Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

"No way" Scotland will hit 10 per cent cycling target at current level of spend, campaigners warn

Scottish Government urged to increase investment in cycling and make its budget more transparent

Campaigners have told Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) that there is “no way” that a target of 10 per cent of journeys in the country being made by bicycle by 2020 will be achieved while spending remains at its current levels. They have also called for more transparency over the country's active travel budget.

That 10 oer cent target was reiterated in last year’s updated Cycle Action Plan for Scotland (CAPS). However, as we reported last month, in the recently published document, A Long Term Vision for Active Travel in Scotland 2030, transport minister Keith Brown speaks more of a “vision” than a “target.”

MSPs sitting on Holyrood’s transport committee warned the Scottish Government more than four years ago that without adequate funding, the target was unachievable.

But according to Sustrans Scotland, the share of trips made by bicycle was just 1 per cent in 2013, reports Local Transport Today.

Now, an inquiry into the Scottish Government’s budget by the infrastructure and capital investment committee has been told by campaigners Pedal on Parliament, who want 10 per cent of the country’s £2 billion transport budget dedicated to cycling,  that the target is beyond reach at current levels of spend.

In its submission to the committee, Pedal on Parliament said: “There is certainly no way that the current rate of progress, nor that the current Cycling Action Plan for Scotland approach will achieve anything like the growth required.”

Lothian cycling campaign group Spokes warned that the Scottish Government’s spend on active travel was set to fall from £40.3 million in 2014/15 to £37 million next year, a decline of 8 per cent, and that within that, expenditure on infrastructure would slide by 22 per cent from £36 million to £28 million.

That represents a little more than 1 per cent of the country’s transport budget of around £2 billion, and just a tenth of the level of investment Pedal and Parliament says is needed for the target to be reached.

Spokes also criticised the Scottish Government over what it says is a lack of transparency in planned investment in active travel, saying: “The most absurd example is that the ‘sustainable & active travel’ and the ‘future transport fund’ budget lines both cover very similar and overlapping expenditure types.

“Both include spending on active travel infrastructure, encouraging modal shift and other ‘green transport’ initiatives, yet the amounts going to these purposes from both budget lines are obscure.

“Since active travel expenditure probably accounts for (very roughly) 50% of the combined total of these two lines, far greater transparency would be achieved by replacing those two budget lines by one for active travel and another for other future/green transport,” it added.

Sustrans Scotland likewisehit out at what it said was an absence of clarity in the budget. It said: “The draft budget does not contain a clear line about funding for active travel despite repeated calls for this to be the case.

“At present, it is well-nigh impossible to accurately ascertain how much money will be directed towards active travel as the figure is so buried away within other funding pots.

“Active travel funding in 2014/15 and the proposed funding for 2015/16 is noticeably higher than in previous years,” it went on.

“However, we had hoped that 2014/15 marked the start of an ongoing rise and drive to reach the CAPS vision for 10 per cent of trips to be by bike by 2020. It now looks like 2014/15 was a peak or, at best, the start of a plateau in investment.”

Addressing the infrastructure and capital investment committee last month, transport minister Mr Brown said: “The target is a shared aspiration. Achieving it is not just down to the government, but is between the local authorities and all the agencies.”

City of Edinburgh City Council is one local authority that has increased spend on cycling, and urged the Scottish Government to do likewise.

It said: “This council, in support of its ambitious targets for active travel, has set aside a percentage of its overall transport budget for investment in and promotion of cycling. The percentage stands at 7 per cent in the current financial year.

“It’s worth noting that Scotland’s cities, Edinburgh in particular, have recently been making some significant progress in the share of journeys made by active travel and especially cycling,” it added.

Mr Brown accepted that to date, increased levels of cycling had not materialised, but insisted: “It is true to say that what we expected to happen has happened, in that the early investment in behavioural change needs time to work through.

He added: “We are still aiming for the 10 per cent by 2020, but the early work is hard work. We want to see real progress towards that shared ambition soon.”

