Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

"Selfish cyclists" blamed for litter that caused Richmond Park deer deaths

Energy gel wrappers from organised events identified as being a particular problem

Richmond Park conservationists have asked cyclists taking part in organised events to dispose of litter more responsibly. Recent post-mortems of some deer found their stomachs contained a large volume of litter that could not be digested and which then denied the animals the nutrition they needed.

It is estimated that around five deer a year are killed as a result of eating discarded rubbish and The London Evening Standard reports that events such as RideLondon and the London Duathlon have been identified as times when a lot of gel wrappers and the like are discarded.

Richard Gray, trustee of the Friends of Richmond Park, said:

“It’s a real health issue. What we have identified with these two particular races is this phenomenon of the gel packs. Lots of our members are cyclists, I’m a cyclist, but you get a number of slightly more selfish cyclists who aren’t getting rid of it responsibly.

“They are doing the Tour de France thing, seeing people tear off their gel packs and spitting them out. But unlike other races, it doesn’t get picked up. It’s a new phenomenon, particularly because so many more people are taking up competitive endurance cycling and use gel packs.”

Friends of Richmond Park said they found 182 gel wrappers and opening strips in just 600m after RideLondon passed through in July. A similar exercise following the London Duathlon on Sunday saw more than 160 empty gel packs left behind in the same area.

RideLondon organisers admitted there had been a communication issue with litter patrol teams after this year's event but also said they were considering installing cameras on the route next year to identify and ban those who litter.

Friends of Richmond Park chairman Ron Crompton welcomed greater prevention measures and said he hoped that the duathlon organisers would also make efforts to ensure that all competitors were clear that this sort of behaviour was unacceptable.

“Finding this large extent of litter 24 hours after the event is very worrying for the Park's wildlife and particularly the deer.  The irresponsible disposal of gel energy bar packaging and their tear-off opening strips seem to be creating a particular problem,” he said.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

68 comments

Avatar
Veloism | 7 years ago
2 likes

It would be interesting to see the evidence that cyclists are to blame, or it's just trash from the general public. That being said, there's no excuse for throwing gel wrappers on the floor.

SiS, High5 and the like market their gels and advise having 'one every 20 minutes' which is obviously quite retarded. Gels should be only for emergencies, not for a 20k cafe run.

Avatar
surly_by_name | 7 years ago
1 like

We've already done this one. The FORP are enemies of cycling in the park. This is more of their fact free propaganda designed to maintain a constant level of background "no" to any proposal that involves a use of the park that they don't agree with. 

Among other things, is there any evidence that the deer the subject of the post mortem were killed by the litter in their stomachs? Any attempt made to separate causation from correlation?

The FORP are just as selfish as the people they complain about.

Avatar
stefv replied to Awavey | 7 years ago
3 likes

Awavey wrote:

Because if they are that hungry and need energy after just 20miles,I'm not sure how they expect to get to the finish,and gels don't provide instant energy boosts they don't work like that, it can take 15+ mins to digest a gel properly,

So, if they are one of the medium-fast riders (approx 5 hours), they will be 1h in and the gel will be absorbed 1h20 in to a 5 hour ride. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

Avatar
surly_by_name | 7 years ago
3 likes

Two other things:

  • Can we stop it with the "I know all about nutrition strategy and anyone who dares to ingest a gel before [ever/300km] should have their bike taken off them". Do your own thing. Let other people do their own thing.
  • It is unfortunate that a story which is negative about cyclists/cycling was accompanied by a photo of a rider in London Dynamo kit. In my experience (I was a member for a period several years ago) the 'Mos are some of the most law abiding cyclists I have ever had the pleasure of riding with and there's lots of good old fashioned club peer pressure on all riders to do the right thing. Would be unfortunate if they were viewed as being guilty by association.
Avatar
A2thaJ replied to Awavey | 7 years ago
0 likes

Awavey wrote:
Leviathan wrote:

A2thaJ wrote:

I don't understand why people were using Gels at that stage of ride london ( and i dont actually understand why people would use a gel when its not an actual race, where you get points etc).

