Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

UPDATED: Daily Mail 'exposes' Jon Snow as serial rule-breaker

CTC president fights back after he’s accused of flouting rules; now also with CTC comment

The Daily Mail has run an article they say exposes CTC president Jon Snow as a serial rule-breaker during a three-mile bike ride from Channel 4 news HQ to his home.

But Snow has described the paper as ‘at best, cycling challenged’ and rejects the accusations levelled at him.

The article, headlined Drivers beware: How news presenter Jon Snow flouts the rules of cycle safety, begins, “As figurehead of a society which represents the interests of Britain’s 20million cyclists, news presenter Jon Snow might be expected to set an example behind the handlebars.

“And indeed he does. A bad one.

“Despite being a vocal campaigner for cycle safety, the 62-year-old flouts the rules with astonishing regularity.”

A photographer at least must have followed the newsreader for the three-mile journey to his home – via a pub quiz – because the article then catalogues a series of transgressions, with supporting photos.

They include not stopping at red lights, riding on the pavement, failing to stop at a box junction to allow an oncoming ambulance to pass, failing to stop at a zebra crossing, and using his mobile while cycling – including apparently sending a text.

The Mail fulsomely describes each incident in an increasingly sanctimonious tone and with barely concealed glee, saying, for example, “As he darted in and out of incoming traffic on his mountain bike in his suit, his ankle clips revealing his trademark fluorescent socks, he seemed oblivious to the taxis and lorries thundering close by him.”

It’s not made clear how the photographer kept up with Snow – presumably by jumping the same red lights.

In response, an unrepentant Snow said those responsible for the story were ‘at best, cycling challenged’. He told road.cc, “In the first picture I am leaving the hoops I had parked on. In the other pavement shot I am arriving at railings to which the photographer would have seen me secure the bike – you can see the top of my leg swinging over the saddle preparatory to parking.

“It is alas NOT illegal to use a mobile on a bike (but should be!)

“The red lights I was well past when they turned red and the ambulance I obviously stopped for. I regret nothing beyond the reality that in common with America and many other countries we need a serious national cycling strategy and REAL provision for cycle use.”

A CTC spokesperson said, "CTC - the UK's national cyclists' organisation does not condone law-breaking by either cyclists or motorists on our roads. This is why we campaign for an increase in traffic police to ensure all types of road users don't break the law. However, before we point the finger at Jon Snow, it is important to remember that cyclists in urban areas are less likely than drivers to be involved in a collision that injures another road user and the difference is even greater when it comes to serious and fatal injuries.

“Just like Boris Johnson and David Cameron before him, Jon Snow appears to be singled out, as if he is the only person on the roads breaking the Highway Code. To be fair, we would also like the popular media to turn their attention to those motorists who don't abide by the rules of the road. If any reporters were followed driving home, CTC would be amazed if they all followed the Highway Code perfectly."

The article generated the usual flood of self-righteous commentary from Daily Mail readers. Among the more entertaining is this one, from ‘Trillian’ in Bristol, “This man is a hypocrite of the highest order. Just typical from the self confessed 'pinko-liberal' – quite happy to rake in a very large salary, marry in a millionaires playground and flout the rules of the road whilst publicly espousing road safety. Doesn't sound very 'for the people' to me! Maybe he took a leaf out of New Labours book. Thank god they're gone...”

Lifelong lover of most things cycling-related, from Moulton Mini adventures in the 70s to London bike messengering in the 80s, commuting in the 90s, mountain biking in the noughties and road cycling throughout. Editor of Simpson Magazine (www.simpsonmagazine.cc). 

Add new comment

37 comments

Avatar
cat1commuter | 13 years ago
0 likes

In Japan cyclists share the pavement with pedestrians. But there is concern about the number of pedestrian + cyclist accidents, and people cycle slowly, and the culture of politeness is very different to London!

Avatar
Martin Thomas replied to dave atkinson | 13 years ago
0 likes
dave_atkinson wrote:

i don't agree with your statement that cyclists and pedestrians can't use shared space, though. they can, and do, all over the world, all the time. part of my commute is on a shared path. it's really not that hard, all that's needed is a bit of mutual respect and to slow down a bit...

