Bib Shorts or normal shorts???

by King of the Mountains   March 19, 2013  

So, bibs or normal shorts? Or both? I got a few pairs of normal shorts but there starting to go transparent Wink so could probably do with some new 'uns! There for racing on the road and training (budget £70)

32 user comments

Latest 30 commentsNewest firstBest ratedAll

Vermarc stuff on planet-x is very good and cheap at the mo.

http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/c/q/clothing/vermarc

posted by localsurfer [160 posts]
19th March 2013 - 20:01

like this
Like (0)

Bib shorts all the way. You'll get change out of your budget with a pair of dhb aeron pros which are light, comfortable and very well reviewed everywhere. I have four pairs and have never thought about trying anything more expensive.

Ah! Condor

posted by Bedfordshire Clanger [307 posts]
19th March 2013 - 20:49

like this
Like (0)

Shorts all the way. I've cycled hundreds and hundreds of miles and never had a pair not stay in place as if often the comment when people talk about the magical staying power of bib shorts. Maybe I'm the exception rather than the rule, just like my momma told me. Just make sure there's some nice padding down there!

The Human Cyclist A blog. Try it, you might like it...

sm's picture

posted by sm [334 posts]
19th March 2013 - 20:56

like this
Like (0)

I'd say that the cut and the comfort of the pad-bum interface are more important than bib vs waist.

Some people swear by bibs. I have a pair of Shutt VR Club bibs. While the absence of elastic around the waist is nice it's not a deal-breaker for me.

Try Shutt, Lusso or dhb for value (the first two are made in the UK).

Simon E's picture

posted by Simon E [1893 posts]
19th March 2013 - 21:28

like this
Like (1)

Simon E wrote:
I'd say that the cut and the comfort of the pad-bum interface are more important than bib vs waist.

+1
pad-bum-nether regions

The Human Cyclist A blog. Try it, you might like it...

sm's picture

posted by sm [334 posts]
19th March 2013 - 21:45

like this
Like (2)

Bib, bibs, bibs. Even a small belly is kept in order.

Between the S and the LOW

bikeboy76's picture

posted by bikeboy76 [1169 posts]
20th March 2013 - 2:08

like this
Like (0)

bib shorts are normal shorts. At least where cycling is concerned.

Waist-high shorts dig in just where you don't need it, and are totally unsuited to riding in comfort. Honestly, your waist is constantly twisting and flexing as you ride - do you really want an elastic band around it?

(I have a few pairs of each, but prefer bibs).

PJ McNally's picture

posted by PJ McNally [579 posts]
20th March 2013 - 10:12

like this
Like (0)

Whatever you are more comfortable in is the best option, shorts personally. Decent padding and fit is higher up on my choice list.

cidermart's picture

posted by cidermart [456 posts]
20th March 2013 - 11:02

like this
Like (1)

Bibs for me. Mrs Biggins always starts singing "I want to break free" by Queen when I put them on, although I remind her that the first time I wore them she asked whether you wear anything else with bibshorts. I said that you'd generally wear a jersey too Big Grin .

Could be worse I suppose. My friend's wife thinks he looks like Big Daddy with his bibs on Surprise

posted by Sadly Biggins [262 posts]
20th March 2013 - 13:50

like this
Like (1)

Waist shorts for me.
Tried bibs, didn't get on with them.
Don't suffer any discomfort with waist shorts.

posted by bike_food [91 posts]
20th March 2013 - 14:16

like this
Like (5)

Bib's absolutely.

My wife despises them but i would never wear anything else.

posted by stepho [102 posts]
20th March 2013 - 14:49

like this
Like (0)

Sadly Biggins wrote:

Could be worse I suppose. My friend's wife thinks he looks like Big Daddy with his bibs on Surprise

My wife thinks i look like Mick McManus! I don't even have the dodgy looking dyed hair either Crying

posted by SevenHills [143 posts]
20th March 2013 - 14:58

like this
Like (1)

Bib shorts, no question.

I suspect many of the waist shorts wearers haven't spent much time cycling behind others of their persuasion.

