrote:

If this forum is any indication, if the UCI found more than Parliament it would be brushed aside by many as "anti-British" or a "witchhunt" or "fake news". Is it so hard to believe that a British team could cheat just like every other nation has had doping cheats? 

I don't think that's true. What I want is fact, not insinuation. This recent report is by a group of people enjoying Parliamentary Privilege  so there is absolutely no redress against them and it is partly based on an anonymous source making unsubstantiated accusations. Nationalities don't come into it really.

As Team Sky have now said, they would welcome an UCI investigation based on fact and based on the UCI set of rules relevant at the time of any alleged misdemeaneurs. Any outcome based on fact rather than spurious insinuations would, I believe, be more readily received by the Brits on this forum.

absolutely bang on the money psling.

Avatar
doc_davo replied to HarrogateSpa | 6 years ago
0 likes

HarrogateSpa wrote:

Lappartient comes across as a man on the make, playing to a particular anti-British gallery.

its widely thought that he has mainstream political aspirations beyond just sports.

Avatar
doc_davo replied to bottechia | 6 years ago
0 likes

bottechia wrote:

How very strange that the UCI  should now question the integrity of thier own TUE process ? They should defend the the fact that an approved TUE is not doping  - otherwise what's the point of the TUE sytem  .. or... they should open up their files of all riders competing on approved TUE'S for public scrutiny. This doesn't come close to Armstong, Puerto of Festina violations - so let's get this in proportion. The UCI make the rules - and wherever the line is drawn, let's not be so naive in thinking that all teams will not be riding right on that line. In the end Bradley and Sky have to be judged against the rules of the sport made by the UCI - and to date there is NO evidence of those rules have been broken. Hang in there Brad, Dave and SKY - the select committe have expressed an opinion only. - you have every right to express the opposite opinion.

 

problem is it’s not their TUE process, a rider from Britain could apply to The UCI, The BOA, BC, the IOC and possibly even direct to WADA for a TUE (that may not be factually true, but I think it is) as Bob Howden gave the comment that BC TUE’s had reduced in number year on year, but in actual terms of British cyclists holding TUEs it wasn’t counted as may have been issued by other bodies.

worrying thing that DL says it’s possible to cheat without breaking the rules, well that my friend means your rules are wrong!!!! 

Avatar
nllsam | 6 years ago
0 likes

So on tge sat so if one anonymous source Team Sky are guilty. Niw, if you look at the 2012 TdF team and try and see who was there and, potentially doped, Cav, Eisel and Eddie Bos, would not have featured. Froome says he didn't take the drug named and Richie Porte is well known for his anti drug stance. Surely, if tgere is a smoking gun or needle filled with dope, then the remaining riders who are no longer on Sky roster might be interested in immunity for testimony. Fairly simple from my point of view then we will all know tgr case is proved or can put this thing in the bin, dependent on outcome.

Smear and inuendo as well as political ambitions are a toxic combination.

Avatar
gstuplin | 6 years ago
1 like

Thank you for taking the time to comment Doc_Davo, very informative and bang on for me. To be honest it’s the best thing I’ve read on the case. Have to cut through so much rubbish published to get an honest stand on it

Avatar
maviczap replied to gstuplin | 6 years ago
0 likes

gstuplin wrote:

Thank you for taking the time to comment Doc_Davo, very informative and bang on for me. To be honest it’s the best thing I’ve read on the case. Have to cut through so much rubbish published to get an honest stand on it

Same here, good post Doc_Davo

Really sums up my frustration with the whole report, just lazy journalists cherry picking the bits that suited their agenda.

What pissed me off was one day Dan (I hate cycling) Down interviewing Wiggins, the next day he's flown to Switzerland to interview DL and prompted him to get him to say he thought Sky  and wiggins  cheated and he'd start an investigation

Avatar
Guerch to Church | 6 years ago
0 likes

Either a substance is band or can be used for TUE, does it offer everyone a advantage if they take it. Or does it equal the field for a athlete with a ailment, not taking them beyond certain normal vitals. A serious look has to be made into catered drugs for a athlete  with a supposed ailment. Where the drug might not enhance everybody, so it's not a known enhancement. Certain substance  can't be  therapeutic and a enhancement. So the same drug might do me good and absolutely nothing for you, and you shouldn't be talking it.

Pages

Latest Comments