School bans kids from bringing their bikes

Health and safety fears lie behind decision slammed by parents and cycling campaigners alike

by Simon_MacMichael   November 18, 2009  

Wodensborough Community Technology College

A West Midlands school has banned children from taking their bicycles onto its grounds due to health and safety fears in a decision that flies in the face of government efforts to get more children cycling.

According to the Daily Mail, Wodensborough Community Technology College in Wednesbury, which lies between Birmingham and Wolverhampton, says that with up to 100 cars and other vehicles arriving through the school gates each day, it is simply too dangerous to allow its 1,000 pupils to use their bikes on site.

Instead, children have to leave their bicycles outside the school grounds, and as a result a number have been stolen, leading parents to fear that their kids will give up cycling.

Talking to the paper, mother-of-three Sarah Braznell, whose 12-year-old son Joe goes to the school, expressed concerns that he would miss out on the exercise he got through cycling, saying: “‘It’s a half-hour return trip to school and back from our house, which really helped to keep Joe fit. But his bike was stolen because the school refuses to let children bring them on site. We bought him a new one but it’s too much of a risk so he misses out on the exercise.”

She added, “The school says it’s dangerous for cyclists in the grounds but by the time they get there they’ve already travelled along roads without a problem. It’s a disgrace.”

The school's headmaster, Ken Ellis, told the Daily Mail: “Reluctantly, on the grounds of health and safety, we have asked students not to bring cycles into school. At the moment, we have one relatively narrow drive into school and several times a day 1,000 students and more than 100 cars, minibuses and taxis use this.”

The newspaper added that the school, which has no parking facilities for bikes – not a problem shared by staff driving their cars there if this aerial view from Multimap is anything to go by – had suggested that children leave their bicycles at the houses of relatives or friends who live close by.

Local councilor Mavis Hughes called the school’s decision “ludicrous,” adding: “It contradicts everything we are for, and it’s health and safety gone too far. Cycling to school is the only exercise some of these children get. Banning them from bringing bikes into school will discourage them from cycling in the first place.”

Debra Rolfe, campaigns co-ordinator for cycling organisation CTC, which in September published a Right to Ride to School leaflet, said that while legally the school had the right to stop children onto its grounds, it should instead be providing training to help children negotiate traffic safely.

“Schools are not legally allowed to ban cycling outright. Nor are they responsible for the independent travel of pupils to and from school. However they can ban pupils from bringing bikes onto their property, as in this case.”

She added: “If the head is worried about his pupils’ safety, he should provide Bikeability training. That way the schoolchildren can learn to cycle safely and confidently on the roads. Banning bikes from school just increases the problem of traffic outside the school.”

As reported on earlier this week, schools in England’s first six Cycling Demonstration Towns that have provided cycle training to their pupils have seen a huge increase in the proportion of children arriving there by bicycle at least a couple of times a week.

The Wednesbury ban echoes the case of Sam O’Shea from Portsmouth, who was told last year that he couldn’t come to school on his bike. Although the school finally relented and said that it would review the decision, that came too late for Sam, who had already moved on to secondary school.

6 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Would I be overly cynical to suggest it has little to do with "health and safety" and more about eliminating a potential source of litigation against the school?

Whatever the reason, it's a ridiculous situation.

posted by johngirvin [5 posts]
18th November 2009 - 10:14

1 Like

that's all that health and safety means these days: removal of any potential short term risk, no matter the long term consequences. this kind of thing makes me very angry: we can't trust the bus drivers and car drivers not to mow you down, so instead of educating them we'll just ban you. FFS. what kind of solution is that?

purplecup's picture

posted by purplecup [233 posts]
18th November 2009 - 10:18

1 Like

Whay are they allowing parents to drive cars through the school gates? This sounds like the source of the problem. As regards litigation, if my son't bike was stolen from outside the school because the school had stopped allowing bicycles inside the premises, I'd sue the school for a replacement.


posted by OldRidgeback [2554 posts]
18th November 2009 - 10:21

1 Like

anyway, the solution is obvious looking at the multimap view: give bikes a lane to use on the pedestrian entrance and right of way on the crossing, then build some bike racks behind the bus stops. it's not rocket science, is it? even if they walk that last bit their bikes are safe. it's got nothing to do with health and safety and everything to do with narrow minded, car-centric thinking

Picture 12.png
purplecup's picture

posted by purplecup [233 posts]
18th November 2009 - 10:28

1 Like

johngirvin wrote:
Would I be overly cynical to suggest it has little to do with "health and safety" and more about eliminating a potential source of litigation against the school?

If it's litigation they are worried about why don't they just ban children from the school altogether - they are completely unpredictable always running around randomly changing direction particularly in school playgrounds, it must be a nightmare for drivers

Spinning on a wheel

Hammy's picture

posted by Hammy [97 posts]
18th November 2009 - 10:36


I would encourage the kids to dismount at the start of the school grounds, and wlk their bikes. Down the road Devil

posted by neslon [51 posts]
20th November 2009 - 19:16