Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Video: British Transport Police show how NOT to pass a cyclist

Police vehicle swerves to left of rider to undertake before pulling back in front of him

Here’s a video showing how NOT to pass a cyclist – courtesy albeit unintentionally of British Transport Police (BTP).

It was filmed in Leeds at the interchange of the A58 and A58 (M) from a vehicle travelling behind the police car which is initially stationary behind the cyclist, who is in an advanced stop line box.

The video shows the BTP 4x4 accelerating away from the lights as they change, swerving to the rider’s left and into a lane that would take it onto the A58 (M) to pass him, before cutting back in in front of the rider to return to the A58.

YouTube user arronls, who posted the video under the title ‘British Transport Police show us how it’s done,’ wrote in the description: “Nice to see them setting an example and demonstrating the safest way to approach vulnerable road users.”

Rule 163 of the Highway Code tells road users “Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so,” and that among other things “you should:

• not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake
• use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick sideways glance if necessary into the blind spot area and then start to move out
• move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in
• only overtake on the left if the vehicle in front is signalling to turn right, and there is room to do so
• give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car.”

 

Guardian journalist Peter Walker, who retweeted a link to the video posted by Cycling Embassy of Great Britain chair Mark Treasure, was told by BTP on Twitter that the footage had been referred to the force’s Driving Standards department.

 

 

A spokesman for BTP told road.cc: “We are aware of a video online, showing one of our vehicles and a cyclist at traffic lights, said to be in Leeds. We are carrying out enquiries into the contents of the video.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
Tongietr8 | 9 years ago
0 likes

I don't see where the problem is! This happens to me about twice a day! The whole of the UK's drivers that don't ride are like this! I am absolutely sick of them all. It's about time the law or driver's minds are changed about cyclists.
You just don;t get any of this riding in France or Spain! Just why are we a nation or cyclist hating petrol heads?

Avatar
CommotionLotion | 9 years ago
0 likes

Leeds city centre is a death trap for cyclists,  13

Avatar
Sit at the back... | 9 years ago
0 likes

No doubt the BTP had an "excuse" - called to an incident, tea break overdue etc. no doubt he set off much faster than all the other cars. that is no excuse for shoddy driving and it happens all the time. Take possession of the lane you are in, position yourself where the driver of a car would be, do not ride in the gutter or on lane markings. Most of all don't expect other road users to be good drivers.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Pardon my ignorance, but how/where does one write to Robert Goodwill? Can he be emailed?

I copied him in to an email to my MP, as his website says he'll only reply to his own constituents. Otherwise, you can write a paper letter to him as Under Secretary at the Department for Transport.

Avatar
ydrol | 9 years ago
0 likes

Another "dual destination" lane where it is best to make early approach to the right of the lane, if going straight ahead ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-ujuJXNq3w contrary to the blue paint.. er I mean .. super highway.

Avatar
The _Kaner | 9 years ago
0 likes

A few weeks ago I was 'tailed' by a Gardaí Traffic Corps car, along an ambiguously sign posted 'newish' road...goes from a 50, to a 60 (about 30metres with solid white lines due to bends in the road) then into an 80kph, whereas the opposite lane (not a dual carriageway) is clearly signposted as 80kph
...the 80kph sign on my side 'appears' some 1.3kms along the road...I kept just above the 50/60...with a clear road in front of me and when I reached the 80kph sign I sped up to around 78kph and stuck on the cruise control
...the Gardaí car followed for 3 more kms, didn't bother to try and pass me with at least 2 safe places with broken white lines....the second we move back to a double white...he then pulls out and overtakes me and continues to accelerate well past 95kph....I guess his pizza was getting cold.
Now, had I maintained anything above 60 on that ambiguously sign posted stretch I can bet he would have pulled me over....

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde | 9 years ago
0 likes

It's a horrible junction for any cyclist. Three lanes into four means that the middle lane competes with those turning left (whom believe they will over take traffic in the left-hand lane and possibly slower traffic wanting to turn right.

