Home
Family of Mark Dunk, who was killed in a lorry collision in 2010, say they can't come to terms with the Police investigation, which failed to fully investigate the crash...

The family of a cyclist who was killed in collision with a lorry have written to Kent Police demanding to see the driver’s blood tests.

Mark Dunk was 28 in February 2010 when the fatal collision took place, as he cycled to work in Thanet, Kent. His family say they “can’t come terms with” the investigation into his death after police admitted failing to fully investigate the death following a case review.

The CTC says the family's response is understandable, given the circumstances, and the case demonstrates why families should be kept informed during police investigations. 

Call for more police funding as report highlights flaws in investigation of Kent cyclist's death

Mr Dunk’s mother, Christine Elson, wrote a letter to chief constable, Alan Pughsley, and made a complaint to the police watchdog.

She writes: “"We want to know what was in [the lorry driver's] system. It should have been divulged to us and the public at large at the inquest.

"I've really come to terms with losing my son, but I can't come to terms with the investigation into his death.

"All I want out of this is justice for my son and the truth because he's not here to defend himself."

Although the initial police investigation concluded Mr Dunk cycled into the path of the lorry, recording a verdict of accidental death, the family disputed this. Following a campaign by the family Kent Police carried out a serious case review, with Essex Police, and found there were “missed opportunities”, which included a failure to examine the driver’s “consumption of codeine and its effects on him”.

Mrs Elson says she has lodged a new complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). 

Legal driving limits for drugs such as codeine were only introduced last year. Prior to that police officers had to assess whether a driver was capable of driving without set guidelines being in place.

CTC the national cycling charity's Road Safety and Legal Campaigns Officer, Duncan Dollimore, told road.cc: "This case demonstrates the difficulties that can arise when the families of victims are not kept fully informed about the progress of police investigations.

"It may well be that the driver’s blood test results show nothing of any relevance, but when, as the police have already admitted in this case, there have been other failings in the investigation, it is understandable that Mark Dunk’s family will wonder whether anything else was missed. If more information had been provided to them at the time perhaps they would not be having to ask these questions five years after their son’s tragic death."

 

2 comments

Avatar
fatbeggaronabike [849 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Hmmmmm.....
Although the initial police investigation concluded Mr Dunk cycled into the path of the lorry, recording a verdict of accidental death.

How did they arrive at this conclusion ah yes they asked the (poss) impaired driver,  then dusted their hands off as they walked away 

Avatar
Stumps [3465 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

It's the coroner who records the accidental death verdict.

Whilst its obvious more could have been done at the time the eventual outcome would have been the same. I believe even the independant analyst the family hired agreed this was the case.

Without knowing the full case its in no one's interest to start the blame game. For all we know the 2 witnesses not interviewed could have been standing with one of the witnesses interviewed and confirmed their account, the simple answer is we dont know.

Had it been my child that died, i too, would want answers so you cant blame them for pushing this further. Its a very sad case and i hope they get the answers they deserve.