• Sahara Dust Cloud - Avoid!1 year 7 weeks agoIts definitely a bit snoggy

    Its definitely a bit snoggy in Manchester, but if the Boat Race crews are out training I think you will survive. Looks like it will clear tomorrow anyway.

  • Hard Acceleration away from cyclists - increase in how many times this happens1 year 7 weeks agoI do this every morning now

    I do this every morning now when I overtake all the newbie bikers on the road to work, though my rear end doesn't give off many emissions.

    There are a lot of white Audis and Beemers round my way, Cheshire Polar Bears I call them. Best given a wide berth.

  • Sahara Dust Cloud - Avoid!1 year 7 weeks agoJust been out for a tempo run

    Just been out for a tempo run and no problems with breathing - just felt humid.

  • Deep Breath Everyone1 year 7 weeks agoI've been giving this some

    Waiting I've been giving this some serious thought... I think the only way to right this situation is to allow the deadline for the next race to run over by exactly one hour. Right now the deadline for the Tour of Flanders reads' Deadline in: 02d 15h 49m.' The right thing to do is to let the race start, let a breakaway get established and let everyone, including and, obviously, especially (!), northie, of course, to select the established breakaway for their team.

    However (!) Big Grin Road.cc should block! Big Grin I say block (!) the accounts of those who had the 'gall' to 'sneakily' and 'criminally' exploit the server clock error, namely Gkam, Ray and Wig Billy, and any other 'offenders' that can be confirmed in the next 02d 15h 49m to prevent them from making changes to their accounts after (!) the race has started.

    If you think about it, it's the only fair thing to do. Those of us who don't care will play the game without tampering with our selections because we see it fit to play that way Big Grin

    Those who want to play the game by selecting the breakaway will have a chance to do so and 'undo' the damage inflicted on them in the previous competition and 'repay' the 'perpetrators' with a dose of their own medicine! Big Grin That (!) is Justice (!) with a capital 'J'! I say (!) Big Grin

    You see, northie, what went wrong was not that they got the points, and you didn't (!) it was the fact that they got the opportunity to 'cheat', to play with knowledge of the breakaway, a knowledge that was not intended to be had because the race deadline is supposed to be before the race starts, and they took it (!). So I propose you (!) get the same opportunity, too! Big Grin To make things right for you! Smile

    On the other hand, maybe Dave should allow you (!) and just (!) you to pick the breakaway in the next race. Maybe you can email him during the race or maybe you can post your selection on the forum for all to see, like Gkam did, so that you, too (!) can get to experience the thrill G and Billy and Ray did, knowing you put the entire breakaway on your squad! Yippee! Big Grin

    You see, you don't get the points just because others did, you have to (!) be willing to do what they did, 'cheat'! Big Grin Wink

  • Cyclist killed by tipper lorry in Central London - day after protesters call for improved safety1 year 7 weeks agoComments across the press in

    Comments across the press in general are often closed if there is a possibility of a criminal prosecution.

    The driver has now been arrested and is in custody. Speculation on the specifics of the case would not be helpful.

  • Cycle helmets have "major flaws" in safety, insists cyclist airbag firm Hövding (+ video)1 year 7 weeks agoCyclingscience: The title of

    Cyclingscience:

    The title of that paper, "Bicycle helmets are highly effective at preventing head injury" is more than a little misleading. Nowhere do they actually evaluate the effect on head injuries, rather they are evaluating the change in acceleration on head-form drops, and extra-polating that to what they think the effect might be on head injuries.

    A better title would be "Helmets are effective at reducing acceleration to the head, under the laboratory conditions regulations require helmets to be effective in". This isn't really new, we already knew these helmets do that. Note that, just as Hövding say, the accelerations they observed, 181g +, are still extremely high. You would not want be to exposed to these impacts, with or without helmet.

    The thing is that in the real-world, in population-wide studies, we do simply do not see anywhere near the same level of benefits of helmets. If the study you cite were correct in its title claim, there's no way the dutch (with their very low helmet usage rates) should be getting better safety than in the UK/USA - despite the slightly generally more unsafe conditions in the latter two countries. There's simply no way that injury rates amongst several groups in AU and NZ could have gone up /after/ the introduction of the helmet law, if they had such amazing real-world safety benefits.

    Controlled laboratory conditions with impacts and measurements that are /idealised/ to what helmets can do simply don't translate well to the real-world - real-world data seems to be very clear on that.

