6,000 candidates, 624 wards - innovative online map enables Londoners to contact candidates to call for action

In what it says is the first initiative of its type ever launched by any campaign group, London Cycling Campaign (LCC) is to lobby 6,000 candidates in next month’s London local elections to make the city’s streets safer for cyclists – with improvements being sought mapped on a ward-by-ward basis.

The initiative falls under the Space For Cycling campaign, launched last November by LCC following a two-week period in which six London cyclists were killed.

With local elections also due to take place across England next month, including in all 36 metropolitan boroughs, LCC will shortly be joining CTC as well as cycle campaigners in cities including Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Manchester, Newcastle and Sheffield to lobby local authroities and call for Space or Cycling.

In London, volunteers in each of the city’s 32 boroughs (the City of London has a separate electoral system) as well as a survey of 4,500 local residents, helped the organisation identify the needs of specific wards.

Those include:

Install protected cycle lanes in a newly created Bradley Wiggins Way (Kilburn ward, Brent)

Remove through motor traffic from the cycling corridor on Tavistock Place (Bloomsbury ward, Camden)

Create safe cycle routes for children linking six schools in Tufnell Park (Junction ward, Islington).

As part of the campaign, LCC has launched an online mapping tool that allows London residents to put in their postcode to find their ward and see what is being sought from candidates there, and email them to ask for their support in implementing it.

Anyone – Londoner or otherwise – can browse the map to see what is being asked for across the city and, as the elections approach, see responses from candidates.

According to LCC, “each local demand for cycling improvements falls into one of six categories, which are the key themes of the nationwide Space for Cycling campaign.” Those are:

1.        Protected space on mains roads and at junctions

2.        Removal of through motor traffic

3.        20mph speed limits

4.        Safe cycle routes to schools

5.        Cycle-friendly town centres

6.        Cycle routes through parks and green spaces

LCC’s chief executive Ashok Sinha said: “Council elections should be about local issues, and our Space for Cycling campaign will focus local politicians, and would-be councillors, on making our neighbourhoods safer and more inviting for everyone to cycle and walk.

“Many local people don’t feel safe cycling or crossing the road in residential and local shopping streets. Our proposals for local cycling improvements will, when put in place, dramatically change the character of London streets for everyone’s benefit.”

“This is a non-partisan, grass-roots campaign. Our amazing volunteer teams have used their local knowledge to identify the 624 measures to be taken - one in each ward - and we call on politicians from all parties to give these measures their support.”

LCC says that its campaign is being supported by the Bicycle Association of GB, Evans Cycles, and the Dutch National Embassy.

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.


CanAmSteve [253 posts] 2 years ago

I found it amusing that despite part of Hyde Park being accessible to cyclists, the requested action is protected cycle lanes along Bayswater Road. That leads you into the Marble Arch gyratory, which is dangerous and off-putting. But cyclists can enter the park past Lancaster Gate and ride legally part way along. So it would make better sense to integrate the two.

The Royal Parks are OK with horses (posh people) but not with cycles (poor people). In fact, in Kensington Gardens, there is automobile access to Kensington Place from the north (across from Orme Sq) but cycling is prohibited (or appears to be - it's not made clear). So cars OK - cycles not. There is a wide path of 100 metres or so that links to the approved cycle area - this is posted No Cycling despite leading directly to a Boris Bike rack. The Orme Sq entrance is much more amenable to bikes as the other is the bottom of Queensway - one way north and congested.

And of course all the tourists get Boris Bikes and ride where they want anyway - usually on the "wrong" side - so it's chaos. I'm sure Royal Parks collects lots of fines from tourists (not).

AndrewRH [56 posts] 2 years ago

This is fantastic work and will put cycling front-and-centre at the local elections in London. Pleased to see, too, that CTC are running a CAMPAIGNER'S CONFERENCE on 3 May in Leeds to enable similar efforts throughout the UK.
Many individual cycle groups and campaigns are also defining what 'space for cycling' means to them in their local area.
There's a list of many of them on the independent, volunteer-run website at SPACE FOR CYCLING.

rogermerriman [87 posts] 2 years ago

Bushy Park is quite good for relaxed riding on the whole walkers/horses/bikes/cars etc get on, it is same size as Hyde park but far less busy hence the parks relaxed attitude here, competed to Richmond Park where they are not!

LCC like sustrans seem to like one subset of cycling and in some ways feel left behind in many ways.

fluffy_mike [100 posts] 2 years ago

re. comment about Hyde Park above ... sadly, the Royal Parks aren't anything to do with council elections. They do what they want, which is normally feck all for cycling.

Simon_MacMichael [2459 posts] 2 years ago
rogermerriman wrote:

Bushy Park is quite good for relaxed riding on the whole walkers/horses/bikes/cars etc get on, it is same size as Hyde park but far less busy hence the parks relaxed attitude here, competed to Richmond Park where they are not!

LCC like sustrans seem to like one subset of cycling and in some ways feel left behind in many ways.

Difference being that Hyde Park (and environs) is smack bang in the middle of London, on major commuter routes, and Bushy Park isn't?

arfa [777 posts] 2 years ago

Hyde park has improved hugely over the last 20 years when there was pretty much no access. Now it is a major link route and you can get off road pretty much all the way from bayswater/high street Kensington to trafalgar square off road.

I have used the LCC link for my local ward as it takes 30 seconds and the more that do so, the greater the likelihood of positive change.