Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

13 years for driver high on TEN drugs who killed cyclist

Melinda Woodall said she was distracted by her passengers when she hit man in bike lane

A driver who hit and killed a cyclist while high on 10 different drugs has been sentenced to 13 years in jail.

Melinda Woodall, aged 34, hit Michael Prater on Kellogg Avenue in Cincinnati in January before fleeing the scene.

The windscreen was crushed in the impact with his head and the victim’s hair was found inside the car itself.

"These pictures, your honor, show she knew she hit a human being and left him by the side of the road to die like an animal,” the prosecutor told Woodall’s trial jury.

Woodall called it: ”a horrible mistake I will pay for the rest of my life,” according to WCPO.

Woodall had taken a cocktail of prescription pills, and was found with five syringes that had contained drugs, and a metal spoon and tourniquet. She admitted heroin use to the police.

She said that passengers in the back of her car were distracting her, and denied that the drug use was a factor. She said that she panicked and fled following the collision.

Woodall read a statement in court, saying: ”Every time I have a conversation with my family or my children makes me think how the Prater family is left wishing how they could hear their loved ones voice.”

But Michael Prater’s family said the collision, in which the victim was riding in a bike lane, was ‘senseless’.

"She hasn't had a license for a long time - she continued to drive," said Steve Magas. "She had a history of drug abuse for a long time - she continued to drive. This crash was just waiting to happen.”

Cincinnati's cycling community has dedicated a ghost bike to remind motorists of Michael’s fate.

"We need to study and learn from it, move forward and work to make sure that things like this don't happen again," said Frank Henson of Queen City Bike.

 

Add new comment

9 comments

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
1 like

The story does raise questions about the efficacy of driving bans, though. The victims family say that the driver hadn't had a licence for years, and she only got picked up because she was involved in this collision: how long would she have continued to drive without a licence (or insurance, presumably it's the same in the US as in the UK?) if this hadn't happened?

Maybe a driving licence ought to grant you an "ignition code" so your car won't start unless the driver has a valid licence? Another thing that will become moot when self-driving cars are (finally) rolled out.

Avatar
garuda replied to brooksby | 7 years ago
1 like

brooksby wrote:

The story does raise questions about the efficacy of driving bans, though. The victims family say that the driver hadn't had a licence for years, and she only got picked up because she was involved in this collision: how long would she have continued to drive without a licence (or insurance, presumably it's the same in the US as in the UK?) if this hadn't happened?

Maybe a driving licence ought to grant you an "ignition code" so your car won't start unless the driver has a valid licence? Another thing that will become moot when self-driving cars are (finally) rolled out.

correct. Driving bans have been shown in texas to be 12% effective. Shockingly, those who were misbehaving in the driver's seat badly enough to get prosecuted (which is exceedingly hard to do) are apparently going to misbehave in the driver's seat again. 

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
0 likes

"was distracted by her passengers" - well then all passengers should be banned from motor vehicles, as they are clearly a health and safety nightmare...

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid | 7 years ago
2 likes

If this happened in the UK this woman would get less than 5 years after unscrupulously trying every trick in the book to dodge her responsibility.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Russell Orgazoid | 7 years ago
2 likes

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

If this happened in the UK this woman would get less than 5 years after unscrupulously trying every trick in the book to dodge her responsibility.

LESS than five years?  Surely you mean this woman wouldn't get five years?  And she wouldn't even go to jail if the judge has a bit of an off day.

 

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 7 years ago
1 like

Huge sympathies to the victim's family and hoping that the druggie gets the help that she clearly needs.

 

Avatar
harrybav | 7 years ago
1 like

 

Takeaway message:

A thing happened in America, 100 million people away from me. And a guy 30 million people away likes to rant about "welfare".

Life too short, Adblock back on.

 

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
0 likes

What out in 6 or so to pick up welfare and spend it on booze?

 

Hardly what I'd call paying for it.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
6 likes

Woodall called it: ”a horrible mistake I will pay for the rest of my life,”

 

No, I call it an utter lack of responsibility which you have turned into something bad for you. 

 

Should be " completely my fault and they paid for it with their life"

Latest Comments