Home

Apparently cycling is now cool enough for the kids. Topman has a range of quite skinny clothing called 'Velo' Featuring a lot of summer styles and frenchness and stripes.

email=graememx [at] hotmail.com&geoip=noredirect#pageSize=200&catalogId=33056&viewAllFlag=false&sort_field=Relevance&langId=-1&beginIndex=1&storeId=12555&parent_categoryId=207169&categoryId=991188">http://www.topman.com/en/tmuk/category/clothing-140502/topman-ltd-227456...

Sartorial thoughts gentlemen?

11 comments

Avatar
Beatnik69 [286 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Vests? Goes against Rule #7 unless used in terms of Rule #21 surely?  39

Rules aside, the only one I sort of like is the black/cream L'etape t-shirt and even then I'm not going to fork out £22 for it.

Avatar
Gkam84 [9068 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Well......at least they tried  19 31

Avatar
FerrisBFW [13 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

If it was Rapha it would be £122  3

Avatar
The _Kaner [693 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

I fail to see any cycling connection...
they're certainly not even kool enough for any self respecting hipster fixie rider..

Avatar
Gkam84 [9068 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

The cycling connection is having "L’etape" "Velo" and "France L’etape" printed on them....they is about it

Avatar
farrell [1950 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

I know there has been a few posts about not making negative comments about peoples bodies/shapes on this site, but I'm sensing a slight loop hole here as it's a model on another site, but have a look at state of this:

http://www.topman.com/en/tmuk/product/clothing-140502/topman-ltd-2274563...

Those legs have hardly seen much pedalling have they. Christ, even his Chucks are frigging baggy.

Topshop really haven't thought this through.

Avatar
truffy [653 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Topman. Fashion. Two different sentences and it kinda works.

Avatar
DrJDog [294 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

I like the cardigan

Avatar
Beatnik69 [286 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
farrell wrote:

I know there has been a few posts about not making negative comments about peoples bodies/shapes on this site, but I'm sensing a slight loop hole here as it's a model on another site, but have a look at state of this:

http://www.topman.com/en/tmuk/product/clothing-140502/topman-ltd-2274563...

Those legs have hardly seen much pedalling have they. Christ, even his Chucks are frigging baggy.

Topshop really haven't thought this through.

I don't think his chin has ever seen a razor blade, never mind his legs.  4

Avatar
PJ McNally [589 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes

Hmm, I'm under 30, 175cm and 62kg - so one might conceivably call me young and skinny. (waist 29inches, so vanity sized "28 inch" trousers usually fit).

And I'm no Chris Hoy.

Despite this, I've never found trousers in Topman with *any* room in the crotch, let alone the legs and thighs.

These don't look much different, though I should go see them in person!

Avatar
Leviathan [1784 posts] 1 year ago
0 likes
PJ McNally wrote:

175cm and 62kg... waist 29inches,

I remember, 1991 seems so far away now.

PJ McNally wrote:

Despite this, I've never found trousers in Topman with *any* room in the crotch, let alone the legs and thighs.

Chamois Cream for your jeans?