£25 million funding to pay for 30 improved routes and lots of updating

Cyclists in Scotland will be able to enjoy a radical extension of the country’s walking and cycle routes thanks to a £25 million cash injection that will create 500 miles of new routes over the next five years.

It’s all part of ambitious plans by Scottish Natural Heritage, Sustrans and Scottish Canals to get Scotland more active, and will see 30 new long distance routes created and numerous others updated and resurfaced.

The Dundee Green Circular, along with routes including Crook of Devon and Kinross, Lochearnhead to Crieff and a new Fife Pilgrim Way from Culross and North Queensferry to St Andrews will be among the first to be looked at.

Others include a Great Trossachs Path — between Callander and Inversnaid — a Hebridean Way on Harris and Lewis and the full-length "Pilgrim's Way" across Scotland between St Andrews and Iona.

All the cycle ways will conform to high European-style standards, and will be funded by a mix of public and private partnership.

Planning Secretary Alex Neil told The Courier: "Scotland's extensive network of long-distance routes, national cycleways and canal towpaths is already much loved and well used.

"Encouraging more people to enjoy the natural environment is important for the environment, tourism and boosting the economy — that's why the National Long Distance Cycling and Walking Network is designated as a national development in Scotland's National Planning Framework.

"The plan will extend the network of connected, accessible paths and tracks for visitors of all ages and abilities to walk and cycle, encouraging even more people and visitors to enjoy the outdoors and to become more active."

Ian Ross, chairman of Scottish Natural Heritage, added: "We want to make sure that the network offers something for everyone, with rural routes offering peace and quiet, great views and the chance to get close to nature; paths between settlements to help local people commute away from traffic; high-spec surfaces in places for people in wheelchairs and cyclists, and more varied paths for walkers, mountain bikers and horse riders.

"The most important thing is to give people the chance to access and enjoy the outdoors close to where they live — irrespective of their age or mobility.

"On the back of that, we hope that people will embrace healthier, more active and sustainable lifestyles."

Earlier this month we reported how a new report from Cycling Scotland shows a 32 per cent increase in cycling in Scotland between 2003 and 2013.

However, with it still only representing 0.75 per cent of total traffic volume, there is a strong belief that much more needs to be done.

The report covers a range of topics, including estimated levels of cycling, cycle commuting, cycling to school and road safety.

The proportion of those cycling to work at least ‘regularly’ is now 5.6 per cent for Scotland as a whole with the highest levels seen in Edinburgh (12.2%), Moray (10.3%) and Argyll & Bute (9.1%).

In 2013, five per cent of children indicated that they normally cycle to primary school with levels highest in Highland (10.7%), East Lothian (9.5%) and Stirling (9.2%). However, just 0.9 per cent of children cycle to secondary school nationwide.

Cycling as a main mode of travel in Scotland was estimated at just one per cent in 2013, while the volume of cycling traffic was 329 million vehicle kilometres travelled, a 32 per cent increase on 2003’s 249 million kilometres.

This represented growth from 0.59 per cent to 0.75 per cent.

Late last year Scottish Transport Minister Keith Brown unveiled A Long Term Vision for Active Travel in Scotland 2030 with its aim of encouraging more people to walk and cycle for everyday shorter journeys has been welcomed, critics are questioning whether enough is being done to achieve that.

Brown explained: “This vision sets out how we hope Scotland will look in 2030 if more people are walking and cycling for short, everyday journeys allowing us to reap the benefits of active travel.

“It goes without saying that cycling and walking benefits the individual by improving their physical health, but also their mental health, and keeps their transport costs down whilst also benefiting the environment by reducing greenhouse gases and pollutants.”

The document depicts a future Scotland in which people are walking or cycling for the majority of shorter journeys.

Main roads into town centres all have either segregated cycling provision or high quality direct, safe and pleasant alternatives; pedestrian and cycle paths are in place; and rural and suburban minor roads have low speed limits.

Transport is integrated and there is a culture of active travel.

However, critics have questioned whether enough is being done to make these dreams a reality. Speaking to The Scotsman, Colin Howden, Director of Sustainable transport lobby group Transform Scotland, said:

“A long-term vision for walking and cycling is all very well but what we actually need is action now, not at some vague time off into the future.

“What we do know is the Scottish Government’s investment in active travel falls in this year’s budget despite the overall transport budget again rising. Some short-term action to tackle that situation would be more helpful than platitudes about long-term priorities.”

