CTC joins RoSPA and others in urging councils to rethink speed camera switch-off
Road safety organisations call for public debate on issue before cameras turned off
National cyclists organisation CTC has joined forces with the The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) and several other road safety and motoring organisations to urge councils to reconsider abandoning speed cameras as a result of budget cuts.
As reported here on road.cc in the past fortnight, a number of councils are considering either switching off all of their speed cameras, as Swindon and Oxfordshire have already done, or reducing their use of them as a result of the coalition government’s decision to slash the Road Safety Grant, which helps fund the cameras, by 40%.
RoSPA, which has produced a document called Ten Reasons to Maintain Speed Camera Enforcement has been in touch with other organisations concerned with road safety, including CTC, and has published a joint communiqué to councils considering turning off their cameras.
Other co-signatories to the communiqué are representatives from the AA, the Association of Industrial Road Safety Officers, GEM Motoring Assist, the Institute of Road Safety Officers, the London Road Safety Council, the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety and Road Safety GB.
RoSPA says that before decisions to switch off or scale down the use of speed cameras are taken, the organisations signing the communiqué “want to raise public awareness, demonstrate unity and feed the wider debate with facts.”
The full text of the communiqué is as follows:
Speed Cameras Communiqué: issued by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents on behalf of the undersigned on Tuesday, August 24, 2010.
We the undersigned agree that:
Speed cameras help to save lives - an estimated 100 lives a year in the UK.
Lives are saved by reducing speeding. Speeding significantly increases the risk of an accident happening; and also increases the severity of injuries in an accident.
Cameras should continue to be used where casualty statistics show they are needed.
Switching off cameras systematically would be close to creating a void in law enforcement on the road. Cameras currently account for 84 per cent of fixed penalty notices for speeding.
Cuts might also threaten many speed awareness courses that give motorists an opportunity to learn about the dangers of driving too fast.
While public spending needs to be cut, cuts must be justified by evidence. Cameras pay for themselves and currently make an important contribution to achieving compliance with the speed limit.
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA): Tom Mullarkey MBE, Chief Executive
The AA: Edmund King, President
Association of Industrial Road Safety Officers (AIRSO): Graham Feest, Secretary
CTC - the UK’s National Cyclists’ Organisation: Kevin Mayne, Chief Executive
GEM Motoring Assist: David Williams MBE FIRSO, Chief Executive
Institute of Road Safety Officers: Darren Divall, Chairman
London Road Safety Council: Councillor Peter Herrington, Chairman
Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS): Robert Gifford, Executive Director
Road Safety GB: Alan Kennedy, Chairman