Too often they display a gap between jersey and shorts - I've had some very distressing times looking at the top of people's hairy cracks, or trying not to. Surprise

Bib shorts keep the lower back sensibly under lycra.

abudhabiChris's picture

posted by abudhabiChris [496 posts]
20th March 2013 - 17:19

like this
Like (2)

Probably should of said this before (and I know the name doesn't suggest it) but I'm a woman! Dont Tell Anyone (not very subtle, but hey ho)! And am having trouble finding woman's bib shorts! Any suggestions???

I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride my bike
I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride it where I like

King of the Mountains's picture

posted by King of the Mou... [31 posts]
20th March 2013 - 18:11

like this
Like (2)

Don't DHB do womens' stuff?

I swear by my Assos Mille bib shorts, by the way. I know their female advertising is terrible, but their kit is great. Expensive, but there's a factory outlet store online that's good for bargains.

posted by bashthebox [599 posts]
20th March 2013 - 18:20

like this
Like (0)

Yes, DHB do produce women's kit. After all the mockery I got from Mrs Biggins, she has got the bug herself and has got some DHB Vaeon longs which she says are very comfortable. There should be lots of alternatives too. Have a look at (for example) Ribble, Planet X, Wiggle, Sport Pursuit etc

posted by Sadly Biggins [262 posts]
20th March 2013 - 19:20

like this
Like (1)

Definitely bibs!

My first tentative venture into Lycra, like most, was a pair of normal cycling shorts. Eventually I bought a pair of bib shorts deciding that if the pro's wear them exclusively, there must be a reason!

Well the difference in comfort not having that elasticated waist was a revelation and I've never looked back!

For good value check out btwin at decathlon, mine have lasted a couple of seasons so far!

StuayEd's picture

posted by StuayEd [63 posts]
21st March 2013 - 2:14

like this
Like (0)

bashthebox wrote:
Don't DHB do womens' stuff?

I swear by my Assos Mille bib shorts, by the way. I know their female advertising is terrible...

WHAT??? That's the reason I cycle, I know that one day I'll run into Assos Girl. Then we'll spend a sordid summer smashing Faberge Eggs together while Mr Assos is busy standing over his bike on a jetty, glaring at his riding chums. Big Grin

Sq

Squiggle's picture

posted by Squiggle [414 posts]
21st March 2013 - 2:45

like this
Like (1)

BTW bibs without a doubt!

Sq

Squiggle's picture

posted by Squiggle [414 posts]
21st March 2013 - 2:52

like this
Like (1)

Bibs without a shadow of a doubt - I rode for a year in 'normal' shorts and not having the elasticated waist digging in is a god-send. Would never go back to shorts.

posted by andycoventry [108 posts]
21st March 2013 - 9:12

like this
Like (0)

I had been worrying that I was the only person whose wife started making fat wrestler comments whenever he got ready for a ride. Phew. I am in good company.

Edgeley

posted by Edgeley [156 posts]
21st March 2013 - 11:08

like this
Like (1)

I think I'd rather 'fat wrestler' jokes than the current crop of Borat Mankini jokes in my house!

Definitely bibs, but then (sorry, no easy way to say this) I'm not sure how bibs circumnavigate the cleavage on a female?

If I could have, say, 6 bikes, would it stop me drooling over others that I don't have?

posted by notfastenough [2899 posts]
21st March 2013 - 12:27

like this
Like (0)

Squiggle wrote:
bashthebox wrote:
Don't DHB do womens' stuff?

I swear by my Assos Mille bib shorts, by the way. I know their female advertising is terrible...

WHAT??? That's the reason I cycle, I know that one day I'll run into Assos Girl. Then we'll spend a sordid summer smashing Faberge Eggs together while Mr Assos is busy standing over his bike on a jetty, glaring at his riding chums. Big Grin

That's my point. Assos's marketing of it's female range is designed, inexplicably, to appeal to men. You only have to look at the editorial pics for their new jerseys (PVC trousers, high heels, braless, absolutely nothing to do with cycling) to realise that. It's like an FHM photoshoot. Even the product pics for their female bibs are daft - hands barely covering naked boobs.
Now I think the Assos model is incredibly attractive, don't get me wrong, but why is it that the pictures of their female gear, to me, is more appealing than their men's range? Why is their female range being targeted at me? This makes no sense and perpetuates the image of a one sided sport, where men are men and women are podium girls.

posted by bashthebox [599 posts]
21st March 2013 - 13:32

like this
Like (2)

I would have to agree, bashthebox. I went in the new Bike Rooms shop on Deansgate, and there is a massive printed image of that girl on the back wall. It's a striking image, and she's a cracking looker, but I really don't think it would encourage real women to leave out the makeup, grab their kit and work up an unglamourous sweat on a bike.

