Overlapping frame sizes - go larger or smaller?

by pipedream72   February 16, 2014  

Hi all....am thinking of buying my first road bike since having a racer about 20 years ago.

Have settled on a Giant defy 1 (alloy) or composite 2 (carbon) but am now trying to decide what size frame to go for. I'm 5ft 11 1/2 inches tall so the Giant size guides suggest I can either go for a medium or medium large frame.

Yesterday I tested a defy 1 in both sizes, riding them both twice on a loop that was about a mile long and included a short hill that I went down, turned around and came back up again.

I'm still not sure which frame to go for though. The medium felt more nimble and went up hill easier, though I'm not sure if I'm just imagining that on the basis that its a bit lighter. Coming downhill though, it felt almost a bit twitchy and I definitely felt a more stable and confident when descending on the medium large frame. But, while the medium large felt more stable, it seemed noticeably heavier going up hill.

In terms of riding position, I didn't really prefer one over the other. It might be worth mentioning that I had a spine op on two slipped discs a few years back and struggle with my lower back if hunched over, so I'm maybe thinking that the medium frame would be better for me as it'll promote a more upright position.

If I was simply saying which I felt more comfortable on, it would be the medium large by a whisker, just because if felt more solid, but I'm wondering if that's maybe just down to the fact that I haven't really ridden a bike for 20 years and would I maybe get used to the more nimble (but slightly twitchy) medium frame?

Also, I haven't managed to test the composite 2 yet but am wondering whether I'm likely to experience the same thoughts or is the carbon frame likely to give me a significantly different feeling?

Thanks for any advice.

Cheers,

Steve

13 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Personally I would always say go for the smaller size as you can always raise the seat height or get a longer stem etc. It is often more difficult to do the opposite if you have already set to minimum settings.

However, deep down you need to go with what felt most comfortable, especially taking into account your surgery. Friends have bad backs and they find smaller bikes uncomfortable as the seat is often quite a bit higher than the handle bars.

I don't really feel I have answered your question, but if it was me I would 'size down'..but you need to take into account your own circumstances and what feels right.

2014 Ride100 London Sportive
http://www.justgiving.com/Sponsor-Tim

posted by Tinternet_tim [78 posts]
16th February 2014 - 20:53

like this
Like (104)

When I test rode my current bike (a 46 compared to my previous 52, slightly shorter TT length 1.5 cm but also just different manufacturer sizing as Pinarello do their measurements differently than Kestrel) it felt twitchy and skittish at first, especially over cobblestone. On the second test ride and descents I realized it was just really responsive compared to what I'd been used to. I could lean hard into it and pop right back up to stay on a straight line vs my Kestrel where once I leaned over at the same angle it pretty much committed me to making a turn. Also, a bigger frame has a longer wheelbase which can give you a more stable feeling on descents which may be the sensation you were experiencing with the M/L frame. I would do a couple more test rides on both (your LBS shouldn't give you flack for wanting to feel comfortable with deciding between the two) and see if the twitchiness you feel levels off as you get used to a more responsive M frame or that you're more comfortable with the slow climbing, more stable descending M/L frame.

Melancholy is incompatible with bicycling. ~James E. Starrs

movingtarget's picture

posted by movingtarget [134 posts]
16th February 2014 - 21:51

like this
Like (100)

I'm slightly taller than you, have an inside leg 36" arm reach 24" & have the Defy, bought it last June
I tried both medium & the medium/large frame
Although the medium was better for me in terms of reach - Top tube length, I had to put the seat post right up & the bars were too low.
So I opted for M/L.
After a few attempts to get the reach right, I had a bike fit done this month, which resulted in only a few minors tweaks being made - The bars tilted up slightly & saddle moved forward to get the correct reach.

I would recommend getting a proper fitting done, the comparing it to the actual bike
Smile

I'm only here for the cake

Dizzy's picture

posted by Dizzy [61 posts]
16th February 2014 - 22:17

like this
Like (101)

I'd go for the smaller one every time - stiffer, lighter. Can always put a slightly longer stem on if you find you're too scrunched up.