Because they are hungry/need energy perhaps. Richmond Park is 20 miles into the event. Everyone else isn't as imperious as yourself.* What difference does it make that it isn't a race (which it is because it is a timed cycling event, you mean it is not a criterium.

Because if they are that hungry and need energy after just 20miles,I'm not sure how they expect to get to the finish,and gels don't provide instant energy boosts they don't work like that, it can take 15+ mins to digest a gel properly,and for the glycogen to be absorbed as muscle fuel,it might perk the brain up via the sugar hit, but the legs still won't be working properly.I simply think people use gels in sportives because they see Pro's use them in races, but they've next to no understanding of how,why or when they work, or that there's a stack of other stuff that's just as effective That aside I don't think they alone are responsible for these animal deaths,so it's totally unfair to single out cycling as a sole contributor

 

I wasn't trying to come across as imperious.... I just feel that as a sportive, it isn't a race... and after 20 miles of a sportive, a gel is not really what anyone needs. The presence of a clock does not make a race.

 

The point i was trying to make is, If they are hungry or need energy, actual normal food would be what they need at that point. For me, sportives should be about cruising around, enjoying the ride, having a flapjack at a feedstation. Its not about pretending i'm in a race when i'm not, and mimicing professional cyclists at a quarter of the pace.

 

Plus, to drop litter at that point of the route is bizare... if you must drop litter (which you musn't), do it on the hammersmith flyover or some over dual carriage way. Try to restrain from littering in the wildlife park bit. Or just put it in your pocket and then in a bin.

Avatar
McVittees replied to Awavey | 7 years ago
0 likes

Awavey wrote:
Leviathan wrote:

A2thaJ wrote:

I don't understand why people were using Gels at that stage of ride london ( and i dont actually understand why people would use a gel when its not an actual race, where you get points etc).

Because they are hungry/need energy perhaps. Richmond Park is 20 miles into the event. Everyone else isn't as imperious as yourself.* What difference does it make that it isn't a race (which it is because it is a timed cycling event, you mean it is not a criterium.

Because if they are that hungry and need energy after just 20miles,I'm not sure how they expect to get to the finish,and gels don't provide instant energy boosts they don't work like that, it can take 15+ mins to digest a gel properly,and for the glycogen to be absorbed as muscle fuel,it might perk the brain up via the sugar hit, but the legs still won't be working properly.

Maybe they're having one before they're hungry.  Isn't that exactly when they're supposed to be used? Let people decided how they want to ride their sportives themselves.  How you think it should be riden isn't necessarily how everyone else thinks it should.

A2thaJ wrote:

Plus, to drop litter at that point of the route is bizare... if you must drop litter (which you musn't), do it on the hammersmith flyover or some over dual carriage way. Try to restrain from littering in the wildlife park bit. Or just put it in your pocket and then in a bin.

Agreed.

Avatar
surly_by_name replied to A2thaJ | 7 years ago
2 likes

A2thaJ wrote:

For me, sportives should be about cruising around, enjoying the ride, having a flapjack at a feedstation. Its not about pretending i'm in a race when i'm not, and mimicing professional cyclists at a quarter of the pace.

Cool - for you. But other people have their own motivations, which are no less valid than yours. If someone wants to ride as fast as they can (or even just a bit faster than their mates), and if they think getting sugar in via gels helps them do this, good on them.

Avatar
bikebot replied to surly_by_name | 7 years ago
2 likes

surly_by_name wrote:

Can we stop it with the "I know all about nutrition strategy and anyone who dares to ingest a gel before [ever/300km] should have their bike taken off them". Do your own thing. Let other people do their own thing.

It's a response to an awful lot of marketing gumpf and event sponsorship telling people what their nutritional strategy should be.  Two minutes talking to your dentist should put most people off gels for good.

