Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Tipper truck involved in another London cyclist fatality

Male rider dies after collision involving HGV on Homerton High Street this afternoon

A male cyclist has died in London this afternon following a collision with a tipper truck. The incident took place at around 4.20pm in Homerton High Street.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman confirmed to road.cc that officers had attended the incident alongside members of the London Ambulance Service, with the victim pronounced dead at the scene.

The driver of the lorry stopped at the scene and is assisting officers with their investigation.

Twitter user @namelesswon posted a picture of the scene to the social network; the other death mentioned in the tweet was related to a stabbing incident and did not involve a cyclist.

 

 

Lorries of any description make up just 4 per cent of London's traffic, but account for around half of cyclist deaths in the city.

Among those fatalities, tipper trucks are by far the most common type of lorry involved; the same type of vehicle was involved in the death last month of physiotherapist Stephanie Turner.

The 29-year-old was killed at the junction of Amhurst Road and Seven Sisters Road, just a couple of miles from the scene of today's fatality.

Hundreds of cyclists attended a vigil in her memory last week.

 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

54 comments

Avatar
Andrewbanshee | 9 years ago
0 likes

I think I will wear blinkers and fire a gun in random directions. Not my fault if I hit someone. Right?

We know the inherent issues with blind spots. We know the lack of public awareness of the safety issues of cycling in traffic, how cycle lanes guide the unwary trusting cyclist down the left hand side of vehicles at traffic lights. Remember these are not cyclists who look up safety issues etc. They assume that the road structure, if it has cycle lanes on it, is there to keep them safe. And why shouldn't they assume this?

Not a worthwhile exercise arguing who is at fault, but it is worthwhile arguing how to prevent it from happening again. And again. And again.

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove | 9 years ago
0 likes

Being reported elsewhere that the cyclist was an experienced commuter, an active member of London Dynamo Cycle Club and raced at Hillingdon on Saturday:
http://www.hackneyhive.co.uk/index/2015/02/dalston-man-named-cyclist-kil...

Practically the complete opposite of a noob that would be oblivious about going up the inside of a HGV.

Frankly, if it could happen to him, it could happen to anyone.

Avatar
leftback | 9 years ago
0 likes

Tragic. Just yesterday at the top of Borough High Street, I deliberately stayed back on my cycle in the northbound left hand lane to see whether the tipper truck to my right would come over into the left hand lane, as I expected he would, to head over London Bridge. Sure enough he pulls over without even bothering to indicate. I am pretty sure if I had carried on in my lane he would not have seen me. About three months back I witnessed hoards of cyclists surrounding a stationary tipper truck trying to edge forward in the traffic in the middle lane on the north side of London Bridge. He realized he couldn’t see properly and sounded his horn to warn cyclists to keep clear, which seemed like the right thing to do. Many cyclists do not seem to realize the danger from these vehicles with their limited visibility. It’s not only left turns that kill. Getting dragged under the wheels when next to the truck also causes deaths. In the short term I think the government does not do nearly enough to educate cyclists to keep out of danger situations for example not sitting in the gutter in stationary traffic. Also to react to danger situations if you find yourself in one through no fault of your own. These trucks and their human drivers have to be regarded at all times as unpredictable killers and treated accordingly. As for changing truck driver behaviour how to do that? Maybe mandatory cameras in the cab pointing at the road and the truck driver should be mandatory would help. In the longer term these vehicles should be re-designed like many refuse lorries have, with the cab much lower. That would reduce pedestrian deaths too. Once again what a tragic waste of a life.

Avatar
dee4life2005 | 9 years ago
0 likes

All lorries, as far as I'm aware, have an audible siren that activates when reversing. Having them fitted to activate with the left indicator as well would also alert anyone caught up the inside of a turning vehicle that they are in harms way. Granted, this could me annoying most of the time, but if it helps prevent these sad stories cropping every week then surely it's worth it. That's assuming the vehicle bothers indicating of course, which seems to be "optional" around where I live.

Tipper trucks also seem to be the major culprit, so surely something should be done urgently to address this situation. I'm saddened that nothing seems to be happening in this regard. Boris Johnson, get the finger oot ffs!!!

Avatar
ct | 9 years ago
0 likes

How fucking tragic.

