- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Andrew Mitchell (CC licensed image by DFID - UK Department for International Development:Flickr)Leaked 'Plebgate' email claims Andrew Mitchell continually ignored Downing St bicycle rules
Andrew Mitchell, the former government chief whip at the centre of the 2012 'Plebgate' row, is reported to have clashed repeatedly with police officers by insisting on riding his bike through the main gates of Downing Street, rather than using a pedestrian side gate as he was supposed to do.
The claim has been made in a leaked email sent by a police officer to his superiors at 00:46am on 19 September 2012 - the very day of the incident in which Mr Mitchell was alleged to have sworn at officers and called them "plebs," something the Conservative MP for Sutton Coldfield has always denied, although he did admit being "disrespectful."
In the email, a copy of which was obtained by The Times [£], the unnamed officer sought guidance over whether Mr Mitchell should be told to use the pedestrian gate,as stipulated in Downing Street rules regarding safety and security, or whether officers should make an exception for him given his repeated insistence that he should be allowed to ride his bike through the main gate.
The officer wrote: "When he [Mr Mitchell] was initially denied this, he went on to say 'I am the Government Chief Whip and I will be leaving via these gates. I have been in and out of these gates three times today and I will be leaving this way, thank you.'"
Because it was "quite late and quiet" and in order not to create an embarrassing scene, Mr Mitchell was allowed to leave via the main gate on that occasion.
The officer noted: "This rule [to use the pedestrian side gate] was brought in for the safety of the cyclist, officers and tourist/visitors at the front of the street and presumably for the general security of The Street and people in it."
With Mr Mitchell's apparent insistence he should be allowed to break that rule in conflict with the duty of the police officers guarding the gates to enforce it, the officer - with no little prescience, given the way the row would escalate the following day - asked for guidance of what to do.
"Can you please confirm, as I'm sure this will keep happening unless people of much higher rank or of standing in the street/house/government than me have an input, how would you suggest we play this?
"Do we just stand our ground (but have the backing of yourself if something comes of it in the future!) as it was already explained to him that it was for his safety, and for the security of the street, but on this occasion it would most certainly have brought serious repercussions on the officers etc, who decided on this occasiono use their discretion, or do we allow him (only) to use the main gates for his arrivals and departures at all times, as he was adamant he WAS GOING THROUGH THOSE GATES and he's the 'Government Chief Whip!'"
The email concluded: "He may also need to be advised, that for his own safety at least, that he may need to get some lights for his bike if he is going to ride it during hours of darkness!"
It appears that the concerns raised in the police officer's email came too late for a decision to be made prior to the events that evening which made national headlines and led to Mr Mitchell resigning from his cabinet position the following month.
Tendering his resignation to Prime Minister David Cameron, he wrote: "The offending comment and the reason for my apology to the police was my parting remark 'I thought you guys were supposed to f*cking help us.'
"It was obviously wrong of me to use such bad language and I am very sorry about it and grateful to the police officer for accepting my apology."
There was a further twist in December 2012 when it emerged a police constable with the diplomatic protection force had been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in a public office in connection with his report of what had happened at the Downing Street gates on the evening in question, and two days later a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary raised doubts over the police version of events.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe ordered an investigation, and during 2013, eight people, five of them police officers, were arrested and bailed in connection with the incident.
In November, the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which had critcised the findings of an internal Metropolitan Police report into the episde, said it was launching its own investigation and later that month said that five members of the force's diplomatic protection group would face gross misconduct proceedings.
Separately, Metropolitan Police officer Keith Wallis was charged with misconduct in a public office after sending his MP an email in which he claimed to have witnessed the Downing Street incident. Last week, at Westminster Magistrates' Court, he admitted the offence and was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- mitsky 5 min 9 sec ago
- previously loses licence for hitting 12 points...
- Secret_squirrel 20 min 46 sec ago
Cool, battery life looks awesome. Worth noting that longer range is not necessarily a good thing with these radars. They already penetrate...
- Rendel Harris 34 min 43 sec ago
So when you said "all Jews" you didn't actually mean all Jews, just religious ones. However even that distinction is erroneous, as you must surely...
- grasen 1 hour 8 min ago
are you a complete numpty??? it doesn't have disk brakes......
