'Disc brakes will take over' - the man from TRP tells us why

We visit Tektro/TRP in Taiwan and Marketing Director Lance Larrabee tells us why disc brakes are set to dominate across all sectors of cycling…

by Mat Brett   May 29, 2013  

Tektro have over 160 CNC machines working 24/7. They produce 20,000 road caliper brakes a month – nearly quarter of a million per year. And that’s nothing compared to the number of hydraulic disc brakes they make: 2.2 million per year. In short, they know a thing or two about brakes, so when the Marketing Director of TRP, Tektro’s high-end division, says that disc brakes are going to take over in every sector of cycling in the next few years, you have to take it seriously.

Of course, it’s in TRP’s interest to big up disc brakes – they make them. But they also make lots of caliper brakes so they’ll sell plenty of units whatever happens in the market.

Plus, you don’t have to take TRP’s word for it. SRAM have already announced new road disc brakes and there are strong rumours that other major manufacturers will be launching their own models very soon. A massive shift is certainly taking place.

The Tektro brand has been around for 27 years and employs 1,400 people. I’ve come to visit their manufacturing facility outside of Taichung in Taiwan, where they’ve been for the past four years. Everything is milled in here, they have a forging plant next door, and the carbon fibre parts are created at their older factory five miles up the road.

I won’t go too deeply into the manufacturing process but there’s some seriously powerful machinery here it. This is a 400 tonne press, for example. To put that in perspective, a Volkswagen Golf weighs about 1.5 tonnes. You wouldn’t want to get your fingers caught in there. In goes a solid lump of metal, out comes a section of brake.

The impression you get wandering around here is that Tektro take their testing and quality control very, very seriously indeed. Brakes are tested individually before they go out. The testing is done on machines, 300 cycles per brake, then they’re pressure tested for 400 seconds. If the brake passes, it’s held for 36 hours and then pressure tested again. This isn’t just done on sample brakes but on every single one before it leaves the factory.

As I said, TRP is the high-end division of Tektro, the initials originally standing for Tektro Racing Products – although the name is now just TRP. Essentially, Tektro products tend to be mass market while TRP are more exclusive, high-performance components. We’ve shown you TRP’s new Spyre and HyRd disc brakes recently, along with the Hylex hydraulic road/CX brake

We spoke to Lance Larrabee, TRP’s Marketing Director, about both the brand and the future of braking. As you can’t fail to have noticed, big things are happening in road bike braking right now and Lance reckons this is just the start…

 

road.cc: Tell us about TRP's track record in developing brake technology?

Lance Larrabee: In cyclocross and time trialling, we’re the number one. We invented the direct mount brake. Working with Specialized, we mounted brakes directly on pivots rather than with a centre bolt mount, and Shimano have followed us.

We had this idea for a V-brake that goes directly behind the fork. When everybody was worried about the 3:1 rule for the airfoil shapes [the UCI rule stating that the depth of the tube can’t be more than three times greater than the width], we thought we could extend the airfoil shape by making the brake part of that fork blade, so the TRP TTV brake goes directly behind the fork blade and creates the trailing edge of the airfoil shape. Giant are using that on their Propel aero road bike now, Argon 18 have been equally successful with it and so have Colnago, Wilier… more and more people.

Our lightweight magnesium brakes have been used on the highest level Cannondale Ultimates and Specialized Tarmac SLs.

 

Are disc brakes for road bikes really going to be the next big thing?

We feel like we’re the industry leaders in niche areas and if the biggest revolution coming in cycling is disc brakes for the road, we want to be at the forefront of that.

We know from motorsports that disc brakes are faster and we know that in Formula One, with those carbon fibre rotors, the drivers can leave their braking until later and reduce their lap times. Imagine if Nibali can dive into a corner and brake later on a descent, if he can get away by 30secs. If big brands are behind disc brakes for road, then the UCI can’t deny it.

I think it’s sensible not to just throw the gates open yet [disc brakes are not yet legal in UCI-sanctioned road racing], but every major bike manufacturer has a disc brake road bike coming

 

What about hydraulic rim brakes? Do you see them making much of an impact on the market?