    I have links to studies and figures in my blog, and in comments to it, at: http://paul.jakma.org/2011/10/28/the-case-against-bicycle-helmets-quick-...

  • Cycle helmets have "major flaws" in safety, insists cyclist airbag firm Hövding (+ video)1 year 7 weeks agocycling science - the book

    cycling science - the book wrote:
    So, do we believe a commercial company or do we believe research scientists? Only last week scientists published research confirming 100% the efficacy of helmets.
    It's likely that Hövding hasn't seen the most recent paper, published online in the peer-reviewed journal Accident Analysis & Injury Prevention, starkly titled "Bicycle helmets are highly effective at preventing head injury during head impact: Head-form accelerations and injury criteria for helmeted and unhelmeted impacts".
    The paper is by people who work in engineering, orthopaedics and biomechanics and who don't appear to have a vested interest in airbags.
    They conclude that helmets reduced peak accelerations in all impacts, helmets reduced head injury criteria in all impacts and, overall, helmets reduced risk of injury.

    We have known for years that this sort of study shows that helmets ought to reduce head injuries and deaths.

    We also know that the real life "experiments" in making cyclists wear helmets have failed to reduce the rate of head injuries and deaths in every country where mandatory helmet laws have been tried.

    Here is one example.

    http://rdrf.org.uk/2013/12/17/the-effects-of-new-zealands-cycle-helmet-law/

    It would be more useful to look into the disparty between theory and practice, in order to find out why mass helmet wearing does not have the expected result.

    To carry on doing this sort of study will not tell us anything about why some countries have failed to reduce their very high cyclist casualty rates by forcing cyclists to wear helmets.

  • FORUM'S SCORUM's MINI LEAGUE 2014(Spring Classics and Pre-Giro tours)1 year 7 weeks agoYeah, nice one Ray, love the

    Yeah, nice one Ray, love the detailed updates. And top 10! With a totally unjustified amount of confidence for the weekend...

  • Deep Breath Everyone1 year 7 weeks agoNice try backflip with the

    Nice try backflip with the "Deep breath everyone" post! Unfortunately some people have followed their deep breath with a mass exhalation of guff (none of which I have been able to bring myself to read).

    I may have never used the word "guff" before in a sentence. Ho hum.

    Lets get racing again people!

  • FORUM'S SCORUM's MINI LEAGUE 2014(Spring Classics and Pre-Giro tours)1 year 7 weeks agoThanks Ray just FYI naffets

    Thanks Ray just FYI naffets appears twice with 31 and 29 points.

  • Cycle helmets have "major flaws" in safety, insists cyclist airbag firm Hövding (+ video)1 year 7 weeks agoBeaufort wrote:These look to

    Beaufort wrote:
    These look to be excellent. How many of you that drive cars would buy one without airbags ? If it saved my life I'd be happy to spend the necessary wedge on one.

    [[[[[ I feel there's an enormous "if" there, for 300 smackers!
    P.R.

  • Womens World Cup1 year 7 weeks agoI went for the tactic of 4

    I went for the tactic of 4 big names, the best of the 8-12 credit riders and 4 cheapsters. Feel like the cream will rise to the top in the Ronde...

  • Cycle helmets have "major flaws" in safety, insists cyclist airbag firm Hövding (+ video)1 year 7 weeks agojasonbrim wrote:Not sure this

    jasonbrim wrote:
    Not sure this will get me wearing one soon, and some tests on more expensive helmets would have been useful, seeing as a Hövding costs more than top-of-the-range helmets.
    I also know my helmet protects me when I need it and know it won't deploy randomly if I have a fall where it's not needed.

    Once the pros start wearing them though, then it might be a different story Laughing


    [[[[[ Seems like wearing some sort of horse-collar round yer neck...in warm weather, nice and sweaty? (Pass).
    P.R.