RIP

Avatar
oozaveared | 9 years ago
0 likes

There is an issue with Tipper Trucks. I've never driven one so I don't know what that is. As a former professional driver I always default to driver error. If your vehicle has blind spots you should know what they are and take them into account.

For my part the Tipper Truck phenomena has been such a constant feature that I do everything I can not to go anywhere near them. I'm certainly not going up the inside of one.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to oozaveared | 9 years ago
0 likes
oozaveared wrote:

There is an issue with Tipper Trucks. I've never driven one so I don't know what that is. As a former professional driver I always default to driver error. If your vehicle has blind spots you should know what they are and take them into account.

For my part the Tipper Truck phenomena has been such a constant feature that I do everything I can not to go anywhere near them. I'm certainly not going up the inside of one.

I've driven a tipper truck (not on-road as I don't have an HGV licence) and I'm highly aware of the poor visibility from the cab. It is all too easy to make a mistake. Sadly, this can result in death and serious injury.

We still don't know exactly what did happen in this incident.

Avatar
jacknorell replied to OldRidgeback | 9 years ago
0 likes
OldRidgeback wrote:

I've driven a tipper truck (not on-road as I don't have an HGV licence) and I'm highly aware of the poor visibility from the cab. It is all too easy to make a mistake. Sadly, this can result in death and serious injury.

We still don't know exactly what did happen in this incident.

How can it ever be called a mistake to drive a vehicle into a space which isn't viewable, on purpose?

If you can't see, you don't move it, simple.

Any other interpretation of the law of liability or the HC means we've accepted that road fatalities are inevitable and will happen. No big deal... just expect it, get out of the way, because might makes right.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to jacknorell | 9 years ago
0 likes
jacknorell wrote:
OldRidgeback wrote:

I've driven a tipper truck (not on-road as I don't have an HGV licence) and I'm highly aware of the poor visibility from the cab. It is all too easy to make a mistake. Sadly, this can result in death and serious injury.

We still don't know exactly what did happen in this incident.

How can it ever be called a mistake to drive a vehicle into a space which isn't viewable, on purpose?

If you can't see, you don't move it, simple.

Any other interpretation of the law of liability or the HC means we've accepted that road fatalities are inevitable and will happen. No big deal... just expect it, get out of the way, because might makes right.

No, you've misinterpreted what I said. You've also suggested the tipper truck driver did this on purpose, which we don't know and which the police seem to think was not the case, otherwise the driver would have been arrested on the spot. Yes, tipper trucks do present a hazard and there are safety issues involved in their use but that doesn't mean you can throw out accusations at people without knowing all the facts, unless you really want to risk a libel case.

Avatar
jacknorell replied to OldRidgeback | 9 years ago
0 likes
OldRidgeback wrote:
jacknorell wrote:
OldRidgeback wrote:

... I'm highly aware of the poor visibility from the cab. It is all too easy to make a mistake. Sadly, this can result in death and serious injury.

We still don't know exactly what did happen in this incident.

How can it ever be called a mistake to drive a vehicle into a space which isn't viewable, on purpose?

If you can't see, you don't move it, simple. ...

No, you've misinterpreted what I said. You've also suggested the tipper truck driver did this on purpose, which we don't know and which the police seem to think was not the case, otherwise the driver would have been arrested on the spot. Yes, tipper trucks do present a hazard and there are safety issues involved in their use but that doesn't mean you can throw out accusations at people without knowing all the facts, unless you really want to risk a libel case.

Not just directed at you, but anyone looking at it in the view that it's hard to see out of the cab, so... it's ok to move without seeing.

Yes, if the driver moves his vehicle into a space where he can't see it to be clear, it's intentional. Else, the driver isn't in control, which is dangerous driving by default rather than the careless driving the intentional move is.

Yes, he purposefully drove the vehicle without knowing the space his vehicle was to occupy was clear of other roadusers.

Why is this so hard for so many to understand?

Rule 126: Drive at a speed where you can stop within distance that can be seen to be clear (translation: If you can't see, stop the f-ing vehicle)

Rule 159:

Before moving off you should:

- use all mirrors to check the road is clear
- look round to check the blind spots (the areas you are unable to see in the mirrors)
- signal if necessary before moving out
- look round for a final check.