Well, people who tested the SRAM version at Sea Otter said that it wasn’t great [we did a First Ride last month]. We’re looking at it – we have a design in the works – but at the same time we feel, why go halfway?

 

What do you think about cable systems versus hydraulic set-ups?

A hydraulic system has more power ultimately, and better modulation whereas a mechanical system is a bit lighter. The current TRP HyRd system [a mechanical interface hydraulic disc brake] is within 5g of the weight of an Avid BB7 [cable operated disc brake].

 

The Spyre, the two piston mechanical brake is 40g lighter than a BB7, it is 20mm narrower with 20% more power, so it’s for the person who wants light weight.

A standard Shimano Dura-Ace road caliper weighs about 135g and the Spyre is 140g, so you’re only really adding the weight of the rotor. We think that for simplicity and weight that might be really good, but I tend to prefer the power and modulation of hydraulic, and it feels really good in your hand. It feels like a well setup road caliper.

And whereas SRAM systems are super-expensive – they’ll be on $10,000 bikes – the HyRd can be positioned on an Ultegra-level bike at $1,500 and it’ll work with any current shift lever available.

 

What about rotor size?

Heat is not a big issue for us but we think you need a bigger rotor just for the extra leverage. We recommend a 160mm for the road. I think 140mm is fine for cyclocross.

 

Whenever we talk about disc brakes for road bikes, people on the road.cc forum always say that the limiting factor at the moment with existing caliper brakes isn’t the braking power, it’s getting the tyre to stop on the ground. What do you say to that?

I’d invite you to use the brake and make your own conclusion. It’s not a question of locking up the wheel all the time; what you want is power and control and that’s what you get here.

Normally, to pull up at a stop sign you’ll use about 3kg of lever force. It takes 6kg of lever force to clamp the brake tight so there’s a lot of room in there to feather the brake. It’s not like it’s on/off. There are armchair engineers who imagine what it’s like but they should use them and see.

 

Will discs eventually expand into every sector of cycling or are there areas where rim brakes will always remain dominant?

I don’t see why they shouldn’t go everywhere.

My first bike had a 5-speed freewheel and I made it into a 6-speed. People asked me what I wanted that for and thought it was stupid – but now we have 11-speed. I think it’ll be similar with disc brakes. Riding a disc brake bike on a descent gives you more control and is more fun than riding a caliper brake bike.

 

When it comes to developing disc brakes for the road, is it a question of developing existing mountain bike technology or starting with a clean sheet of paper?

It’s a little of both. We started with a basic mountain bike design but we’ve developed it for the road. The Hy/Rd’s composite pistons, weren’t used in mountain bike brakes, and we’ve had to think about the leverage ratios for road levers and things like that. Plus, a brake for the road has to look like a road product and not like a mountain bike product.

 

So, where do you see road bike braking heading next?

Well, we’re waiting for all this to shake out now. Then I think thru-axle designs [where the dropout is closed at the bottom as you’ll find on many mountain bikes] will come to the road. The danger with carbon dropouts is that you can remove a little material from the dropout with very heavy braking.

In road racing, you can’t file off the lawyer tabs [the tabs on the end of the fork dropouts that stop the wheel falling out even if you forget to tighten the quick release skewer] anymore, so to do a wheel change you have to unwind the skewer. It’s not that much more difficult to slide a thru-axle in and out to change a wheel.

 

For more info on TRP visit www.trpbrakes.com. The Tektro website is www.tektro.com. The UK distributor for both is www.upgradebikes.co.uk.

 

54 user comments

Latest 30 commentsNewest firstBest ratedAll

I'm not convinced road disks actually solve any problems for me and I still haven't seen potential problems (eg dragging rotors) addressed. In this interview the market speak starts almost immediately "We know from motorsports that disc brakes are faster" faster than what exactly?.
"with those carbon fibre rotors, the drivers can leave their braking until later and reduce their lap times" thats nice, are you planning to fit carbon rotors to bicycles?
"Imagine if Nibali can dive into a corner and brake later on a descent, if he can get away by 30secs" Have you done testing to confirm this?
I'm not saying disk brakes are neccessarily a bad thing, but this knid of market speak does nothing to convince of anything other than this is just a marketing exercise to make more money. Please, feel free to prove me wrong with some actual relevant facts.

