Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Inverness council says "suicidal" cycle lane is safe

'Flagship' route to business/research campus comprises painted lanes on narrow road...

Despite strongly-worded concerns from local riders and an MSP, the local council has pronounced an Inverness cycle lane safe.

A stretch of a 'flagship' cycle route between Inverness and a new business and research campus at Beechwood consists of just painted lanes.

Local rider John Clark told The Inverness Courier's Ellie House he would ride on the pavement and risk being fined rather than use the lanes on King Duncan's Road.

Because the road has not been widened, drivers encroach on the lanes in order to pass each other.

“It is absolutely ridiculous to see just how little space there is for cyclists and pedestrians on a road that is already dangerous, particularly in winter,” Mr Clark said. “The lanes for traffic are only slightly bigger than the lanes for cycling.

“I tried to use the cycle route once and it was just too dangerous. You won’t catch me using that lane, it is suicidal.”

But after a safety audit carried out last week a council spokesman said: "There were no major findings which will change the operation of the cycleway/footpath."

MSP John Finnie is not impressed.

"I am absolutely astonished that nothing was identified through this safety audit and I will continue to see if anything can be done about this," he said.

But the local cycling campaign appears to be happy.

The council said: "A representative from the Highland Cycling Campaign attended and was satisfied with the process."

In a comment on the story, zenbikermaniac writes: "I was that representative and can confirm that I was indeed satisfied with the process.

"King Duncan's Road previously made no special provision for cyclists. Now there is a painted lane on both sides. This is far from ideal but it does clearly and repeatedly notify drivers to expect cyclists on the road.

"Motor vehicles are legally allowed to take up all or part of the cycling lane if they need to. But they must always be sure to leave plenty space for any cyclists.

"To allow a minimum 1.5 metre gap during overtaking, a car would have to be well over to the other side of the road. Any driver should be able to judge when this is safe or choose to hang back."

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

21 comments

Avatar
Peowpeowpeowlasers | 9 years ago
0 likes

Looking at it on Google Maps, I can't quite see why they didn't just widen the existing pavement by building further out, and putting an entirely new 2-way cycle path alongside the pavement. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to create a new surface designed to take a couple of hundred pounds here and there.

Avatar
mrmo replied to Peowpeowpeowlasers | 9 years ago
0 likes
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Looking at it on Google Maps, I can't quite see why they didn't just widen the existing pavement by building further out, and putting an entirely new 2-way cycle path alongside the pavement. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to create a new surface designed to take a couple of hundred pounds here and there.

which if not done properly puts pedestrians and cyclists in conflict rather than motorists and cyclists.

Avatar
Slartibartfast87 | 9 years ago
0 likes

I think zenbikermaniac needs to have a think about inclusive cycling, not just for the brave and fast.

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove | 9 years ago
0 likes

Issues & potential solution were flagged up on Ranty Highwayman's blog in Nov 2013:

http://therantyhighwayman.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/king-duncans-road-slipp...

Avatar
discominer | 9 years ago
0 likes

but hereabouts a double yellow line just means 'vehicles parked here should have two wheels on the pavement'.

Avatar
LondonDynaslow | 9 years ago
0 likes

And lots of dotted lanes are on single yellow lines. If you told anyone that they could only park on those single yellows IF UNAVOIDABLE they'd be surprised. And so would the traffic wardens. Out of single yellow hours, the reality is that they become on-street parking areas. If this isn't the law, then drivers need to have signs to say so.

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes

@Paul_C but are these lanes marked by solid lines or dotted lines? The former, cars should never be in them and the police... should be enforcing them. dotted well they are a waste of time.

Avatar
Paul_C | 9 years ago
0 likes

"140

Cycle lanes. These are shown by road markings and signs. You MUST NOT drive or park in a cycle lane marked by a solid white line during its times of operation. Do not drive or park in a cycle lane marked by a broken white line unless it is unavoidable. You MUST NOT park in any cycle lane whilst waiting restrictions apply.
Law RTRA sects 5 & 8"

is it unavoidable?

Avatar
youngoldbloke | 9 years ago
0 likes

Either a road is too narrow for cycle lanes, or a road is wide enough - in which case there is really no point. Why bother? And how does a cycle route end up costing £733000 anyway? Spend the money educating drivers.

Avatar
harrybav | 9 years ago
0 likes

A flagship route indeed. Pic is of a river.

Avatar
trekker12 | 9 years ago
0 likes

There's a similar sounding cycle lane near my commute home - I take occasionally to vary the rest of my route.