Move off only when it is safe to do so.

What's so difficult about this?

Avatar
teaboy | 9 years ago
0 likes

Ah, Hackney - the "share the road - it's safer" borough. Thanks again...

Avatar
trevorparsons replied to teaboy | 9 years ago
0 likes
teaboy wrote:

Ah, Hackney - the "share the road - it's safer" borough. Thanks again...

Homerton High Street is less than nine metres wide where Akis was killed, and narrows to seven metres in places.

If teaboy has a proposal for how to provide high quality protected space on this rather narrow street, and at this minor junction in particular, he should put it forward.

Avatar
bikebot | 9 years ago
0 likes

Deleted

For some reason the Evening Standard reported earlier that the driver had been arrested, before removing the revised story. Apologies for relaying what appears to have been a false report.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

You don't know that road.

What a ridiculously presumptuous thing to say.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
don simon wrote:
Quote:

You don't know that road.

What a ridiculously presumptuous thing to say.

Anymore ridiculous than talking about Madrid lorry drivers? Me' thinks not.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes
Colin Peyresourde wrote:
don simon wrote:
Quote:

You don't know that road.

What a ridiculously presumptuous thing to say.

Anymore ridiculous than talking about Madrid lorry drivers? Me' thinks not.

If you think that an illustration of driver awareness in a heavily congested city as an example of how people live together and how this particular truck driver should have been aware of cyclists is more ridiculous than assuming you know which roads I do or don't know and the resulting right to comment, then that's up to you.  1

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes

You don't know that road. Cyclists regular come up on vehicles from the left and so drop into a massive blind spot. The driver will likely have been focusing on the car in front and the traffic in front of that. Undertaking is never recommended but this is how the road set-up dictates things. Strictly speaking the cyclist should take the lane and sit behind the truck - never undertake a tipper.

It's not surprising that a tipper truck was involved as they have huge off-side blind spots. The driver will not have known that the cyclist was there and may have done nothing wrong.

The filtering of cyclists happens well before any junction or traffic light.

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove replied to Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes
Colin Peyresourde wrote:

You don't know ... The driver will likely have been focusing on the car in front and the traffic in front of that. ... The driver will not have known that the cyclist was there and may have done nothing wrong.

Please heed your own advice & keep your victim blaming opinions to yourself.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to tarquin_foxglove | 9 years ago
0 likes
tarquin_foxglove wrote:
Colin Peyresourde wrote:

You don't know ... The driver will likely have been focusing on the car in front and the traffic in front of that. ... The driver will not have known that the cyclist was there and may have done nothing wrong.

Please heed your own advice & keep your victim blaming opinions to yourself.

Well I have seen a lot of cyclists do this and it is dangerous to do so here. I'm explaining that it is about the road structure forcing cyclists into a behaviour they have learned. And explaining that the lorry driver may have been obeying the rules of the road too. People are pretty quick to jump on lorry driver (as evidenced above). You haven't told them to be quiet so I won't be anytime soon.

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove replied to Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes
Colin Peyresourde wrote:

Well I have seen a lot of cyclists do this and it is dangerous to do so here. I'm explaining that it is about the road structure forcing cyclists into a behaviour they have learned.

Which may or may not have any relevance to this incident. You weren't there, you don't know, speculation doesn't help anyone.

Colin Peyresourde wrote:

And explaining that the lorry driver may have been obeying the rules of the road too.

You weren't there, you don't know, speculation doesn't help anyone.

Colin Peyresourde wrote:

People are pretty quick to jump on lorry driver (as evidenced above). You haven't told them to be quiet so I won't be anytime soon.

It is understandable that people will empathise with the dead cyclist & blame the driver of the vehicle that killed them but of the 20 odd comments prior to your comment blaming the victim & imaging what the driver was thinking about, 1 person mentioned the driver & said that their attitude would be a contributing factor.

Avatar
sargey2003 replied to Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes

The driver has a responsibility to be aware of the fact that a cyclist may be there. If he was not aware then he has done something wrong.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to sargey2003 | 9 years ago
0 likes
sargey2003 wrote:

The driver has a responsibility to be aware of the fact that a cyclist may be there. If he was not aware then he has done something wrong.