posted by imaca [39 posts]
30th May 2013 - 1:35

like this
Like (0)

Bloody hell someone's not getting any. Big Grin

posted by fluided [4 posts]
30th May 2013 - 7:35

like this
Like (11)

Yennings wrote:
Ultimately I suspect it will have nothing to do with stopping power. Disc brakes are bound to proliferate because they'll enable Shimano to sell a whole new generation of groupsets, Specialized to sell a whole new generation of frames and Mavic to sell a whole new generation of wheelsets. The combined marketing might of the cycle sector will overcome such petty considerations as whether discs work any better (which personally I think they do anyway).

^^^

This is the only real reason. Aren't you (royal 'you') already starting to feel anxious that your road bike set-up won't mirror that of the pros?

Ghedebrav's picture

posted by Ghedebrav [824 posts]
30th May 2013 - 8:07

like this
Like (13)

I have mixed views on this one. My MTB has Hope hydro brakes and I much prefer the feel and confidence I have in their stopping ability over the tradition road set-up. But how much "innovations" like this and electronic shifting are about genuine improvements v manufacturers just getting us to buy more bikes remains to be seen. I think we should all laugh at ourselves a bit on this front - be honest before electronic shifting how many of you were so frustrated by the huge effort of gear changing that you longed for a solution to stop your fingers aching! This ends up being more about have the latest and greatest rather than tranforming our riding experience. And you know what I'm cool with that.

posted by Fipzee [4 posts]
30th May 2013 - 8:20

like this
Like (10)

Fipzee wrote:
I have mixed views on this one. My MTB has Hope hydro brakes and I much prefer the feel and confidence I have in their stopping ability over the tradition road set-up. But how much "innovations" like this and electronic shifting are about genuine improvements v manufacturers just getting us to buy more bikes remains to be seen. I think we should all laugh at ourselves a bit on this front - be honest before electronic shifting how many of you were so frustrated by the huge effort of gear changing that you longed for a solution to stop your fingers aching! This ends up being more about have the latest and greatest rather than tranforming our riding experience. And you know what I'm cool with that.

You don't have to buy them if you don't want to. I would think the main considerations would be sorted when they release these to the pros, but just remember, you current calliper breaks work perfectly well, it is not going anywhere you are not!

Jeez, you'd think it was getting the latest update/patch for a piece of software.

posted by Colin Peyresourde [978 posts]
30th May 2013 - 8:50

like this
Like (10)

Quote:
to balance, went out on the MTB a few weeks back and it was very wet to say the least, the disc brakes, XTR on aligator rotors were shockingly bad!!! just nothing at all!!!!!

apply brakes, nothing, no slowing, eventually they started to bite but it took seconds, far worse than the calipers on the road bike.

If your hydro disc brakes are 'far worse' than the calipers on the road bike then there is a serious problem with the disc brakes.

Been riding mountain bikes from cantis through v-brake to disc brakes and all have been a significant step up in performance. To say otherwise is absolute nonsense IMO.

posted by Lifer [15 posts]
30th May 2013 - 9:05

like this
Like (13)

Are dragging rotors a problem? Can't say I've ever experienced it on the mountain bike which gets bashed about a hell of a lot more than the road bike!

I really don't understand why people are so reticent about disc brakes there is no downside IMO.

posted by Lifer [15 posts]
30th May 2013 - 9:17

like this
Like (16)

I really don't get this disk brake thing.

As I see it on a road bike your braking is limited not by the rim brake but by the contact area with the road surface.

Even with rim brakes you can lock up your wheels anyway. Surely with disk brakes you'll just be locking up sooner/easier?

I understand they'll be a help in wet weather seeing as you won't be relying on a thin strip of aluminium to stop you dying.

Am I missing any glaringly obvious advantage of disk brakes over rim in dry weather?

