Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Oleg Tinkov’s vision for the future of cycling

Wants to see teams less reliant on sponsors for revenue

Top races should be shorter and more viewer-friendly, and there should be fewer of them – that is the opinion of Tinkoff-Saxo owner, Oleg Tinkov, who describes cycling’s current business model as ‘neither viable nor durable’.

Writing on the Tinkoff-Saxo website, Tinkov begins: “World cycling has to change… or die, or maybe just lurch from scandal to scandal for another decade as we watch teams come and go.”

Tinkov is critical of the model which sees pro teams almost wholly dependent on sponsorship for their revenue, arguing that the current system is what is responsible for doping and “the whole ‘grey tinge’ of this wonderful sport”.

Making professional cycling less reliant on sponsorship through exploring new revenue streams is one of the main aims of Velon, the joint venture involving 11 UCI WorldTour teams, including Tinkoff-Saxo. Last year, Velon’s CEO, Graham Bartlett, told us he believed that broadcasters, sponsors and new fans ‘would all be excited about a more joined up sport’ and Tinkov is clearly of a similar mind.

“We need to cut the number of races, reduce their duration and make them more viewer-friendly,” he writes, and while he says that “no-one is interested in these provincial races that get no TV coverage,” he concedes that they do have a place in the sport for teams below World Tour level. For the top teams, he proposes more circuit races around cities and as one example floats the idea of a GP Monaco on the Saturday before the motor racing, making use of the same facilities.

“But it is important that the best sprinters come for this kind of event – the best climbers should go to all the grand tours. That is why I proposed the ‘Three Grand Tour Challenge’, which provoked such a heated discussion – which made me very happy! If you want to have a real show, you need to have the very best competing against the very best.”

Tinkov also has plenty to say about the way teams are managed – including his own.

“The times of Sainz, Bruyneel and Riis are over – they were stuck in the 2000s and that is not necessarily about doping. They just don’t get some obvious things and don’t know how to manage teams in modern way. Managing a team is not just about issuing instructions from a car radio or about casting a spell over the riders at which Riis was unsurpassed, for example. Managing a team is about boring, monotonous work in the office.”

This then leads him to pay his team director what is presumably intended as a compliment. “The day of the boring and meticulous managers has come – guys like Dave Brailsford and, I hope, our new director Stefano Feltrin.”

Tinkov claims he is not considering the ‘torrent of offers’ he has received to replace the recently-sacked Bjarne Riis, arguing that the team already has all the expertise it needs. However, this didn’t prevent him from publishing a typically mischievous April Fool’s Day tweet in which he suggested that Lance Armstrong had been hired as general manager.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
Nixster | 9 years ago
0 likes

He makes some good points but has some vast blind spots in his views. Why trading flighty sponsors for capricious billionaire owners is a step forward is a point lost on me, for example. And if Riis is so obviously a relic of the past, who gave him a job then?

Where there is agreement is that a more sustainable business model is needed and at the moment TV rights seem to be the front runner for a better revenue stream. Look however at what that's done for football and tell me with a straight face that model will benefit any one outside the World Tour?

There is a problem but it seems very unlikely to me that Oleg is part of the solution.

Avatar
wingsofspeed68 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Too much money in any sport ends up being the route of all evil.
If (Bond villain) Mr Tinkoff wants to stop shelling out as a sponsor, then may I suggest he does just that and stop interfering with the model of cycling we all seem to enjoy - IT"S NOT YOURS IT'S OURS now GO AWAY!!!

Just look at last weeks calendar as a shining example of the sport.

Avatar
darrenleroy | 9 years ago
0 likes

So he wants to iron out the quirks of the race calendar; the smaller races that have been around for aeons, in order to make the sport more attractive. More uniform and therefore dull, more like.

Avatar
Stumps | 9 years ago
0 likes

Whewn, as an owner, you have a never ending supply of cash - like Tinkov you can come out and say these things but what about the smaller teams that rely on sponsorship to keep their team afloat and ultimatley allow riders to take part in the biggest and best races.

These smaller teams are where a lot of the future big names learn their trade and without them where do they go ?

They will go the same route as cycling would and thats nowhere and ultimately they will be lost from the sport.

Avatar
DrJDog | 9 years ago
0 likes

I'd like to see a sprinter keep up around the Monaco GP circuit

Avatar
MattCartwright | 9 years ago
0 likes

You know, like him or not, he does make some sense. The sponsorship model offers no security for the sport, the teams or the riders. Going to need some more races though as how else will they generate revenue? I can't see the Tour/Giro people too keen to share.

Avatar
carytb | 9 years ago
0 likes

This in a way was what they did with the world Rally championship. Made it viewer friendly, cut down the length of rallies and in effect took away the individual nature of each one. Eventually killed it and it is now a shadow of what it once once,

Latest Comments