Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Labour pledges to spend £10 per head annually on cycling and walking if elected

Shadow transport secretary Andy McDonald makes commitment at Space for Cycling rally at party conference

Shadow transport secretary Andy McDonald has said that a future Labour government would spend £10 per person per year on cycling and walking in England.

He made the announcement at a rally organised by Cycling UK and Brighton cycle campaign group Bricycles outside the Labour Party Conference yesterday evening.

McDonald, who is MP for Middlesbrough, said: "Our country is blighted by illegal air pollution, crippling congestion and a public health crisis. Cycling and walking can holistically address all these issues in an efficient, cost-effective way.

"Labour is committed to ensuring that potential is met and is committed to revolutionising our transport system through cycling and walking."

The rally was held to highlight the Space for Cycling campaign, initially launched by the London Cycling Campaign and subsequently taken nationwide by Cycling UK, with Brighton and Hove the first city outside London to adopt it.

> Brighton becomes first council outside London to back Space for Cycling campaign

In its 2013 report Get Britain Cycling, the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group called for spend on cycling to be raised to £10 per person per year, ultimately increasing to £20,

While former Prime Minister David Cameron said in 2015 that the government planned to raise spend on cycling to £10 per person per year, the amount allocated to cycling in most of the country remains woefully short of that figure.

> David Cameron aims for £10 per person per year cycling spend – but only if economic recovery stays on track

According to Cycling UK, from 2010/11 to 22014/15, Department for Transport (DfT) per capita spend on cycling (excluding London) was £1.90 annually.

Adding in local spend the national figure was equivalent to £6.70 per person in 2015/16.

However, that figure will be skewed heavily by the inclusion of the Cycle City Ambition cities as well as London, which is home to around one in six people in England and alone has annual spend of £17 per person.

Earlier this year, the government published its long-awaited Cycling & Walking Investment Strategy, which pledged £1.2 billion to cycling and walking outside London over the next five years, which works out at a little over £5 per person per year.

> £1.2bn in funding as Government finally publishes cycling and walking investment strategy

Labour MP for Leeds North and APPCG treasurer Fabian Hamilton commented: "As a longstanding member of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group, I am thrilled to hear our shadow transport secretary pledge £10 per head for cycling and walking if elected.

“We need a radical shift in our transport system and we are committed to making sure that happens."

Cycling UK’s Space for Cycling campaigner Tom Guha added: “This is a landmark announcement from the Labour Party.

“Around the country, local political leaders have been doing their best to invest properly in cycling to unlock the many benefits it can bring.

“However, it is national funding like this that is necessary if we are to see the cycling revolution we so desperately need.”

In the Netherlands, estimated spend on cycling per head of population is £24 a year while in Denmark it is £17 – although both countries have a four decade or so head start on England in terms of building infrastructure for people on bikes. 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
Jimnm | 6 years ago
3 likes

We just want to ride bikes safely with respect and without malice from other road users, j am I correct in saying this? 

Avatar
Edgeley replied to crazy-legs | 6 years ago
2 likes

 

crazy-legs wrote:

Oh not this shit again.

I'd like to see a properly costed plan detailing what they want to create, over what timeframe and scale and then allocate money to it. NOt just go "oh we'll spend £10 per head" becasue I can guarantee it'll be spent on random crap like green paint and a job load of Cyclists Dismount signs but they'll go "oh but we spent loads of money..."

If your plan to build x, y and z costs £7.38 per head then that's great, if it costs £10.42 a head then find that extra 42p but don't just spend £10 per head on random shite. Give us the proper plan first.

 

It is local authorities that will spend any money and not  central government.    Round these parts, the local authority managed to spend £1m on a "bike scheme" that was really a means to make buses go faster.    It wasn't a bad scheme, but cyclists certainly didn't get £1m of benefits.

 

The Plain in Oxford.  As reported here, among other places.

Avatar
TriTaxMan replied to barbarus | 6 years ago
2 likes

barbarus wrote:
mike the bike wrote:

Don't know if you've been voting for the last fifty years Burt, but I have and, try as I might , I can't think of an exception to the first rule of British politics: all socialist governments end in a financial crisis.  And so I'm filing this one alongside Gordon Brown's 2006 promise to "end boom and bust", the fullfilment of which I keenly await.

Not this shit again. http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2016/03/13/the-conservatives-have-bee... I can't boast a 50 year voting record but I do notice that conservative administrations tend to end with a crisis in public services and underspend on infrastructure.

I'm going to say something controversial. 

Yes the conservatives borrow more money....but before it is lambasted... just bear in mind many fiscal policies take several years before their full outcomes are felt.  Commitments to spend money made by one government are often funded and resultant borrowing incurred by the successive government.  i.e. borrowing incurred by one political party is quite often as a direct result of decisions made by the previous government.

In much the same way that Trump has been boasting in the US that his government is seeing massive falls in unemployment, however, this is before any of his policies have had a chance to make an impact.

I also echo concerns of stating an arbitrary figure to spend on cycling, with no real plans as to what will be done.  

Avatar
davel | 6 years ago
2 likes

Ernest Marples. End of.

Avatar
zanf replied to davel | 6 years ago
0 likes

davel wrote:

Ernest Marples. End of.

For those that dont know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Marples#Business_interests

Pages

Latest Comments