Violence is not the answer, but it will do until we find out what is.

posted by TheHound [32 posts]
30th May 2013 - 9:28

like this
Like (12)

In my experience (and i've not tried them on a road bike) it's easier to control disc brakes, eg you can scrub off speed without locking up easier than you can with cantis, maybe because the pistons are moving a tiny amount in relation to lever travel compared to cantis?

posted by Lifer [15 posts]
30th May 2013 - 9:49

like this
Like (12)

@lifer, the only real improvement discs have brought is they work in mud, v brakes and cantis always caught the twigs and mud and helped bring the bike to a stop. As i mentioned i started with 200gs plastic cantis which were **** with 4 finger plastic levers!!!! that flexed and bent but didn't actually do anything helpful. Moved through XT2, various dia-compes, shimano lo-pros, v brakes, Avids, etc. then on to HS33's and finally Avid and Shimano Disc brakes.

As for the performance of my current disc brakes, great in the dry but appalling in the wet. I suspect the lack of metal in the very light rotors may be an issue here. The Centaur calipers on the road bike just work more consistently.

End of the day we will all be on discs soon, that will be what is made.

mrmo's picture

posted by mrmo [868 posts]
30th May 2013 - 10:03

like this
Like (9)

as for the dragging rotors, plenty of times they rub, ping, etc. more annoying is swapping wheels. It can be a faff, far more so than callipers.

mrmo's picture

posted by mrmo [868 posts]
30th May 2013 - 10:17

like this
Like (12)

Am I the only person who objects to disc brakes purely on looks?

Then again, I have single pivots...

posted by hoski [61 posts]
30th May 2013 - 10:22

like this
Like (8)

Something that no-one has mentioned so far, what about the risk of the fork flexing during braking. A friend of mine (not an experienced cyclist at the time) bought a Cannondale Bad boy (700c wheels & cable disks) and asked me to look at his bike as it sounded as if his headset was loose, I looked at it and found that the problem was the fork flexing, not a headset issue. I suppose with a rigid fork and the inertia during braking now nearer the hub had caused it, my only experience with disks is with a mountain bike I once owned years ago, but the front suspension absorbed this momentum. Therefore will roadbike forks need to be 'beefed' up to compensate? (around the headtube & fork crown junction).

posted by Darren C [68 posts]
30th May 2013 - 11:06

like this
Like (10)

I'm a bit surprised people are still so anti from a performance point of view. Work better in the wet, save your rims, very low maintenance, better modulation- what's not to like?

Of course manufacturers want to sell us stuff, but the next great thing coming onto the market doesn't mean you have to bin what youy have now- nobody's making you do anything and there'll be rim brakes and parts available for decades yet I reckon.
I can't see myself replacing my road bike for a good few years yet, but when it's time I expect the new one will have discs- which by then will be a few generations in with price and performance dialled in nicely. All good.

posted by Chuck [300 posts]
30th May 2013 - 11:07

like this
Like (11)

I've had a varity of hydro discs on my mtbs for years now, presently got Hope M4s on one and Shimano XTs on the other. They're brilliant.

In time past I've worn through the braking surface of wheel rims, and when they split, they go with a bang!
So my latest road bike has disc too. Its technically a 'cross bike, but who's counting? Shimano R505 callipers, with 140mm Ashima airrotors on a wheelset I built myself.

They just work. Dead easy to scrub off speed without locking up, especially handy in the wet.

And for the people who say they don't look as good, my wheels have black hubs, black spokes, black nipple and black rims with no machined surface so they look brilliant.

I'll be riding it at the LEL in a couple of months, feel free to have a look...

I really don't mind if people wnat to stick to rim brakes, I know they are really very good. What I don't like is the naysayers and doom-mongers who seem to be offended that other people may ride bikes a little differently.

posted by ir_bandito [58 posts]
30th May 2013 - 12:45

like this
Like (10)

I just don't understand why some people don't get it, disc brakes are far more controllable than rim, they don't suffer performance issues like rim brakes and are easier to modulate, so basically they are better and safer, as brakes are the main mechanical part of the bike that stops us and keeps us safe (as opposed to our observation, anticipation and general awareness of what's coming up and around us) I see this as a no brainer, why would you not want to be safer ?

posted by mikeprytherch [175 posts]
30th May 2013 - 13:01

like this
Like (11)

Pros of discs:

- no rim wear
- lighter rims available
- larger tyres are no problem
- mudguards are no problem
- no brake filth covering the whole bike
- no loss of braking in the wet
- less force required at the lever
- no need to loosen off the brake if you break a spoke