Personally I would take the lane to prevent unwarranted undertaking (in either the middle or right-hand lane). The traffic knows to hold it's position until I'm in mine. Effectively, because the cyclist sits between lanes he invites twits to try and undertake and because they think that there's enough room. I just wouldn't cede the space to them that easily until I was happy to do so.

Avatar
fancynancy | 9 years ago
0 likes

I had an experience with a BTP vehicle on my way home once & they were deliberately intimidating. Following closely; determined to get past me, even in standstill traffic.

The cyclist above is in the correct position, although on first glance he looks to be too far over.

I often find if one car gives a lot of space when overtaking, others behind follow suit. However if someone overtakes close then others behind will also take silly risks. If the bloody BTP cannot overtake properly then what hope is there...

Avatar
GrahamSt | 9 years ago
0 likes

Posting that same picture on facebook resulted in me being called a "f**king muppet" and a "retard"  2

Avatar
GrahamSt | 9 years ago
0 likes

Reading the comments on the road.cc facebook feed it's a bit depressing how many people (most of whom are presumably cyclists themselves) think that the police driver did absolutely nothing wrong and/or that the cyclist was in the wrong.

It may not have been the worst bit of driving ever, but it wasn't exactly a shining example to set to the public either. If the police happily ignore the Highway Code for no good reason then how can we expect anyone else to follow it?

For the record, here are the lanes marked onto a still from the video. The cyclist's position looks spot on to me.

Avatar
zanf replied to GrahamSt | 9 years ago
0 likes
GrahamSt wrote:

Reading the comments on the road.cc facebook feed it's a bit depressing how many people (most of whom are presumably cyclists themselves) think that the police driver did absolutely nothing wrong and/or that the cyclist was in the wrong.

I gave up reading after the first 'chain' of comments. The guy made an assertion, was proven wrong, made another, proven wrong again, made claim that he was an advanced driver and cyclist of 40 years and tried to parry but failed, got proven wrong again and called ignorant for repeatedly make false assertions based in fantasy. His response was to cry about someone making it personal.

Im glad all the idiots stay on FB and not clutter up the main site. 3 years Ive been free of that place and life is the better for it.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to GrahamSt | 8 years ago
0 likes

It is absolutely clear where the cyclist intends to go, although I think I would have taken the centre of the middle lane at that junction.

If the police car is in a hurry he should use blues and twos to move into the right hand lane and go, if not on an emergency he should wait behind cyclist until safe to pass, just as the following driver has done. Moving to the lane that is for a different destination and cutting back in is just poor, especially when the cyclist is clearly going to move to the left of the lane once clear of the junction, so the space the car is trying to go through will be getting smaller.

Avatar
Airzound | 9 years ago
0 likes

Police camera action

Avatar
Eebijeebi | 9 years ago
0 likes

Naughty for the jump start.
Slapped wrist for crossing the hatch markings (they're not solid lined).
No problem passing on the left on a one way street.
No danger to the cyclist whatsoever.
Storm in a teacup.

Avatar
Peowpeowpeowlasers replied to Eebijeebi | 9 years ago
0 likes
Eebijeebi wrote:

Naughty for the jump start.
Slapped wrist for crossing the hatch markings (they're not solid lined).
No problem passing on the left on a one way street.
No danger to the cyclist whatsoever.
Storm in a teacup.

Take your car on the road and do the exact same thing to a police officer, in his/her car.

See what happens.

Avatar
Eebijeebi replied to Peowpeowpeowlasers | 9 years ago
0 likes
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:
Eebijeebi wrote:

Naughty for the jump start.
Slapped wrist for crossing the hatch markings (they're not solid lined).
No problem passing on the left on a one way street.
No danger to the cyclist whatsoever.
Storm in a teacup.

Take your car on the road and do the exact same thing to a police officer, in his/her car.

See what happens.

Well if they had cars that only go the speed of a push bike I would, and there would be nothing for them to complain about.

Avatar
banzicyclist2 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Your nicked!  41

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes

I wrote to cycling minister Robert Goodwill recently, asking him to implement British Cycling's suggestion that rule 163 on overtakes be clarified, and proposing that he could do some media interviews to make people aware of how they should be overtaking cyclists. I asked him to consider French-style signs, reminding drivers to leave plenty of room when overtaking.