 

Avatar
Nick T | 7 years ago
2 likes

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

Avatar
esnifador replied to Nick T | 7 years ago
2 likes

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

It means you should consult a doctor immediately.

Avatar
tritecommentbot replied to Nick T | 7 years ago
2 likes

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

That you need to grow a pair? blush

 

Try this:

Get up on Saturday morning and go for an uninterrupted 120 mile ride in Zone 3 to Zone 4 with just your bottle of water.

 

People use fast absorbing carb sources for really good reason. You'll can tell us why when you're back on Sat.

 

Avatar
tonylemesmer | 7 years ago
0 likes

The word "cyclist" doesn't even appear in the FRP press release. Move along.

Avatar
bikebot replied to tonylemesmer | 7 years ago
0 likes

tonylemesmer wrote:

The word "cyclist" doesn't even appear in the FRP press release. Move along.

Apart from...

//i.imgur.com/OApMBQl.jpg)

 

Avatar
Nick T replied to tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
1 like

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

That you need to grow a pair? blush

 

Try this:

Get up on Saturday morning and go for an uninterrupted 120 mile ride in Zone 3 to Zone 4 with just your bottle of water.

 

People use fast absorbing carb sources for really good reason. You'll can tell us why when you're back on Sat.

 

 

why would I do that? That's just bad planning. I'd probably have a breakfast first, and take a banana. 

Avatar
bikebot replied to Nick T | 7 years ago
1 like

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

Was it a sports nutrition burrito with added science?

Avatar
CStar | 7 years ago
1 like

I hate litter bugs, but as some who took part in the Duathlon last sunday, I can confirm that there were plenty of warnings and signs about not dropping litter both in the pre-race info and around the course.

Inevitably a few are going to come out of people's pockets accidentally during the race and I know the organisers had litter pickers out. My wife worked at Richmond Park and it would have been an absolute condition of the licence that a post-race sweep be carried out. If FoRP set out to find gel packets on the course during the race then of course they are going to find them, but I suspect that they wouldn't find any after the race at all.

 

As for the 'I'm so 'ard I don't need gels' brigade, well good for you Mr superhuman, but for many people the Duathlon/ ultra-duathlon is a high intensity effort for several hours and refuelling is important. There is 15-30K of serious running involved, never mind just poncing about on your bike for a few hours  3

Avatar
Nick T replied to CStar | 7 years ago
0 likes

CStar wrote:

 

As for the 'I'm so 'ard I don't need gels' brigade, well good for you Mr superhuman, but for many people the Duathlon/ ultra-duathlon is a high intensity effort for several hours and refuelling is important. There is 15-30K of serious running involved, never mind just poncing about on your bike for a few hours  3

What time does the ultra-duathlon start in Richmond Park? Might give it a go, but all I see is folks cruising at about 28kph whenever I go. I tell a lie, the guy sitting on your wheel usually gives it the beans going down Sawyers. 

Avatar
gonedownhill replied to Nick T | 7 years ago
4 likes

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

 

A rank, lingering taste in the mouth.

Avatar
tritecommentbot replied to Nick T | 7 years ago
2 likes

Nick T wrote:

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

That you need to grow a pair? blush

 

Try this:

Get up on Saturday morning and go for an uninterrupted 120 mile ride in Zone 3 to Zone 4 with just your bottle of water.

 

People use fast absorbing carb sources for really good reason. You'll can tell us why when you're back on Sat.

 

 

why would I do that? That's just bad planning. I'd probably have a breakfast first, and take a banana. 

 

Go on then. This saturday. Breakfast, take your banana, water and do a 100mile + ride at Z3 to 4.

Lets see your Strava when you're done. Seriously do it. 

 

Not like it's a big deal, just go out on your bike on the weekend and record the ride with a heart rate monitor on, so no problem. 

 

Can we count on you to ride your bike?

