Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

British Cycling calls for regulation of sportives after Yorkshire route clash (+ video)

Governing body responds after video shows two events hitting same stretch of road on Sunday

British Cycling says that sportives need to regulated to avoid issues such as the clash of the route of one such event and a road race that we featured in a video on road.cc this morning.

The governing body points out that while strict regulations surround races held on public roads, the regime is looser when it comes to sportive rides.

On Sunday, riders taking part in the Yorkshire Regional Road Race, an event authorised by police under the Cycle Racing on the Highway regulations and organised in line with what British Cycling describes as its “minimum standards” rounded a corner to discover a sportive heading in the opposite direction.

A spokesperson for British Cycling said: “This video is a perfect illustration of why the lack of any form of calendar co-ordination and regulation around sportives is a serious concern that needs to be urgently addressed.

“Over the last three years, there has been an unprecedented growth in the number of sportives with an almost 200% increase in the number of events that were registered through British Cycling alone.

“We’re asking the government to take action to ensure that cycling events on the public highway are better co-ordinated through an agreed process.

“These measures would aim to reduce the risk of clashes, improve event standards and provide an environment where both competitive and non-competitive events can run in harmony to meet increased demand.”

Both events were listed on the British Cycling website, but the governing body says that the sportive in question, the Cyclothon organised on behalf of the Prince of Wales Hospice in Wetherby, had not been formally registered with it.

“If it had been registered a clash would have been identified in advance of the events taking place and any issues would have been resolved,” it added.

Last year, Surrey County Council said it planned to lobby for regulation of sportives there following a rise in the number of events taking in the county’s roads after it hosted much of the route of the Olympic road races in 2012.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

31 comments

Avatar
vorsprung replied to john.berry | 9 years ago
0 likes
john.berry wrote:

I am NOT a fan of Sportives, I think people tend to turn them into a race,there is also the I paid my money so I don't need to obey the highway code attitude (by a minority), but what really does worry me is how will any regulation distinguish between Audax and Sportive?

I would hate to see Audax being impacted by the current passing fad of cycling and Sportives.

Some grumblers at AUK have said for a few years now, as sportives became more popular, that their lack of regulation and lack of differentiation with road racing was bound to lead to problems.

AUK have a proper membership process, routes are already risk accessed by a standard process and the regulations of AUK are specifically designed to avoid any confusion with races of the sort we see in that video.

AUK also have strong links with international bodies and have recently (within the past two years) loosened any link with British Cycling

I don't really believe that British Cycling want to take on regulating all cycling events in the UK

I do not believe that AUK would want to organise rides on roads using a framework based on what British Cycling say.

It's not because AUK dislike British Cycling in an irrational way. It's just that their objectives and AUKs are different. They favour competitive sport, AUK favour non competitive sport.

btw I do not hold any position on the AUK board, my opinions about what the AUK think are just my (I think well informed) opinions

The CTC might well have other objections to some kind of British Cycling organised regulations on events.

Pages

Latest Comments