Prescription cycling specs - Update!


by notfastenough on January 20, 2012 - 14:46

Hi all,
A while ago I posted a topic discussing cycling specs options for people with strong corrective prescriptions. The point was reached where I had found something on the Bolle website about a new product called B-thinactive, but was trying to see them in the flesh.

http://www.bolle-europe.co.uk/technology/prescription/

Anyway, I found an optician with a good relationship with Bolle, and they arranged a meeting between them, the Bolle rep and myself. I went down this morning and we spent an hour rifling through a four-foot tall case full of samples.

Long story short, the B-thinactive thing is amazing. They can get close to -10.0 prescription, so mine at -6.5 plus -1.25 astigmatism is easy. They are still really light as well. Apparently, the innovation isn't the hardware, the clever bit is a software algorithm that engineers the lens by taking the curved blank lens and machining the optics to provide corrective vision for a normal coverage area on the lens, but then tapering down to no prescription on the edges (ie the wraparound bit). It's weird. A standard index lens in my prescription would be 20mm thick at a wraparound edge, which obviously isn't practical. This stuff comes out at 6 or 7mm on the edge for me. You can't see a distorted area on the lens either. (I checked for you Cat1commuter!)

There's a big choice of frames, lenses, colours etc, but I'm looking at the Helix design, which is the white/orange pair on the site referenced above. A high-contrast brown-base lens seemed to work best for me, with either black or grey frames. Polycarbonate with anti-glare, no polarisation or photochromic finish, looking at £254. I'm just waiting on a grey frame sample before ordering.

I still might fancy polarisation, but at an extra £130, it's not just an impulse add-on, so I'm having a think first. Do anyone else have any opinion on the value of polarised lenses?

Sounds good, I'm thankful I don't need a higher prescription yet!

Polarisation is a marmite thing. Works really well, make a big difference if you get only a light shading like Oakley VR30 for example, so much light let through on an average day they work but on a very sunny day you'd appreciate the polar. Polar works on any day there is strong contrasting light like after it rains or sunset/dusk. It's the contrast not light level.

Some hate it though as it hides puddles as they no longer reflect light if you wear polarised lenses. Bit more susceptible to wear and tear though, can scratch easier and need caring for.

posted by Farky [55 posts] 21st January 2012 - 0:15

Thanks for the update. Sounds very promising. I'll visit my optician to see if they'll look at them.

two wheels good; four wheels bad

posted by cat1commuter [1001 posts] 23rd January 2012 - 16:28

My optician does Bollé. They hadn't heard of B-Thin when I visited them on Saturday, but they were very interested. They've been in touch with Bollé today, and can supply.

It's a pity that Bollé can't make the "Draft" model (their most wrap-around) in B-Thin, so I'll be looking at the Helix too.

two wheels good; four wheels bad

posted by cat1commuter [1001 posts] 30th January 2012 - 15:08

Thanks Farky - think ill give polarisation a swerve, since I don't like the sound of invisible puddles hiding invisible potholes! The Bolle chap did concede that if it was his cash, he would just take them as they are, as well.

Good news that cat1 - although based on the sets I tried, I would recommend asking them to get samples in before ordering. So many of them just didn't feel quite right for my head. Indeed, I will be buying a pair that are not the best looking of the choices, in my opinion, simply because they were a good fit. Function over form and all that.

Then again, maybe you have one of those heads that just fits specs!

I love the sound of cleats in the morning

posted by notfastenough [488 posts] 30th January 2012 - 16:03

notfastenough wrote:
Thanks Farky - think ill give polarisation a swerve, since I don't like the sound of invisible puddles hiding invisible potholes! The Bolle chap did concede that if it was his cash, he would just take them as they are, as well.

Just to be clear, polarisation doesn't make what sits beneath the puddle invisible. Polarisation cuts out reflections - meaning that instead of seeing the surface of the puddle because of the light reflected off it, you see through the surface (meaning you can actually see what is below the puddle, if the water is clear enough). It might actually help you see the potholes you're trying to avoid!

posted by step-hent [330 posts] 30th January 2012 - 16:17

Oakley, and Adidas also does prescription lenses..

As of polarisation there is a couple of things to consider:

-People with light eyecolours are more sensetive to reflections (If you have brown eyes, you won't feel the effect of P. lenses as much as people with say, light blue eyes)
- NEVER use P lenses when it might be ice on the road; you can't see it.

Personally I find it more important to have a good dark lens, than having a P. lens. Unless you're planning to use them a lot at sea its not really THAT helpful in my opinion.

The difference between 20£ sunglasses and 100£ is usually in the quality of the optics, and as long as you're in the high end area you should be pretty happy with the optical feel of the product.

Scratch resistance has nothing to do with the polarisation of the lens. That has to do with the type of lens (organic or synthetic) and/or coating og the lens. For example RayBan g17 lenses are actually glass (organic), but most other sunglasses and glasses have synthetic (plastic) lenses, though some come with coatings, such as antireflection, or antiscratch.

I'm not waffling, I worked as a shop assistant in an optician for the last 4 summers Tongue

seabass89's picture

posted by seabass89 [166 posts] 30th January 2012 - 19:33

Thanks Seabass. Think I will be avoiding polarisation for these then.

Various manufacturers do indeed offer prescription lenses, but Bolle are the only ones going higher than -5ish. My choices are Bolle or... Bolle.

I love the sound of cleats in the morning

posted by notfastenough [488 posts] 31st January 2012 - 11:37

notfastenough wrote:
Good news that cat1 - although based on the sets I tried, I would recommend asking them to get samples in before ordering. So many of them just didn't feel quite right for my head. Indeed, I will be buying a pair that are not the best looking of the choices, in my opinion, simply because they were a good fit. Function over form and all that.

Then again, maybe you have one of those heads that just fits specs!

Oh, they're getting samples for me (Helix and Tempest). No way I'd order a £300 pair of glasses without trying the fit!

two wheels good; four wheels bad

posted by cat1commuter [1001 posts] 31st January 2012 - 11:54



Calendar