Avatar
Nick T replied to tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
2 likes

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

That you need to grow a pair? blush

 

Try this:

Get up on Saturday morning and go for an uninterrupted 120 mile ride in Zone 3 to Zone 4 with just your bottle of water.

 

People use fast absorbing carb sources for really good reason. You'll can tell us why when you're back on Sat.

 

 

why would I do that? That's just bad planning. I'd probably have a breakfast first, and take a banana. 

 

Go on then. This saturday. Breakfast, take your banana, water and do a 100mile + ride at Z3 to 4.

Lets see your Strava when you're done. Seriously do it. 

 

Not like it's a big deal, just go out on your bike on the weekend and record the ride with a heart rate monitor on, so no problem. 

 

Can we count on you to ride your bike?

 

why are you so keen on me doing this? Are you employed by the Gel Defence Force? I never said they were bad guv'nor, just that I've never needed one. 

 

If I had a 120 mile ride planned, I'd take some food. Your nonsense challenge is about as unrelated to my statement as it's possible to be. 

Avatar
tritecommentbot replied to Nick T | 7 years ago
2 likes

Nick T wrote:

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

That you need to grow a pair? blush

 

Try this:

Get up on Saturday morning and go for an uninterrupted 120 mile ride in Zone 3 to Zone 4 with just your bottle of water.

 

People use fast absorbing carb sources for really good reason. You'll can tell us why when you're back on Sat.

 

 

why would I do that? That's just bad planning. I'd probably have a breakfast first, and take a banana. 

 

Go on then. This saturday. Breakfast, take your banana, water and do a 100mile + ride at Z3 to 4.

Lets see your Strava when you're done. Seriously do it. 

 

Not like it's a big deal, just go out on your bike on the weekend and record the ride with a heart rate monitor on, so no problem. 

 

Can we count on you to ride your bike?

 

why are you so keen on me doing this? Are you employed by the Gel Defence Force? I never said they were bad guv'nor, just that I've never needed one. 

 

If I had a 120 mile ride planned, I'd take some food. Your nonsense challenge is about as unrelated to my statement as it's possible to be. 

 

Nonsense = Are you employed by the Gel Defence Force?

Sensible = asking someone who says they never needed a gel to go for a big ride to find out why. 

 

Let me just spell out what the rest of us were thinking when we read your original comment. "This guy and his burritos thinks he's clever but just marked himself out as someone who doesn't do long threshold or tempo efforts and doesn't understand the basic science behind carb absorption/limits."

 

I wasn't keen on you  doing it because you and your banana skin would be stuck in the middle of nowhere.

Avatar
flathunt | 7 years ago
2 likes

Zip them up chaps, you'll have someone's eye out.

Avatar
Nick T | 7 years ago
2 likes

Awfully sorry Captain Sensible, as you were. 

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to CXR94Di2 | 7 years ago
1 like
CXR94Di2 wrote:

Traveling around Europe, makes you realise the UK is a filthy, littered place to live.  It has the unenviable title of being the grubbiest country in Europe, sad, but true.

 The likes of Germany, Austria, Denmark and Norway are so clean, I am always so embarrased when I return home to see litter down the side of roads, in rivers, carparks and even around bins.  How difficult is it put it in the bin properly.

The problem with that point, though, is that half the population of London are foriegn-born, a large proportion of them from other parts of Europe.

Certainly, at least when it comes to leaving empty cans and bottles around, some of the biggest litterers round here are the Polish street drinkers (nothing against them, generally, but I see no sign whatsoever that they are any better at putting things in bins than are native-born Londoners).

So if London has a litter problem, it has to be about something other than just the national characteristics of the residents. Either everyone quickly 'goes native' when they arrive here, or its more about councils failing to clean things up (or to provide bins to put things in in the first place).

Avatar
Leviathan replied to Simon E | 7 years ago
1 like

Simon E wrote:

Classy sign-off, that must have taken a while to think up.