We’ve also reported on how campaigners have told Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) that there is “no way” that a target of 10 per cent of journeys in the country being made by bicycle by 2020 will be achieved while spending remains at its current levels. They have also called for more transparency over the country's active travel budget.

That 10 per cent target was reiterated in last year’s updated Cycle Action Plan for Scotland (CAPS).

MSPs sitting on Holyrood’s transport committee warned the Scottish Government more than four years ago that without adequate funding, the target was unachievable.

Now, an inquiry into the Scottish Government’s budget by the infrastructure and capital investment committee has been told by campaigners Pedal on Parliament, who want 10 per cent of the country’s £2 billion transport budget dedicated to cycling,  that the target is beyond reach at current levels of spend.

After an unpromising start, having to be bribed by her parents to learn to ride without stabilisers, Sarah became rather keener on cycling in her university years, and was eventually persuaded to upgrade to proper road cycling by the prospect of a shiny red Italian bike, which she promptly destroyed by trapping a pair of knickers in the rear derailleur. Sarah writes about about cycling every weekend on road.cc.


bikebot [2118 posts] 2 years ago

500 miles for £25m is £50,000 per mile. Is that buying tarmac or mud?

JamesJ [37 posts] 2 years ago

I suspect it is mostly for buying signposts to re-designate existing routes as cycle routes.

Kim [250 posts] 2 years ago

The report from Cycling Scotland showing an increase in cycling in Scotland between 2003 and 2013, should be put into context. Cycle modal share in Scotland has increased from 1.5% to 1.7% over ten years in which Cycling Scotland has existed. Most of that increase has been in Edinburgh, and is due to the tram works making so difficult to drive across the city, people started to mode switch and cycle or walk instead.

It is also notable that Edinburgh is the only place in Scotland where car use and car ownership have declined over the last ten years. Proof positive that people are not wedded to their cars. When you do create the conditions where it is easier to cycle and walk, people will change their main mode of transport.

We need change, support the campaign to make Scotland a cycle friendly nation, join us at Pedal on Parliament 25th April 2015.

Tin Pony [73 posts] 2 years ago

It's easy to criticise anything but at least the intent is there to make improved infastructure and safety tha should I turn improve participation which will feed into the political pressure to do more. It's a start at least

a_to_the_j [118 posts] 2 years ago

the intent is there...to placate the cycling community! this spending, this pittance amount of money is just TOURIST routes to get TOURIST money in.
does nothing for day to day commuter cyclists - making that SAFE and EASY and DIRECT should be the priority...
no new cycle parking spaces near major bus routes or train routes, no new designated cycle paths to keep us of busy A roads, NOTHING like that.

kcr [153 posts] 2 years ago

Yes, tourist paths, so not doing anything about where we really need improvement; day to day urban cycling infrastructure.
Lots of positive chat from the Scottish Government, but I don't see concrete evidence of really getting serious about improving cycling infrastructure.
The new Forth crossing, one of the highest profile transport engineering projects in the country at the moment, has no cycling access. Cyclists will have access to the old bridge, but unlike the new crossing, this is not designed for bad weather use, and in the 21st Century, how can you even consider not building cycle access into a new transport project?

oldstrath [953 posts] 2 years ago
Tin Pony wrote:

It's easy to criticise anything but at least the intent is there to make improved infastructure and safety tha should I turn improve participation which will feed into the political pressure to do more. It's a start at least

No it's not. There is no intent to make direct, useful, commuter cycling easier or safer. There is an intent to persuade people to do a small amount of weekend leisure cycling.. It will do nothing useful about emissions, and very little for population fitness. Its main achievement will be to teach kids that cycling is something done in special places, at weekends, rather than a serious form of transport.

ron611087 [358 posts] 2 years ago

Scotland is one of my favourite places for cycling because of the low traffic volumes on rural roads, but then my cycling there has been mainly recreational, which is quite different from the needs of a commuter. I hope this investment is meaningful for Scotlands commuters.

ragweasel [14 posts] 2 years ago

Extra money sounds good to me, even if it is on 'tourist routes'.

You have to start somewhere, and anything that gets people riding their bike (and enjoying it) is a good thing surely?

Scotland is an amazing country for bike touring so I'm sure I'll be heading up to take advantage of some of this development in the future.