(Off-topic, I've no idea if anyone has actually bought anything in there, it looks like the most expensive way in town to get on a bike)

If I could have, say, 6 bikes, would it stop me drooling over others that I don't have?

posted by notfastenough [2899 posts]
21st March 2013 - 15:55

like this
Like (2)

notfastenough wrote:

Definitely bibs, but then (sorry, no easy way to say this) I'm not sure how bibs circumnavigate the cleavage on a female?

Thermal underneath??? Surprise

I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride my bike
I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride it where I like

King of the Mountains's picture

posted by King of the Mou... [31 posts]
21st March 2013 - 18:02

like this
Like (2)

King of the Mountains wrote:
notfastenough wrote:

Definitely bibs, but then (sorry, no easy way to say this) I'm not sure how bibs circumnavigate the cleavage on a female?

Thermal underneath??? Surprise

Your emoticon suggests I've offended you, for which I apologise - that was certainly not my intention. What I'm trying to say is that my bibs run up my torso such that I'm unsure how comfortable such clothing could be if I were female. Obviously a base layer/underwear can be used, but that really wasn't my point. Never mind.

Incidentally, sometimes cycling clothing does merit slightly more sensitive discussions - if you disagree just look for some of the threads on seat pads etc. Genuinely no offence meant, but neither is there any point avoiding the question, otherwise we may as well all buy any old shite and not bother sharing experiences of them.

If I could have, say, 6 bikes, would it stop me drooling over others that I don't have?

posted by notfastenough [2899 posts]
21st March 2013 - 18:35

like this
Like (1)

Being longer in body than leg I've found bibs to be inconvenient and uncomfortable at times, but waist shorts do tend to work their way south.

Looking at photos of Eddy Merckx I saw the ideal compromise, Eddy is shown in his hotel room wearing waist shorts with clip on braces attached.

All that is now needed is for the clothing manufacturers to introduce a range of adjustable cycling specific braces and this debate is over Cool

Crosshouses's picture

posted by Crosshouses [168 posts]
21st March 2013 - 23:47

like this
Like (1)

Crosshouses wrote:
All that is now needed is for the clothing manufacturers to introduce a range of adjustable cycling specific braces and this debate is over Cool

They could be called "Rock on Tommy", although this reference might be lost on younger viewers.

posted by Sadly Biggins [262 posts]
22nd March 2013 - 11:15

like this
Like (1)

notfastenough wrote:

Your emoticon suggests I've offended you, for which I apologise - that was certainly not my intention. What I'm trying to say is that my bibs run up my torso such that I'm unsure how comfortable such clothing could be if I were female. Obviously a base layer/underwear can be used, but that really wasn't my point. Never mind.

No offence taken, the emoticon was supposed to be a sort of, 'this is a suggestion, has anytone tried it' than a 'how dare you say that i'm so offended' Smile Maybe a jersey on top would be a better idea though???

I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride my bike
I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride it where I like

King of the Mountains's picture

posted by King of the Mou... [31 posts]
22nd March 2013 - 13:55

like this
Like (1)

Sadly Biggins wrote:
Crosshouses wrote:
All that is now needed is for the clothing manufacturers to introduce a range of adjustable cycling specific braces and this debate is over Cool

They could be called "Rock on Tommy", although this reference might be lost on younger viewers.

I saw them at a club about 30 years ago, funniest live act I've ever seen - hard to believe if you've only seen their abysmal TV shows.

Crosshouses's picture

posted by Crosshouses [168 posts]
22nd March 2013 - 17:00

like this
Like (1)