Pros of discs over cantis:

- no fouling crown-mounted lights
- no loss of power with pad wear
- easy to set up

Cons of discs:

- need the fork to be meatier and preferably have differently-angled dropouts or another anti-ejection feature (eg right-hand mount or through-axle)
- can't use radial spoking

I'd be fine with caliper brakes if I only ever rode in the dry on good tarmac, but that's not reality, so the case is pretty well stacked on one side IMO Smile

Bez's picture

posted by Bez [336 posts]
30th May 2013 - 13:15

like this
Like (14)

Welsh boy wrote:
"This press, for example, applies 400 tonnes of pressure". The tonne is NOT the unit of pressure, when are these lazy/ignorant journalists going to learn?

Think they may be refering to a forge press .... as they
say in goes metal out comes brake parts !!

Me personally .... love the discs on the mtb, so when the
road bike gets replaced and discs are the only option so
be it Smile

still on the 3rd switch-back of Bwlch !

posted by therevokid [592 posts]
30th May 2013 - 13:33

like this
Like (13)

I cant believe we got so many comments in before Bez highlighted the advantage of lighter and stronger rims.
For a sport obsessed with component weight, taking that fat braking surface away from the main rotational weight to sacrifice it for a much smaller hub focused weight would seem to be a huge advantage to me?
But then i've only just got into road and been on the mtb for 10 years where mud and wet make disks the only real choice.

posted by Fresherjohn [1 posts]
30th May 2013 - 14:19

like this
Like (11)

BBB wrote:
Let's be realistic here. A typical rider...doesn't cycle in the rain (regularly)

Sorry? Do you actually live in the UK? I can count on my fingers the number of dry rides I've had this year!

Quote:
It’s not that much more difficult to slide a thru-axle in and out to change a wheel.

Roastie wrote:
Interesting thought about thru-axles. It looks like quite a faff - perhaps someone might invent a new road QR/thru-axle type system that is more disc brake friendly?
I actually think this may be faster than getting a qr beyond lawyer tabs, especially using something akin to the RockShox Maxle lite 360; I'm pretty sure i can take the front wheel off a mtb faster than i can a road bike with lawyer tabs in place.

posted by mustard [72 posts]
30th May 2013 - 16:08

like this
Like (12)

Quote:

Pros of discs:

- mudguards are no problem

Depending on how well thought out the the dropout area is to fit the stays. You might have to do something like this:

DSC_0695

posted by ir_bandito [58 posts]
30th May 2013 - 16:48

like this
Like (10)

Quote:
Pros of discs:

Quote:
- no rim wear

granted
Quote:
- lighter rims available

maybe, but as a rim still has to be able to hold a tyre at 150psi not sure how much weight in the real world
Quote:
- larger tyres are no problem

frame design not calipers in my experience
Quote:
- mudguards are no problem

frame design, how close the crown and seat tube are to the tyre, brakes are largely irrelevant
Quote:
- no brake filth covering the whole bike

you obviously haven't seen the grey crap over my mtb from the brake pads
Quote:
- no loss of braking in the wet

see my earlier comment, there can be severe braking loss in heavy rain. remember the days when cheap bikes came with steel wheels?
Quote:
- less force required at the lever

design issue
Quote:
- no need to loosen off the brake if you break a spoke

and if you bend a rotor or have one warp? it happens

Quote:

Pros of discs over cantis:

- no fouling crown-mounted lights


is it really a problem with well design lights?
Quote:
- no loss of power with pad wear

try some cheap pads, far to thick and constant rubbing until they are half worn.
Quote:
- easy to set up

seen how many how to bleed brakes threads on the internet?

not anti discs but they aren't really a major advance.

mrmo's picture

posted by mrmo [868 posts]
30th May 2013 - 17:39

like this
Like (15)

mustard wrote:
BBB wrote:
Let's be realistic here. A typical rider...doesn't cycle in the rain (regularly)

Sorry? Do you actually live in the UK? I can count on my fingers the number of dry rides I've had this year!

Yes I live in the UK (South) and I commute every single week day.
I can count on my fingers the number of cyclists riding in the rain.