It's not a long road and there is a sign at each end stating "CYCLISTS PRIORITY ROUTE" and other sides stating cars can 'enter cycle lane when clear'. The road is just wide enough for two cars to pass and they have painted a cycle path 1.5m wide (at a guess) down each sides.

During rush hour it's lethal. You get completely ignored, the cars just don't wait and completely ignore what they are being told so if I'm in the lane or not they carry on squeezing past me and cars coming the other way.

It's OK though because those signs are keeping me safe!

Avatar
kitkat | 9 years ago
0 likes

Just assemble the councillors at rush hour (when cycle use would be highest) and make them ride down the road

Avatar
patto583 | 9 years ago
0 likes

There's a similar arrangement just outside Ambleside in the Lake District, it's a narrow bit of road just after a set of traffic lights. It's been there for years, and it's useless. It's a token effort to claim that they are putting in infrastructure so they can claim some extra money from Europe.

I get the feeling that the handing out of cash is based around countries that know how to build workable cycling facilities, and can be trusted to do that, whereas in the UK the local councils don't know what they are doing as far as cycling infrastructure is concerned. They look at a road that is bad to cycle on and think that a bit of green paint will make it all ok.

Avatar
A V Lowe | 9 years ago
0 likes

Traffic lane is sub standard to begin with. 7-seater is roughly 2 metres wide, so scaling from that the cycle lane is less than 1 metre (substandard) and the traffic lane probably well under 3 metres.

3.5m is generally accepted as standard traffic lane as most HGV/buses have body width of 2.55 - 2.6m and around 2.8m over mirrors. 3.5m allows for the dynamic envelope required for a non-guided transport system (where space required increases substantially as speed climbs - rail (a guided system) can work to closer limits as the driver cannot let the vehicle wander through failure to control the steering ..

The immediate visual impact is one which TSRGD (road signs manual) deprecates - far too much signage and clutter - because the narrow cycle lanes squeezed in with a centre line on narrow traffic lanes, plus the double yellow lines (why those are needed beggars belief - any vehicle stopped on that section of road would immediately be causing an obstruction and thus subject to removal/fines under s.129.2 Roads Scotland Act 1984 (I think max is same as s.137 HA 1980 (England & Wales) - £1000)

Avatar
kraut | 9 years ago
0 likes

"Motor vehicles are legally allowed to take up all or part of the cycling lane if they need to. But they must always be sure to leave plenty space for any cyclists."

So that's basically the same as not having the lane at all then? Except worse, because drivers will be pissed off if you stray outside the "cycle lane".

Avatar
Hamster | 9 years ago
0 likes

I believe Jon Snow is appropriate "paint on the road, does not make a cycling facility".

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Any driver should be able to judge when this is safe or choose to hang back.

But is it any cyclist's experience, that all drivers have good enough judgement, and are patient enough, to wait until it's safe to overtake?

No, obviously not. That's why cycling infrastructure is needed - but no crap infrastructure.

Avatar
cat1commuter | 9 years ago
0 likes

How wide is that cycle lane? 2.0 m is the national standard. It is allowed to be 1.5 m where there isn't space. If I was cycling that road without the lane being painted, I wouldn't cycle as close to the kerb as the outside of the painted lane!

How about two 2.0 m advisory lanes, and no centre line in the road?

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove replied to cat1commuter | 9 years ago
0 likes
cat1commuter wrote:

How about two 2.0 m advisory lanes, and no centre line in the road?

While aware I may incur the wrath of David Hembrow for over simplification/misrepresentation, that is a treatment that the Dutch employ on some roads.

Whether this road is suitable for that treatment or not is a different matter.

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 9 years ago
0 likes

The photo in the local paper makes it quite clear why the cycle lane is utterly useless and unfit for purpose. It reduces safety for cyclists The road is too narrow so motor vehicles have to encroach into the cycle lane. It would be safer if the cycle lane were removed altogether and cyclists encouraged to 'take the lane' so that motor vehicles cannot pass until there is sufficient space. The only other alternative would be to make the pavement mixed use cycle/pedestrian lane at the pinch point.

For the council to claim the cycle lane is safe shows clearly that those making the decisions do not cycle and don't understand the safety issues.

Avatar
STATO | 9 years ago
0 likes

"the cycle lanes on King Duncan Road, which vehicles travelling in opposite directions must enter in order to pass each other"

You have to wonder when even cycle campaigners dont understand how cycle markings work.

Latest Comments