Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Three years for motorist who injured cyclist

Bishop Auckland driver ‘appeared heavily intoxicated’

An unlicensed motorist responsible for a hit-and-run collision with a cyclist has been jailed for three years and banned from driving for three years on his release. John Wilson admitted causing serious injury by dangerous driving, failing to provide a blood specimen for analysis and driving without a licence.

The Northern Echo reports that the incident took place on the Woodhouse Close Estate in Bishop Auckland on May 17.

Concern had been raised over the manner of Wilson’s driving earlier in the day and when police came across his Vauxhall Astra shortly before 10am, it was driven off “at speed” despite officers deploying the police light and siren.

Cement mixer driver jailed for causing death of Northamptonshire cyclist through careless driving

Prosecuting, Rachael Masters said that Wilson made late turns and drove on the wrong side of the road, causing other motorists to take evading action. At one point, he hit a 27-year-old cyclist, who suffered fractures to the neck and pelvis, as well as multiple abrasions and scalp lacerations. The pursuing officer stopped to help the victim until paramedics arrived on the scene.

The cyclist, who has no memory of the incident, was taken to James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough and is now awaiting neurological tests.

Recorder Anton Lodge told Wilson: “Having crashed into that cyclist and caused him to be thrown into the air, you drove off, without giving a care for how he was.”

At some point after the collision, the Astra was found abandoned, Wilson having crashed into the fence of a house in St Helen Auckland. He was then arrested at a nearby farm.

Police said he appeared heavily intoxicated, although not through alcohol. Masters said his speech had been slurred and that he failed a ‘straight leg’ test.

While Wilson also didn’t test positive for cocaine or cannabis, he refused to give a blood sample which would have allowed for testing for other substances.

When asked if he had taken anything else, Wilson declined to comment. However, John Turner, mitigating, told Durham Crown Court that he was on a methadone programme and had also taken prescription drugs. “His first reaction was that he panicked, but he was concerned ‘about the lad’.”

Turner also said Wilson had written a letter of apology.

Wilson’s prior record includes failing to stop for police and driving while unfit through drink or drugs.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
antigee | 7 years ago
1 like

" i.e. they would lose their job if banned or they have to drive to get to work and they've got kids etc. depending upon them..."

remember a solicitor ringing me (as a line manager) asking me to write a letter for an employee who would be losing his licence for a drink driving offence saying that he would be terminated.

 said I was quite willing to confirm that he would be given other duties and lose his company car as his new duties wouldn't require it and it would be up to the employee to decide how he wanted to proceed from there - also offered to send a copy of his disciplinery record that included a couple of verbal and a written warning regarding at fault accidents  - the solicitor said I wasn't being helpful, I pointed out that the guy simply needed to act with some responsibility and that he had chosen to opt to use public transport unless like me he didn't think his client  was adult enough to make rational decisions

Avatar
1961BikiE | 7 years ago
3 likes

Anyone in this situation should have a lifetime "ban" backed up with instant incarceration every time they are caught driving thereafter. I doubt there's a law/mechanism to do this. But there should be.

Avatar
Paul_C replied to 1961BikiE | 7 years ago
0 likes
1961BikiE wrote:

Anyone in this situation should have a lifetime "ban" backed up with instant incarceration every time they are caught driving thereafter. I doubt there's a law/mechanism to do this. But there should be.

what also annoys me are the numerous motorists still driving 'legally' with more than twelve points on their licences as they've been able to make a hardship plea... i.e. they would lose their job if banned or they have to drive to get to work and they've got kids etc. depending upon them...

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 7 years ago
2 likes

clearly licensing solves the problem of poorly trained road users and should be extended to more groups.

Avatar
RPK | 7 years ago
1 like

"An unlicensed motorist responsible for a hit-and-run collision with a cyclist has been jailed for three years and banned from driving for three years on his release"

 

Surely he should be banned until he gets a licence?

Avatar
brooksby replied to RPK | 7 years ago
1 like

RPK wrote:

Surely he should be banned until he gets a licence?

What difference would it make? They've been happily driving around without a licence to drive or (presumably, therefore) insurance so far; why would being banned make any difference at all? I seriously doubt that they're going to suddenly  say to themselves "Oh yeah, been banned from driving by the courts now so I'd better not take the car...".

Avatar
Gourmet Shot | 7 years ago
3 likes

"An unlicensed motorist responsible for a hit-and-run collision with a cyclist has been jailed for three years and banned from driving for three years on his release"

Lols...banned from driving when he doesnt have a licence anyway....pointless.

 

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
4 likes

I'd love to see the apology letter. 

I think it's about time that it's impossible to sell a car - private sellers included-  without licence being produced. At least if the seller got prosecuted and fined as well then there might be a few less of this sort on the roads. 

Hopefully his current vehicle was taken away and sold off/crushed. 

Avatar
brooksby replied to Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
0 likes

Yorkshire wallet wrote:

I think it's about time that it's impossible to sell a car - private sellers included-  without licence being produced. At least if the seller got prosecuted and fined as well then there might be a few less of this sort on the roads.

A good idea: why would you own a car if you didn't have a licence to drive it or insurance to cover it? And I suppose you could have a special note from the courts if you had your licence withdrawn: "I don't have a driving licence I can show you: the courts took it away because *I was driving like a tw@t *I killed someone with my car (*delete as appropriate)".

Avatar
bobbinogs | 7 years ago
4 likes

Ah right, so the license he never had has been taken away....that should stop him driving.

 

I sometimes wonder if magistrates ever find their jobs to be somewhat ironic?

Latest Comments