- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
6 comments
Well a 60 is only 3cm longer and prob only 1cm higher at the headtube? so if you felt tension (cramped?) on a 57 then a 60 might be better. Im 6ft4 and my bike measures 57cm toptube (60cm seattube tho) and i used a 140mm stem!
hm, difficult to say. given that you're quite tall and proportionally your legs aren't that long, given the choice of a 57 or 60, on paper i'd say 60 to give yourself the reach. but if it was 58 or 60 i'd probably say 58
I'm a 59. it's hard being a 59. No-one makes a 59
Thanks Dave and Stato, that sort of goes with what the guy was saying.
Because I've got a long back he was suggesting that the 60 would allow raising the stem if I was uncomfortable, whereas the 57 wouldn't go any higher.
You've put my mind at rest and I'm looking forward to picking the bike up. Just struck me as odd that he didn't use the measuring kit and charge me?
out of interest, what's your:
a) height
b) inseam measurement
?
Dave,
My height is 6'2" and inseam is 33" or 84cm.
Seems a bit odd that they'd charge for something this basic. Did he do any analysis of the length of crank arm, position of your knee relative to the pedals, length of stem, width of bars etc?
It's tricky to comment without actually seeing what he did. Frame size is generally (huge generalisation, but for these purposes bear with me) a description of the length of the seat tube. The fact that you are getting tension in the shoulders might be more to do with the 'reach' of the bike. A 57cm frame with a slightly longer stem might be all you need.
Anecdotally, having chatted with the Garmin-Cervelo team mechanic, I know that the pros often have a frame one size too small so that they can get the aggressive position they favour with a higher seatpost and low handlebars. Not for the average punter though!
Have you actually paid for the 60cm one or are they just getting it in for you to try?
Check out this Leonard Zinn article:
http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/01/bikes-tech/technical-faq-with-len...
That said, getting a proper fitting would usually cost slightly north of £100 and in most shops it is not charged if you buy the bike, so the £40 seems a bit low.
If you are concerned, I'd definitely recommend getting a proper fitting done. Lots of places do them and a quick search on Google - "bike fitting london" (if you live in London) will come up with the top people in the trade there.