I don't follow trends. Trends follow me.

posted by BBB [167 posts]
31st May 2013 - 3:13

like this
Like (9)

Soft Southern Shandies.

That is all.

Cake?

posted by 515 [16 posts]
31st May 2013 - 21:43

like this
Like (9)

What hasn't been mentioned is heat (because basically all that brakes do is convert energy into heat). Whilst the heat from braking is

I have heard of riders overheating their wheels on a descent and puncturing (which is why you should never inflate your tyres to the maximum figure written on them). I've never heard of anyone buckle a wheel rim due to heat.

In the case of discs the area to absorb heat is much smaller - there must come a point where the heat from braking buckles the disc. At this point your bicycle is useless. For that reason I think the UCI are as likely to adopt disc brakes as they are to allow recumbents. I have been wrong before though!

If cycling is indeed a sport of self-abuse why aren't more cyclists sectioned under the mental health act?

posted by hairyairey [275 posts]
31st May 2013 - 23:39

like this
Like (14)

someone in the middle of a bunch with way more powerful brakes is going to cause a crash...how on earth do they get round that little one??

If you slam on your brakes in a peloton then you're going to cause a big crash regardless of what brake type you have.

posted by kie7077 [359 posts]
1st June 2013 - 10:07

like this
Like (11)

Quote:
Interesting thought about thru-axles. It looks like quite a faff - perhaps someone might invent a new road QR/thru-axle type system that is more disc brake friendly?

A bit like what DT Swiss have been doing for years?

posted by juan [11 posts]
2nd June 2013 - 9:52

like this
Like (8)

The real problem here is going to be standardisation.

We are all going to have discs whether we want them or not, as the marketing machine is already behind them - you'll note it was a marketing guy with little or no appreciation of mechanics who gave the spiel (TRP invented direct mount? I don't think so ... think of all those sidepulls we brazed to fork crowns in the 1980s, or the number of cantis / V-Brakes whose bosses are brazed to forks / frames etc., BMX brakes under the BB and so on, and so on ...).

But we are in an industry that has gone from basically three specifications of headset to 47 (go on, count them all) in 10 years, we have BB "standards" which are anything but, and multiplying like rabbits (and none of them work in a really satisfactory fashion) - what hope do we think there is for standardisation of rotor size, rotor mounting, hub width?

For pro racing we are going to go from neutral service having to carry four different rears and one front to (even if they standardise rotor size and wheel fixing) eight rears and two fronts until *everyone* is on discs - and pity the poor retailer - this will represent, at least during that transitional phase, an effective doubling of wheel stock-holding.

There is no avoiding any of this but I sure ain't looking forward to it ...

This week I have mostly been riding a Mondiale in Deda V107 with Campagnolo Super Record 11 ...

posted by velotech_cycling [72 posts]
2nd June 2013 - 23:41

like this
Like (11)

Nicely written! I liked the line about how you wouldn't want to get your fingers caught in the 400 ton press. Good work!

posted by vbvb [169 posts]
4th June 2013 - 3:55

like this
Like (9)

I've run mechanical discs on two 'road' bikes now. I had a steel framed Pompetamine with BB7s and found the disc brakes were very good in the wet and especially when I was lugging over 20kgs of luggage in my panniers.
I'm currently running BB5s on a cross/commuter bike and (strangely) these seem even better than the BB7s. I've also dug out some very old deep section carbon wheels and had them rebuilt onto decent MTB hubs and the bike just flies! I do think top dual pivot brakes are very good but rim braking on carbon rims has always been a bit pants. It feels terrific to bowl along with fast wheels and be able to stop properly (and quietly) too. It really has put a new lease of life into the wheels.
I don't race anymore but I can see there are still issues into going to discs. Disc systems are still a little too heavy (right now) as picking up my converted wheels will testify. I'm not sure non-radial (on one side) is too much of an issue but as the previous poster says, standardisation definitely will be. But they do make a lot of sense for non-racists (as my wife says!).
Oh, if forks are flexing that is due to poorly designed/manufactured forks - I certainly don't have that issue. I too had to customise my mudguards to fit around my discs.

posted by BikeJon [33 posts]
23rd September 2013 - 17:15

like this
Like (12)