Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

BBC claim not wearing a helmet is illegal

CTC invites members to urge BBC for a retraction – you could too

The CTC has picked up on an error in a BBC News report about the clampdown on poor road use in the Capital.

The report includes a reference to fines being issued for, among other things "...not wearing a helmet and using a mobile phone."

Transport for London and the Met Police have confirmed to the CTC that the BBC was wrong to claim that wearing a helmet is a legal requirement.

TfL has said it will be contacting the BBC but the CTC has invited its members to help make sure a retraction is broadcast by sharing their views. There’s no reason why road.cc readers shouldn’t do the same…

Chris Peck from the CTC told road.cc, “Leaving to one side for a moment the debate about whether it makes sense to wear a helmet, there’s still a common misconception that it’s illegal not to. There’s a lot of confusion around this issue and we’re constantly trying to educate people so when opportunities like this arise we try to engage our membership and other engaged cyclists to help spread the word.

“Of course it’s a shame that the retractions and corrections are never quite as prominent as the original mistakes…”

Lifelong lover of most things cycling-related, from Moulton Mini adventures in the 70s to London bike messengering in the 80s, commuting in the 90s, mountain biking in the noughties and road cycling throughout. Editor of Simpson Magazine (www.simpsonmagazine.cc). 

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
Grizzerly replied to neilwheel | 13 years ago
0 likes

'Need a name?
Google 'Jocelyn Lovell'.
And no, he didn't have a fall in his kitchen'

I knew Joce Lovell, he got run down from behind by a truck and broke his neck. No helmet would have prevented his injuries, in fact, a helmet would have probably exacerbated the injuries.

If you actually read the design specifications for cycle helmets, you will find that they are designed to reduce injury in 'single vehicle accidents at speeds below 16kph'. In an accident involving a motor vehicle they are worse than useless.

Avatar
blundershot replied to TheHatter | 13 years ago
0 likes
TheHatter wrote:

Skippy doesn't oz also has the highest obesity rate?... maybe not enough people cycling?... maybe cos they have to wear helmets?

ah the ol' fat Aussies chestnut.. as far as I can find out the OECD stats show -

Aussie adults with a BMI above 30 is 21.7%
UK adults with BMI above 30 is 24%
http://stats.oecd.org/health/

Perhaps TheHatter spends too much time reading the Daily Mail.

Lets have a look at some of the other stats on the OECD site...

Life Expectancy -
Australia is ranked 3rd
UK is ranked 18th
http://stats.oecd.org/health/

How about heart disease?
Australia 110.9 deaths per 100,000 people
UK 122 deaths per 100,000 people
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_hea_dis_dea-health-heart-disease-d...

And before you bring out the nonsense stats from the cyclehelmets.org and their 'selective' use of data and falsified stats to show drops in cycling numbers, lets look at at cycling patterns in Perth WA (as it is touted as an example of how cycling helmet laws caused a drop in cycling).
The Department of Transport data (an edited 'version' of which is used on cyclehelmets.org) on cycling numbers since 1998 shows a 450% INCREASE in the number of cyclists.
http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/cycling/20051.asp

Of course the Department's data collection methods and full stats are available on that site, unlike cyclehelmets.org's 'dead' links and 'edited' excel spreadsheets supposedly from the Department of Transport.

I suggest your cause finds another country from which you can manipulate data in the future...

Avatar
Ciaran Patrick replied to skippy | 13 years ago
0 likes

Yeah right its so hot you can't see where your going. Your head is boiling hot so that really focus and that is in winter. maybe we should give up when it gets to hot or we start to think we can take greater risks because we wear a helmet. The old Volvo syndrome. Helmets can help but they can also hinder. What about the guy that was paralised in a crash where the helmet is given as the cause of the injury. I have a motorbike license and well as a car. if everybody was given proper training and it had to be updated and we were more visible and the roads were made safer for cyclists this would be better. Helmets seem in many peoples thinking to the the only panacea to all cycling injuries. Yes helmets help some people but not all. It is a matter of personal choice. I have never worn a helmet and will most likely never will. I am more aware of the road much more aware than if I wore a helmet. My bike training has helped assess the road, stationary objects and possible dangers around. Its a personal choice.

Avatar
WolfieSmith | 13 years ago
0 likes

Good comments from many. However, I hope we don't drift into vitriol like so many forums. The web maybe seem like a no risk insult opportunity but it's there forever.

As for helmets? I'm pro choice and for maintaining the current rules. Personally I'd rather hit railings at 40mph with a little polystyrene between my bonce and metal - but if others don't care viv la freedom! Conversely I would have to stop wearing one if Parliament tried to enforce it.

Have a good weekend out there and nice to know that Road.CC is appreciated in Oz. To risk sounding patronising to poor Skippy - You do sound a little accident probe so take care.

Avatar
mandelstam | 13 years ago
0 likes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-AbPav5E5M

Look at all these helmets.....

This is irony.

Pages

Latest Comments