So the fact that wildlife doesn't know why a gel wrapper isn't edible means it's OK for them to choke on it? I guess the same applies to the 90% of all seabird species, 22% of large marine mammals, all sea turtle species, and an increasing number of fish that have been found to have plastic in or around their bodies.

Yes it would be a good idea for volunteer marshals to collect the litter after standing around for hours. Why don't you put your name forward? It's the lazy option to always expect it to be done yet never help out, as so many people do.  Though it would be better if people weren't so fucking selfish and pocketed their gel wrappers etc instead of tossing it over their shoulder and expecting someone else (or the deer) to tidy up after them.

Simon, you are just the sort of imperious cock I am telling to eff off. You are actually agreeing with me that the litter could be collected; yet concocted some fantasy that I think it okay for it to be eaten by wildlife. It will be eaten, thats the point. 

If you stopped wasting your time reading between the lines and coming up with snarky responses you might be of some use for something. I have never seen you contibute a single new topic or thread to this forum, you just like to sit at the back of the bus sniping. Boring.

Avatar
freespirit1 replied to Leviathan | 7 years ago
0 likes

Leviathan wrote:

A2thaJ wrote:

I don't understand why people were using Gels at that stage of ride london ( and i dont actually understand why people would use a gel when its not an actual race, where you get points etc).

What difference does it make that it isn't a race (which it is because it is a timed cycling event, you mean it is not a criterium.) 

 

 

Quite a big difference actually, as if it is a race ONE police officer can call the event off.

 

It is classed as a sportive to avoid the problems with Plod.  

Who deserves the asterisk in your original post now?

Avatar
freespirit1 replied to freespirit1 | 7 years ago
0 likes

.

Avatar
Simon E replied to Nick T | 7 years ago
1 like

Nick T wrote:

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

That you need to grow a pair? blush

 

Try this:

Get up on Saturday morning and go for an uninterrupted 120 mile ride in Zone 3 to Zone 4 with just your bottle of water.

 

People use fast absorbing carb sources for really good reason. You'll can tell us why when you're back on Sat.

 

 

why would I do that?

You wouldn't. He's just being an arse.

Even a top time triallist wouldn't ride 100 miles that way. Based on that post it makes me think that either he's being provocative or possibly doesn't even understand what the zones mean.

Avatar
tritecommentbot replied to Simon E | 7 years ago
2 likes

Simon E wrote:

Nick T wrote:

unconstituted wrote:

Nick T wrote:

I've never had a gel. What am I missing? I did 115km this morning with only a bottle of water. Should I have had a gel? I was pretty hungry when I got home, so I had a burrito for lunch. What does that mean?

That you need to grow a pair? blush

 

Try this:

Get up on Saturday morning and go for an uninterrupted 120 mile ride in Zone 3 to Zone 4 with just your bottle of water.

 

People use fast absorbing carb sources for really good reason. You'll can tell us why when you're back on Sat.

 

 

why would I do that?

You wouldn't. He's just being an arse.

Even a top time triallist wouldn't ride 100 miles that way. Based on that post it makes me think that either he's being provocative or possibly doesn't even understand what the zones mean.

 

Yeah, why would anyone go for  bike ride on a Saturday? Better to whine about people using gels on forums.

 

But he's not interesting, just a wise guy that got called out acting kewl.

So tell us, oh expert in heart rate zones, a top time trialist wouldn't ride between zones 3 to 4?

Now you're going to have to qualify that. 

This ought to be good.

Avatar
Simon E replied to tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
2 likes

unconstituted wrote:

So tell us, oh expert in heart rate zones, a top time trialist wouldn't ride between zones 3 to 4?

Now you're going to have to qualify that. 

This ought to be good.

Nice try!

I'm not going have to qualify anything.

Since you seemed to be telling the previous poster what to do and in which zones to ride 120 miles I thought you must surely know it all, so there's no point me trying to help you. Blimey, I'd never claim to be an expert on anything, no-one would believe me if I did!

Pages

Latest Comments