Home
Helmeted rider hit gravel on bend, according to eyewitness

In what is being described as a freak accident, a 40-year-old man died on Sunday after falling off his bike on a descent in Richmond Park, Surrey.

Police were called to the crash which occurred just before 09:30 on Sunday morning. The man, who has not yet been named, was taken by London's Air Ambulance to the Royal London Hospital in a critical condition, but later died from his injuries.

The rider is reported to have crashed as a result of hitting gravel while descending Broomfield Hill/Dark Hill, near the park's south-eastern edge.

The man was put into the recovery position by a passing doctor. He was wearing a helmet and is thought to have been travelling at about 15 mph. The speed limit in Richmond Park is 20mph.

Oliver Prior, who was riding up the hill as the man came down it, told Mary Isokariari of the Evening Standard: "The man was coming down on the outside of the bend where the road has the most amount of gravel. He bike slipped from underneath him and he fell and hit his head.

“There was a doctor, who just happened to be cycling and he organised for three people to help move the man into the recovery position. My friend was one of them."

The Metropolitan Police said that the deceased's next of kin had been notified and that the MPS Royal Parks Command Unit is now investigating.

No one else was involved in the incident.

Our official grumpy Northerner, John has been riding bikes for over 30 years since discovering as an uncoordinated teen that a sport could be fun if it didn't require you to catch a ball or get in the way of a hulking prop forward.

Road touring was followed by mountain biking and a career racing in the mud that was as brief as it was unsuccessful.

Somewhere along the line came the discovery that he could string a few words together, followed by the even more remarkable discovery that people were mug enough to pay for this rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work. He's pretty certain he's worked for even more bike publications than Mat Brett.

The inevitable 30-something MAMIL transition saw him shift to skinny tyres and these days he lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

34 comments

Avatar
mad_scot_rider [581 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

My sympathies for his loved ones - unfortunately freak accidents can occur anywhere & anytime

Avatar
notfastenough [3674 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

RIP. You just don't know when it's your turn.

Please, please, please, can we not turn this into a helmet debate? Blah blah impact speed blah blah helmet didn't save him blah blah. The poor guy's died, can we just leave it at that?

Avatar
YorkshireMike [91 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

I was going to comment the same. Sincerest sympathies for his friends and family.

Avatar
Paul J [882 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Tragic.  2

Avatar
nuclear coffee [208 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Love the hypocrisy - anytime someone not wearing a helmet dies, that's totally allowed as ammunition for an argument. At least nobody seems to complain.

But evidence this logic is wrong is not.

If you object to turning someone's death into an argument, do so on both sides please.

RIP. Sorry but I didn't start this trend.

Avatar
Paul_C [446 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

I blame the gravel on the side of the road...  2

Avatar
vbvb [588 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Comments normally disabled on fatality stories surely?

Avatar
bikebot [1893 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
vbvb wrote:

Comments normally disabled on fatality stories surely?

Comments are closed if they would interfere with a prosecution, but this is a tragic accident with no other party involved.

Some news sites will close comments due to trolling and abuse. I expect everyone using road.cc is far removed from such behaviour.

Avatar
Beatnik69 [316 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Maybe just ones where it looks like there will be a legal prosecution?

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will [470 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

As already said... you just never know when its your turn to go!

RIP

Avatar
Angelfishsolo [132 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

My sympathies to the family.

Avatar
alexb [127 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Perhaps We can see the use of gravel as a top dressing eliminated in Richmond Park now?

Tragic as this is, if the local authority don't act, then a decent lawyer will be able to argue that they are liable for all and any injuries attributed to loose gravel.

Avatar
KiwiMike [1186 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

@ Nuclearcoffee: brave post. Chapeau. I agree totally. Guaranteed it would have been a shitstorm of 'Tragic But...' 'Terrible for the family But...' 'Some of my best friends don't wear helmets But...'

In discussing population-level issues (which helmet promotion let alone legislation is) *every* evidence point is a personal tragedy for those concerned. Discussion of the wider issue does not subtract from that or our compassion for those suffering a life-changing loss. We should acknowledge this for what it is: proof positive that 160gm of coffee-cup material full of holes will not save your life, even at low speed, on a flat surface, with no other vehicle involved. Do not rely on it. Putting aside libertarian views on personal risk, responsibility and the state's interference or lack thereof: If you ride faster, further or take more risk wearing one you have been fooled by an industry selling a comfort blanket that just doesn't work.

Avatar
truffy [653 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Wearing a helmet does not guarantee safety in the event of an accident, not wearing a helmet does not guarantee injury. It merely shifts the odds. We don't know the cause of death, just that he fell and hit his head. There are a multitude of factors that play towards the tragic outcome.

Let it rest.

Commiserations to the family and friends of the deceased.

Avatar
benclark88 [12 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

@KiwiMike

Firstly, my condolences to his family. I was there on Sunday and at the time it was clearly serious.

Secondly, I don't wish to turn this into an argument after someone has died, but please don't use one incident as evidence helmets are pointless, or even dangerous. Yes, in this case, it appears the helmet did not save his life. However, no-one knows all the factors involved here.

Full studies of incidents involving head injuries, or simulations of, should be the only evidence into account. Yes, this one incident would or could form part of that, but a single incident is never evidence on its own.