I would agree with you if the lorry is turning and moving into space. But if it just moving forward then you cannot hope for it to be aware 100% of the time of what happens behind or beside it.

Avatar
ConcordeCX replied to Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes
Colin Peyresourde wrote:

It's not surprising that a tipper truck was involved as they have huge off-side blind spots. The driver will not have known that the cyclist was there and may have done nothing wrong.

That tells us that these things are inherently unsafe and shouldn't be on the road

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to ConcordeCX | 9 years ago
0 likes
ConcordeCX wrote:
Colin Peyresourde wrote:

It's not surprising that a tipper truck was involved as they have huge off-side blind spots. The driver will not have known that the cyclist was there and may have done nothing wrong.

That tells us that these things are inherently unsafe and shouldn't be on the road

Careful about the logic. People talk about cyclists in the same way....

Avatar
userfriendly replied to Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes
Colin Peyresourde wrote:
ConcordeCX wrote:
Colin Peyresourde wrote:

It's not surprising that a tipper truck was involved as they have huge off-side blind spots. The driver will not have known that the cyclist was there and may have done nothing wrong.

That tells us that these things are inherently unsafe and shouldn't be on the road

Careful about the logic. People talk about cyclists in the same way....

Only daft people. We probably shouldn't be listening to daft people.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

The road infrastructure will have a massive part to play in this.

Driver attitude will have a massive part to play in this.
I lived and drove, cycled and motorcycled in Madrid and not once had issue with drivers. That is except for one bus driver who was looking for trouble and deliberately drove at me while cycling.
As a driver you have to expect the motorbikes and scooters filter through to the front a traffic lights. Even if none filter through, you expect it and therefore look for it. There is a far heightened awareness of other road users. The only accidents I saw were where the scooterist had gambled and lost.
There are lots of cyclists in that there London village and the driver's default should be that there is a cyclist coming from behind.
We must learn to share the roads.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes

I know this road and from the picture exactly where this is. It's quite a narrow stretch and there is some road furniture which puts the cyclists in direct conflict with the traffic.

Usually the traffic is slow just before Chatsworth Road, often cyclists coming up from the junction get the hop on the traffic because of queues. The tendency is for them to under cut the traffic. As the approach the traffic island the inside route is normally barred because the cars/buses/trucks take away the space. I would not recommend doing this, and that cyclists overtake the slow moving traffic here.

I have seen many less wary about doing so.

The road infrastructure will have a massive part to play in this.

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes

RIP,

I regularly have a number of tipper trucks pass me on the way to work, and i have never had an issue the drivers give me plenty of room. However this is in a rural setting plenty of time good sight lines etc. now take one of these trucks and place it into a urban setting, far more to see, far more going on, driver distracted by sat nav trying to find delivery address, cars and cyclists cutting in and out, then through in to the mix the trucks own issues with blind spots and you really do have a disaster waiting to happen.

In the right place these trucks are perfectly safe, an urban setting isn't the right place without major work.

I seem to remember that a large quantity of materials for the olympics were brought in on barges to keep trucks off the road. This won't work for everything but it is things like this that should be addressed on all developments.

Avatar
hoopyfrood replied to mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes
mrmo wrote:

I seem to remember that a large quantity of materials for the olympics were brought in on barges to keep trucks off the road.

I'm afraid that was greenwash. Barges were hardly used at all. It was a scam to barrage the tidal river Lea so that there'd be no low-tide mud by the riverside housing they wanted to sell. You used to see the tides at Hackney marsh - not any more.
http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/771
http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/401

Avatar
mrmo replied to hoopyfrood | 9 years ago
0 likes
hoopyfrood wrote:
mrmo wrote:

I seem to remember that a large quantity of materials for the olympics were brought in on barges to keep trucks off the road.

I'm afraid that was greenwash. Barges were hardly used at all. It was a scam to barrage the tidal river Lea so that there'd be no low-tide mud by the riverside housing they wanted to sell. You used to see the tides at Hackney marsh - not any more.
http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/771
http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/401

Might have been greenwash, but it does point out that if they could be arsed there are things that could be done, infact it does actually make an important point, if they could be arsed to spend the money they could get trucks off the road. How much is a life worth?

Pages

Latest Comments