I got the reply today. Rule 163 exists, it's perfectly adequate, and there's no need for signs to remind people of their obligations under the Highway Code.

He's wrong, and this is one of a million pieces of evidence showing that rule 163 is routinely ignored.

I think it's a shame that we have a cycling minister who is doing nothing to stand up for cyclists. My impression is that he thinks his job is to be an apologist for the status quo.

Avatar
Ric_Stern_RST replied to HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

I wrote to cycling minister Robert Goodwill recently, asking him to implement British Cycling's suggestion that rule 163 on overtakes be clarified, and proposing that he could do some media interviews to make people aware of how they should be overtaking cyclists. I asked him to consider French-style signs, reminding drivers to leave plenty of room when overtaking.

I got the reply today. Rule 163 exists, it's perfectly adequate, and there's no need for signs to remind people of their obligations under the Highway Code.

He's wrong, and this is one of a million pieces of evidence showing that rule 163 is routinely ignored.

I think it's a shame that we have a cycling minister who is doing nothing to stand up for cyclists. My impression is that he thinks his job is to be an apologist for the status quo.

Pardon my ignorance, but how/where does one write to Robert Goodwill? Can he be emailed?

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to HarrogateSpa | 8 years ago
0 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

.

I got the reply today. Rule 163 exists, it's perfectly adequate, and there's no need for signs to remind people of their obligations under the Highway Code.

.

rule 163 is ambiguous, as many people take it to mean pass vulnerable road users as close you would pass a car.

It's also not very widely known.

Avatar
PonteD | 9 years ago
0 likes

And I wonder why, whenever I complain to the police in Leeds about shoddy driving they tell me the driver has done nothing wrong.

Avatar
GrahamSt | 9 years ago
0 likes

For anyone interested I think this is the StreetView of the correct junction:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.7995838,-1.5529322,3a,75y,279.71h,80.21t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sKv8rX7NczGgJ0Z_Whi6AoQ!2e0?hl=en

Avatar
hampstead_bandit | 9 years ago
0 likes

I used to work for BTP in London, not the first time I have seen former colleagues in the news  40

Avatar
ydrol | 9 years ago
0 likes

Yes 3 lanes going into 4 suggest middle lane traffic can flow left or right. So the cyclists position was one of the two best positions. Probably the best. The other might be centre of the lane?

They also move left as soon as it was safe to do so.

Avatar
balmybaldwin | 9 years ago
0 likes

On a brighter note, the lorry/bus with the camera behaves impecably, slowing his speed and crossing into the outside lane when safe to overtake.

Avatar
jollygoodvelo | 9 years ago
0 likes

Pretty shoddy. I do hope the driver is educated as to his error.

Avatar
The _Kaner | 9 years ago
0 likes

" I had just received an emergency call, and had to negotiate another road user as best/quickly as the circumstances allowed....it was only a cyclist...I'm sure he must have at least ran one red light today and terrorised some motorists unjustly...he's lucky I didn't arrest him for being a public nuisance" amid some back slapping and cheers from the public gallery....

Avatar
GrahamSt | 9 years ago
0 likes

Also notice that the police car rolls forward and then has to brake before the lights have even gone amber.
Just bad driving or trying to intimidate?

Avatar
hairyairey | 9 years ago
0 likes

The cyclist was not in the wrong place he was avoiding being forced onto the A58(M) and contrary to what you might think our place is not at the left side of the road we are entitled to use any of it (except motorways).

The Police Car should have come around him the right way and I see hash-marking abuse too. You will usually get a warning from traffic police for this behaviour (although there might be a reason like not being able to see your destination until it's too late). Hash-marking surrounded by solid lines should only ever be crossed to avoid a collision.

Shoddy driving and yes he'll get a reprimand at best although in my experience the response will probably claim his actions were justified (just as one officer has so far tried to justify assaulting myself without warning).

Avatar
racyrich | 9 years ago
0 likes

You know the score, pal. [If] You're not cop, you're little people!

Always a good time for a Blade Runner quote.

Pages

Latest Comments