With more than five years having elapsed since that 10 per cent target was first set, however, and just five more to go until the deadline of 2020 the Scottish Government set itself, many must fear it is already impossible to achieve.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
Tin Pony | 9 years ago
0 likes

Infrastructure is all well and good but even basic relatively cheap interventions can make a big difference in participation. Perhaps putting prominently positioned secure bike parking in town centres or painting cycle routes more clearly. These have been proven to increase cycling and cyclists numbers. Ofcourse a windproof waterproof bike may help too lol
www.tinpony.co.uk

Avatar
Dug Hickin | 9 years ago
0 likes

Nice picture of the Scottish Parliament Bike Stands....no bikes though, missed a trick there methinks!  7

Avatar
mrmo replied to Dug Hickin | 9 years ago
0 likes
Dug Hickin wrote:

Nice picture of the Scottish Parliament Bike Stands....no bikes though, missed a trick there methinks!  7

That's the point, you don't want bikes littering the place blocking access etc. you just want a nicely designed piece of street furniture that you can point at and say, "see we even thought about cyclists."

Avatar
Paul_C | 9 years ago
0 likes

If you want 10% of journeys to be made by bicycle, then you have to spend at least 10% of your transport budget on proper cycling infrastructure and start to make choosing a motorised vehicle for short trips less favourable... training and "share the road" initiatives will not work... we've had that cr@p for the past 40 or more years...

make motons take the long way round for short trips, not cyclists as you currently do...

Avatar
truffy replied to Paul_C | 9 years ago
0 likes
Paul_C wrote:

If you want 10% of journeys to be made by bicycle, then you have to spend at least 10% of your transport budget on proper cycling infrastructure

Is that figure derived from people who know what they're talking about, or did you just make it up?

Avatar
Sniffer | 9 years ago
0 likes

When government miss targets I suppose the effect could be they are not re-elected.

While I am not niave enough to believe that there is a huge percentage of the population who will vote on this basis, but it is the ultimate sanction in a democracy.

For those of us that feel strongly about it, the question is where does the vote go that will translate into a difference?

Avatar
rggfddne | 9 years ago
0 likes

The consequences for missing said target are...?

Avatar
SRD | 9 years ago
0 likes

I wouldn't worry too much about security there. Lots of police/cameras.

Avatar
a_to_the_j | 9 years ago
0 likes

its a finger in the air joke "budget" and "target" from Holyrood, just the same we get from Westminster - its all the same from UK's politicians.
Just look at the proposals of the new road building programs for England, and Holyroods A9 and A96 dualling with absolutely no thought for cyclists at all....

Avatar
Darkerside | 9 years ago
0 likes

Nonsense; the early work is dead easy when you don't actually do anything.

Avatar
djcritchley | 9 years ago
0 likes

Interesting photo of the Scottish Parliament "Bike Stands" to go with the story. Lovely piece of art but I'm not convinced it is secure.

Avatar
SRD replied to djcritchley | 9 years ago
0 likes

The problem is that Mr Brown and his advisors have this bizarre belief that behavioural change comes from 'education' rather than from infrastructure. Like if we just tell everyone that its healthy to eat more veg, walk more, not smoke, breastfeed, not have unsafe sex, wear seat belts, etc we'll all just do that.

Avatar
Kim replied to djcritchley | 9 years ago
0 likes

@djcritchley Having used them, I have found them perfectly functional, which is more than I can say for the Scottish Government's Cycling Action Plan.

Unless the the Scottish Government make a real effort (which it certainly isn't now), it will miss it's target for 10% cycle modal share by 2020. Not only that it will miss it Health and Climate Change targets (which are under pinned by CAPS) as well. We can only hope that under the new leadership we will see Scotland become the modern, forward looking nation which the SNP are always claiming they want Scotland to be.

Scot Govt. really is drinking in the Last Chance Saloon, trouble is they haven't realised they are over the new limit to drive...

Latest Comments