If you personally feel helmets are unnecessary or inadequate, feel free to not wear one, or perhaps one designed for motorsports users. I understand you may have a grievance against legislation (where I would agree with you) but I don't think it's fair to read this incident as positive evidence that you can discard your helmet when riding a road bike at speed.

Hopefully this discussion won't become aggressive, and we all just remember that there are many factors involved in serious injury.

Avatar
allezrider [92 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Tragic accident and quite shocking personally having come off at that sort of speed recently.

Simply coming off at 15mph should not cause life threatening injuries, helmetted or not, which suggests to me that the poor chap has either hit something else or had some other medical reason for falling in the first place.

As has been said you never know when it's your time - makes me gratefull to be here and able to post.

Avatar
massspike [139 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

A tragedy but I am curious about the "wearing a helmet" bit:

Was it a "modern" helmet (in terms of design and materials)? I still see people riding with those old Styrofoam buckets that offer limited protection.

Was it the right size? I once assisted a woman with a nasty head injury who was wearing a undersized helmet that left her forehead exposed -- I guess it passed the mirror test though.

Was it being worn (adjusted) properly? Or like the people that wear them tipped back on their head or worse yet like a beret.

Avatar
mrmo [2070 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
massspike wrote:

A tragedy but I am curious about the "wearing a helmet" bit:

Was it a "modern" helmet (in terms of design and materials)? I still see people riding with those old Styrofoam buckets that offer limited protection.

irrelevant, the only element that might be, is how old the helmet is, i.e. how degraded. Most current helmets are actually worse than those sold 20 years ago, the current standards are actually lower for most manufacturers, i believe that only Specialized still use the stricter Snell standard.

People seem to place so much faith in, what is in essence a crap piece of safety equipment.

wear a helmet don't wear a helmet, i don't care, just don't believe it is miraculous, don't believe that it will help in every situation, it won't. This is why helmets must not be compulsory, and why the courts need to be educated as to just how crap, and how little help a helmet is.

RIP.

Avatar
deblemund [263 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Could you please disable comments on this story.

Avatar
notfastenough [3674 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
nuclear coffee wrote:

Love the hypocrisy - anytime someone not wearing a helmet dies, that's totally allowed as ammunition for an argument. At least nobody seems to complain.

But evidence this logic is wrong is not.

If you object to turning someone's death into an argument, do so on both sides please.

RIP. Sorry but I didn't start this trend.

I was doing on both sides. This isn't the place for it, regardless of which perspective you have.

Avatar
russellbodycomb [3 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Tragic & sympathies
Question "the speed limit for Richmond Park is 20mph" - surely that is for cars not cycles?

Avatar
mrmo [2070 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
russellbodycomb wrote:

Tragic & sympathies
Question "the speed limit for Richmond Park is 20mph" - surely that is for cars not cycles?

I suggest you do a bit of googling on this, there is a story on here somewhere.

Basically Royal Parks think they can, and as a result they have enforced a 20mph limit on cyclists, at this time no one has tried to legally challenge a fine, although it has been suggested that the way Royal Parks is reading the law is questionable.

Avatar
Dr_Lex [287 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
mrmo wrote:
russellbodycomb wrote:

Tragic & sympathies
Question "the speed limit for Richmond Park is 20mph" - surely that is for cars not cycles?

I suggest you do a bit of googling on this, there is a story on here somewhere.

Basically Royal Parks think they can, and as a result they have enforced a 20mph limit on cyclists, at this time no one has tried to legally challenge a fine, although it has been suggested that the way Royal Parks is reading the law is questionable.

This CTC thread suggests the logic by which one might challenge a bicycle speeding prosecution in Richmond Park.

(Condolences to the rider's family, should any of them be reading this train-wreck of a thread).

Avatar
rogermerriman [78 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

People die from falls, just tripping or what ever. You can suffer a serious head injoury at zero speed since it's a fair way head to ground. Not just the old and imfirm, or drunk.

Maybe he made a mistake maybe he didn't, very Sad regardless for those who knew him.

Avatar
Binky [116 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Surely coming off at 15mph (the estimate) can't kill? I have crashed going faster than that.

Maybe something happened when they moved him?

Avatar
rogermerriman [78 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

People die or are seriously injured at zero or close to zero from falls, the skull is strong but not uniformly so, though the danger is in terms of head injuries is not the skull but the brain.

When you stand or ride a bike your head is a fair way from the ground, enought to fracture a skull and more.

Sure it's perfectly possible to crash at quite high speeds and dust your self off, but worryingly the reverse is true that it's possible to do serious if not fatual harm by a "minor" fall.

This guy was clearly desperately unlucky to not of walked away, but it's certainly possible.

Avatar
fukawitribe [1686 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
Binky wrote:

Surely coming off at 15mph (the estimate) can't kill? I have crashed going faster than that.

Maybe something happened when they moved him?

Yes you can unfortunately, and less, for reasons that might be best discussed elsewhere. Condolences to the family.

Avatar
vanmildert [50 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
notfastenough wrote:

RIP. You just don't know when it's your turn.

Please, please, please, can we not turn this into a helmet debate? Blah blah impact speed blah blah helmet didn't save him blah blah. The poor guy's died, can we just leave it at that?

Agree - shame your plea didn't work. No further comment....

Avatar
Pret [38 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

RIP fot the cyclist. Btw folks speed limit does not apply to bicycles. http://www.astounding.org.uk/ian/cyclelaw/speed_limits.html

Avatar
Pret [38 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Sorry for the family

Pages