I've been mulling this one over...not sure I agree (apart from the last bit, which is spot on). I think there are some variables - perhaps including volumes of traffic (both cyclist and pedestrian) and maybe distractions too - that cause this common sense model to break.

Case in point: the promenade in Brighton has a wide, clearly marked cycle path running along its entire length, right next to the even wider pedestrian bit. There's ample room for both and yet you'll always see pedestrians ambling along in the bike lane and cyclists on the pedestrian bit. Generally speaking, cyclists don't stop at the give way signs where the road crossings are and generally speaking pedestrians don't look before stepping across the bike lane to cross the road. There are regular collisions - some serious - much bad feeling and frequent exchanges of fruity language. But among the things you see depressingly rarely are tolerance and common courtesy.

I don't know why it should be so bad down here - perhaps it's because there's so much to distract the eye along the seafront. But whatever the reason it's a depressing business and it seems to be getting worse. I gave way at a pedestrian crossing down there this morning (which I don't always do, to my shame) and the pedestrian was so shocked when I waved him through with a smile that he froze on the spot, clearly expecting me to change my mind and run him down like a dog.

Avatar
dave atkinson | 13 years ago
0 likes

martin - part of the problem on routes like that for me is that when there are clearly defined pedestrian and cyclist bits everyone's too busy worrying about their 'rights' to think about their responsibilities.

the least stressful shared spaces are the ones that are properly shared. the canal path is a case in point: i might not agree with the way that other people use the path, but in the end that's neither here nor there. if there was a dedicated cycling bit and people walking in it i might feel the need to exercise my 'right' to be there, as it is everyone just has to get along. there's still some idiots, but it works pretty well. the bristol-bath is the same. with a few more idiots.

the concept of sharing transport space is alien to people who solely use motor vehicles, as the road system is based on rigid priorities and control, rather than mutual respect. people will speed up in their car to close off a gap and sit in a queue, stopping other cars from entering the queue, because it's their 'right of way'. I've seen someone deliberately crash into another vehicle to prove a point.

Avatar
Martin Thomas | 13 years ago
0 likes

Good point Dave...I was chatting to a lorry driver the other day (as you do) and he was advocating dispensing with all road markings, traffic lights etc to force all road users to exercise a bit of judgement rather than focusing blindly on the rules and their rights. Apparently this was tried somewhere (Scandinavia? can't remember) and it worked a treat.

Avatar
TiNuts replied to handlebarcam | 13 years ago
0 likes
handlebarcam wrote:

You literally couldn't pay me enough to move back to London now.)

Loved the Alexander Herzen quote. Your post was spot on - there is a lack of consideration for others in London that really is unsurpassed, in my experience, in the rest of the UK. Yes, the culture of "Get out of my way!" is alive and thriving in the great metropolis - whatever your chosen mode of transport.

Avatar
Simon E | 13 years ago
0 likes

Re. chris-grays-inn-road's long piece, I think the responses are fair, and suggest that pavement cyclists, while a real issue for some people, get disproportionate exposure. I'm afraid there are idiots and selfish people in all walks of life and they aren't going to change.

London appears to me to be an alien place. It's the only city I've been to where addressing a stranger, however fleetingly, is seen as odd or unwelcome. I'd happily never go there again. How anyone could prefer living there over anywhere else is beyond me.

Shared paths are fine if you want to amble along at walking pace. For anyone trying to get from A to B more than 5mph they're literally (physically) hard work. Irresponsible dog owners with retractable dog leads, in particular, but I don't see the point of writing on Dog Owner forums about someone whose stupidity could have had me off my bike. I'd prefer those paths to be segregated by a kerb or similar clear demarcation; a line of white paint down the middle obviously means nothing to most people.

Avatar
arfa | 10 years ago
0 likes

For those that think stereotyping or "one tribe" bucketing doesn't matter I have to question whether you are regularly out there on a bike commuting. I have lost count of the times when I have been lawfully making my way and been cut up, forced off the road or had to take rapid evasive action from criminally sub standard driving to be met with abuse along the lines of "you lot don't stop/jump lights/ride on pavements have got it coming/shut your face hypocrite" etc. I'd like to know in what way stereotyping isn't reinforcing contempt from some of the most dangerous road users against the more vulnerable?
I rarely see car drivers out there policing each other and am not sure why the same is expected of "people on bicycles".

Pages

Latest Comments