- andystow 1 hour 14 min ago
Isn't that basically what we did to our High Streets & Main Streets in the 1960s?
- Dnnnnnn 1 hour 28 min ago
Almost - but apparently not quite. There are in Northern Ireland.
- john_smith 2 hours 26 min ago
If you'd read it a bit more carefully you'll see that it also requires each new home to have at least three parking spaces. So it shouldn't be a...
- FionaJJ 2 hours 49 min ago
It took me ages to make sense of the story, because the bit about having bike parking is irrelevant to the issue about access. ...
- chrisonabike 3 hours 29 min ago
But how on earth do you expect people to know that's not allowed?...
Add new comment
43 comments
oovaveared. You beat me to the punch about the existence of the gates at Downing Street. Sadly many English folk are clueless to these measures. They consider them as an infringement to their rights as seems to come through from some on this thread. All they can think is why the hell can't a copper just have opened the gate and not been a jobsworth.
Back in Belfast after the Provos tried to blow up the High Court. A blast wall was built resulting in the loss of a traffic traffic lane on two sides of the building. The other two roads were sealed creating a sterile area on the other two. Result. A detour of nearly a mile through the one way system to get to east Belfast from the city centre.
A pain in the arse for all road users including pedestrians. Andrew Mitchell given his past should have know better and not been a pompous ass. The officers involved with the leaks an embarrassment to their force. And for those on duty. Well they were just doing their job. Imagine. I wonder how people here would react if somebody got them to 'bend' the rules in their job?
Stumps the the man is an elected politician who makes the law unlike your colleagues who are scum that think they are above the law. When police think they are better than the lawmakers you have a police state. You comments supporting these lying criminal officers do neither your or your service any credit
Stumps hasn't supported those crooks in any way. Ad hominem attacks are not OK.
Yes he has. Also stumps wrote:
"!He is a small minded buearocrat and a bully (being chief whip requires that in a politician) - as the earlier email proves. But hey dont let the truth get in the way of having a pop at the Police, its never stopped people on here before has it, lol"
If you make Ad hominem attacks then surely you should expect them back.
You quoting him disparaging Mitchell does not equate to him supporting the lying police officers.
What evidence backs up your assertion that he does?
So a senior politician is a pompous ar$e and some police officers are liars. Unfortunately it's not really news
I presume by 'numpty' you are referring to a politician elected by the people and appointed Minister of State by the Prime Minister? Funny how you you get so upset that someone might refer to a policeman as a 'pleb', even when you know they didn't, but you feel it is fine for you to call an elected official a 'numpty'.
Yes, he did use the f-word (once) in conversation with the police but that didn't "start this whole sorry escapade off". It was the two coppers who colluded with each other and completely invented the story of him calling them plebs that actually started it off.
Unless of course, in your little police-world, you think that if someone were to swear at police then the police are fully *entitled* to invent a story to stitch them up __ which is basically what you are inferring. That exactly confirms my suggestion that the police will invent 'evidence' or 'witnesses' in order to exact revenge on whoever they feel wronged by.
Mitchell is just another pompous establishment, I am above petty laws meant for others who was slapped with wet fish and told to squeal deliverance style while being ridden by a fat faux hillbilly from Chelsea when at prep school...... Or, dam was that me?
Prescience or preparatory set-up? I sent in an FoI request for a copy of these "rules" when it first happened and they weren't able to provide one. So do these rules actually exist or are they making them up? An opportunity for a bit of investigative journalism by road.cc?
Only if they lie and get caught! That speaks volumes. Sadly many of the times there never found out!
Agree wholeheartedly. The security industry is a self promoting entity which cannot be challenged. I do not want to live in a country that has a striking resembalance to a West Bank settlement.
I work in the water industry and the many millions being spent on security could have a substantial benefit if spent on the aged infrastructure it's trying to protect.
Grouse over.
Happy and Safe Cycling
Oooooops
Being a huge pretentious prat isn't a crime. What the officers did could be considered a number of crimes and "gross misconduct" and a dismissal/final warning is a favorable outcome for the police officers involved.
Lot's of people might think the critics writing here that 'Mitchell's personality should diminish his right to justice' are also opinionated/judgmental prats. Following their own logic those critics here should feel that it's fair game to fit them up for something they didn't do...
Pages