Home
Car-centric thinking lingers in Motorway City of the 70s

Leeds City Council has voted down a proposal to spend less on milage allowances for council staff cars and more on cycling infrastructure.

According to the Yorkshire Evening Post, opposition Liberal Democrat councillors suggested the council could save £420,000 per year by reducing the petrol allowance for higher-powered vehicles from 65p per mile to the standard 45p set by HMRC.

But at a budget-setting meeting this week, councillors of the Motorway City of the 70s voted down the proposal.

Leeds hosts the Tour de France Grand Départ on July 5, but campaigners have questioned whether the event will raise the profile of everyday cycling. They say that in a city in which cycling accounts for just an estimated half a percent of journeys, hosting the Tour will simply cement the idea that cycling is a sport for the very fit, and not a feasible way of getting around.

Stewart Galton, Liberal Democrat groups leader on the council, said it was time for the council to “put its money where its mouth is” when it comes to its ‘cycling city’ ambitions, and to “seize the opportunity presented by the Tour de France to improve cycling in Leeds and get more people cycling”.

He said: “With the Tour de France coming to Leeds, 2014 is the best opportunity we’ll ever have to get more people cycling in the city. But the council seems unable to adopt an approach that doesn’t prioritise motorists above other road users.”

Leeds is planning a ‘super cycleway’ to connect with neighbouring Bradford, but campaigners say cycling provision is on the whole woeful, and diverting money from subsidising council workers’ use of gas-guzzlers into cycling infrastructure would be a step in the right direction.

Lizzie Reather, chair of the Leeds Cycling Campaign, said that Leeds is generally still “anti-cycling”.

“Cycling in Leeds is absolutely not safe and a lot more could be done,” she told the Evening Post.

“The cycle superhighway is really good but it’s really just one road. What are they going to do about the rest of the city?”

She said the savings on higher level petrol claims could be used sensibly to realign roads when routine maintenance work is being done. She added: “The council should not be spending public money unnecessarily encouraging car use by its staff which is both unsustainable and economically costly.”

Council leader Keith Wakefield said the authority’s “commitment to cycling has never been stronger”.

On the issue of milage rates, he said: “Changes to mileage rates are one of a number of issues already under discussion with staff and trade unions. It is right that we allow those discussions to conclude before taking any decisions.”

Our official grumpy Northerner, John has been riding bikes for over 30 years since discovering as an uncoordinated teen that a sport could be fun if it didn't require you to catch a ball or get in the way of a hulking prop forward.

Road touring was followed by mountain biking and a career racing in the mud that was as brief as it was unsuccessful.

Somewhere along the line came the discovery that he could string a few words together, followed by the even more remarkable discovery that people were mug enough to pay for this rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work. He's pretty certain he's worked for even more bike publications than Mat Brett.

The inevitable 30-something MAMIL transition saw him shift to skinny tyres and these days he lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

13 comments

Avatar
YorkshireMike [91 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Riding through Leeds you can tell its heart really isn't in making cycling a priority. Roads/junctions - cyclists are always an afterthought, and this compounds that. As my home town, I will be embarrassed if nothing changes fundamentally before July.  14

Avatar
drfabulous0 [409 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It is an absolute disgrace that they are spending taxpayers' money on 65p per mile allowances for motoring when as a private businessman the maximum allowed is 45p.

Avatar
Yorkshie Whippet [530 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Ahh more councillors mumbling something about the peasants eating cake.

More to the point howcome they get 65p a mile, some of us are restricted to 27p regardless of engine size.

Avatar
timothypulleyn [11 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Sickening. Arrogant fat cats.

Avatar
Paul_C [463 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It's a disgrace that they're getting anything. They should have pool cars for official business. Little super economic ones... not big swanky BMWs and Audis... Ideally, they should also have pool bicycles for short journeys.

Make them eat their own dogfood in IT terms... They'd soon get the cycling infrastructure sorted out if they actually had to use it themselves.

Apparently we're in austerity measures and supposed to be cutting our carbon footprint as well, you wouldn't think so the way they spend other people's money on themselves and burn petrol/diesel while doing it...

Avatar
Oscarzero [24 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Councilors trying to avoid a smaller lining in their pockets rather than improving the health, wellbeing & safety of those who live in the city that they are supposed to represent. Sad but only too typical.

Avatar
dp24 [201 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

65p a mile? Alright for some, it seems.

Avatar
bambergbike [89 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Pool bicycles would be an ideal way for council staff and councillors to get around - not just because it's cheap and very quick, but because riding through town at 10 - 20 mph with on's eyes wide open and no pesky A-frames in the way is a great way to stay connected with local realities and aware of all new developments.

Avatar
hoski [81 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Council leader Keith Wakefield said the authority’s “commitment to cycling has never been stronger”.

I believe the correct term is 'LOL'.

Avatar
ragtag [217 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

“commitment to cycling has never been stronger”.

Aspiring to do very little, is still very little.

Avatar
qwerky [184 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It's worth remembering that the 45p figure is set by HM Revenue. Anything over this could be considered a benefit in kind, and as such could be considered taxable.

Of course as public servants I'm sure all council staff declare the amount of personal milage they claim to the taxman.

Avatar
Paul M [360 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
drfabulous0 wrote:

It is an absolute disgrace that they are spending taxpayers' money on 65p per mile allowances for motoring when as a private businessman the maximum allowed is 45p.

Not quite correct - 45p is the maximum amount per mile which HMRC will accept as an allowance which is not taxed as a benefit. 65p/mile would give rise to at least 20p/mile being taxed as a benefit on the claimant, or indeed arguably all of it could be - the rule is no that the first 45p is not taxed, rather than no argument will be made to tax any of it as long as it doesn't exceed 45p.

Avatar
msfergus [22 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

The lack of commitment here is very sad. As a city, Leeds is crying out for better use of bikes as commuter transport and it really wouldn't be that difficult given the number of schemes which could be taken 'off the shelf'. Councillors could even go and visit some of these schemes in other towns to ensure they max out on their 65ppm  3

The most likely long term outcome of Le Grand Departe in Leeds is very little, other than businesses reflecting on the short term big money they made during the Event and looking for the next cash cow to come along.