Boardman CX Team '14 | Cannondale CAAD8 '12 (written off, SMIDSY) | Scott Sportster '08

Gizmo_'s picture

posted by Gizmo_ [826 posts]
16th February 2014 - 22:59

like this
Like (103)

Right....cheers for the advice folks, sounds like the medium is probably the best way forward. I'll give them another test just to satisfy myself and then get my order in.

Thanks again...

Steve.

posted by pipedream72 [2 posts]
17th February 2014 - 19:58

like this
Like (102)

At the risk of confusing matters, I'm about 5'10", but I have a long ish back and short ish limbs (inside leg 30"). I went for the m/l for my defy, in Oct 2012. I've ridden it for a few thousand miles, including London to Paris in 2 days (86 miles day 1, 136 day 2). I've had no trouble at all, and love riding it. I'd go with the comfortable one

posted by Stratman [36 posts]
17th February 2014 - 22:54

like this
Like (101)

If you cannot be @rsed to go and get a proper fit Big Grin , then at least give www.competivecyclist.com a go and do theirs. You'll need someone to measure you up. On the face of it, I'd reckon you'd need M/L but as you say, only just so. I'm 5ft 10 1/2 and would be on the medium - just. Having too long a stem can make the steering suffer and being too low can make your back suffer. 20 mins rechecking some details on there could be worth it.

posted by bikerdavecycling [71 posts]
18th February 2014 - 0:30

like this
Like (101)

I am 5'11" aand went to Giant shop to be measured, then to test ride a bike. I ended up with a M/L Giant TCR Advanced. I later changed the stem from 100mm to 80mm. I am now very happy with the fit.

posted by Sensible [60 posts]
21st February 2014 - 23:48

like this
Like (70)

I'm the opposite. 5'11" and would take the medium every time. I find the m/l slightly out of proportion and can't make the adjustments necessary to make it just so. With a medium, a few tweets and I'm sorted Smile

Damn it man......pedal faster!!

pups110's picture

posted by pups110 [66 posts]
22nd February 2014 - 0:56

like this
Like (69)

+1 for the Competitive Cyclist fit calculator - millimetre perfect for me.

Remember, top tube effective length is the most important measurement and the hardest to change.

posted by drmatthewhardy [305 posts]
22nd February 2014 - 10:01

like this
Like (67)

5' 11" 1/2 here too and am a definite M/L in Giant sizing. As for the medium feeling faster uphill, you must be incredibly in tune to be able to tell the difference. You must feel lightning after having a piss.

posted by ajmarshal1 [271 posts]
22nd February 2014 - 17:41

like this
Like (66)

You may not want to hear it, but I would look at other bikes as well, from what you're saying you are unsure, from my experience when I have tried bikes. I have a positive "this is the one feeling" you don't want to end up with bike that could end up left in the shed or being sold because you find it uncomfortable on rides. A decent bike shop should fit you up. my lbs did a bike fit on all my three choices. See if they will do both and see which/if either fits properly.

posted by Shep73 [137 posts]
22nd February 2014 - 21:35

like this
Like (65)

@sensible

80mm stem on a modern road bike is a touch too short - it can work, but it also tends to make the front end too light whether climbing, or more importantly when descending as it makes it harder to weight the front wheel for grip, you can also find yourself snagging your shorts on your saddle tip when moving from seated to standing!

90mm is probably the minimum length stem to put onto a road bike, if you need to go shorter to get the reach correct (observing proper saddle position setup so as to not compromise pedalling efficiency) then its likely the frame is too long / large for you

experienced fitters would always recommend getting the smallest frame that "fits" you as it lets you lengthen or shorten the bike fit to suit your needs

buying a bike that is one size too large, generally means you are having to shorten the bike fit to get it right, and can end up with compromised handling or even long-term problems with bike fit leading to injuries

I am 5'10" with 32" inseam and long arms and found a 56cm allez too long (after purchase) so sold it on, then got a 54cm tarmac (same geometry as allez) and its just a little long but ok with 90mm stem, I could easily ride a 52cm tarmac with 100-110 stem and ideal fit.

I've had 2 Specialized Body Geometry "fits" on the Allez and Tarmac and have played with setup including multiple stem lengths / stack height and pushing the limits of the saddle / cleat setup to address reach distance

posted by hampstead_bandit [130 posts]
22nd February 2014 - 21:57

like this
Like (67)