  • Just In: Sublime Six C Aero1 year 7 weeks agoWho put that rear wheel in,

    Who put that rear wheel in, the quick release in on the wrong side

    Nice to see another Campag bike out there though

  • Cycle helmets have "major flaws" in safety, insists cyclist airbag firm Hövding (+ video)1 year 7 weeks agocycling science - the book

    cycling science - the book wrote:
    So, do we believe a commercial company or do we believe research scientists? Only last week scientists published research confirming 100% the efficacy of helmets.
    It's likely that Hövding hasn't seen the most recent paper, published online in the peer-reviewed journal Accident Analysis & Injury Prevention, starkly titled "Bicycle helmets are highly effective at preventing head injury during head impact: Head-form accelerations and injury criteria for helmeted and unhelmeted impacts".
    The paper is by people who work in engineering, orthopaedics and biomechanics and who don't appear to have a vested interest in airbags.
    They conclude that helmets reduced peak accelerations in all impacts, helmets reduced head injury criteria in all impacts and, overall, helmets reduced risk of injury.
    If anyone has contact with Hövding, tell them they can read it at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000145751400061X

    It looks like the numbers (HIC values etc) in this paper are similar to the ones Hövding quote in their video for 'normal' helmets, so they aren't saying that normal helmets don't work at all, they are saying theirs works much better. And let's face it, if you do hit your head you would rather be wearing a helmet than nothing, and at the point your face is heading to the tarmac you'd rather it was a massive puffed-up airbag than a little piece of EPS.

    Of course this is just more food for the helmet compulsion lobby which can't get past the notion that making everyone wear helmets would save some number of lives a year, to the likelihood that less people would cycle leading to more deaths by loss of 'critical mass of cyclists numbers', more deaths via obesity, heart disease, more congestion, more pollution (more deaths) and so on....

    The ideal answer still remains to reduce accidents

  • Londoner to take on Spring Classics routes - on a penny-farthing1 year 7 weeks agoMuch kudos to him. Great

    Much kudos to him. Great proof it is about the rider and not the bike! Applause

  • Deep Breath Everyone1 year 7 weeks agokeyboard warriors! Jeez you'd

    keyboard warriors!

    Jeez you'd think people would have better things to do than moan about something so trivial.

    I missed the opportunity, so what. The most it would have cost someone is A dhb Glitch long sleeve jersey.....

  • Cyclist killed by tipper lorry in Central London - day after protesters call for improved safety1 year 7 weeks agonotfastenough wrote:Not

    notfastenough wrote:
    Not again. So sad and, in all likelihood, so avoidable.

    Of course it is, tfl seem to know this is a great way at "smoothing the "traffic" flow?".

    legalised manslaughter / murder? they've probably been asking the "police" for advice?

  • Ordnance Survey launches free iOS Ride Tour de France route app with Chris Boardman1 year 7 weeks agoIt's not quite that cut and

    It's not quite that cut and dried, the demographic for road cycling and, specifically, wanting an app for tour stages, is not the same as the overall split for smartphones. but most people would expect an app developer to release an android version these days

  • Damaged Braking Surface.1 year 7 weeks agoThe metal bits in the brake

    The metal bits in the brake pads could have been there before but weren't noticed. It is not uncommon to find these in old pads, especially when used with less expensive wheels.

    Perhaps your scouring is from the pads, in which case new pads will prevent future wear. As for fixing the braking surface, if it were me I would let it be with the new pads for a while and see how it goes once the new pads and braking surface work in a bit. The scouring shouldn't get worse doing this, while a poor attempt at repairing could.

    The new pads may sound a bit rough on the first ride or two, but that will pass.

  • Deep Breath Everyone1 year 7 weeks agochiv30 wrote:Actually... I...

    chiv30 wrote:
    Actually... I... found it quite pleasant and... light hearted...

    Thank you!

  • Ordnance Survey launches free iOS Ride Tour de France route app with Chris Boardman1 year 7 weeks agoMobile OS market

    Mobile OS market share:

    Android 78.9%
    iOS 15.5%
    Microsoft 3.6%

    Source

    Ordnance Survey just p*ssed off four fifths of cyclists.

  • Deep Breath Everyone1 year 7 weeks agonorthstar wrote:Which is not

    northstar wrote:
    Which is not addressing the problem at all, when is the cheating going to reversed?.

    I think you should take it straight up to Brian Cookson and the UCI if the matter continues unresolved to your satisfaction Waiting

  • Deep Breath Everyone1 year 7 weeks agonorthstar wrote:When is the

    northstar wrote:
    When is the "cheating" going to be reversed?

  • Deep Breath Everyone1 year 7 weeks agodave Atkinson wrote:northstar

    dave Atkinson wrote:
    northstar wrote:

    Which is not addressing the problem at all, when is the cheating going to reversed?.

    i refer you to my reply in the first thread, again. also to the terms and conditions of the game, and specifically this bit:

    Quote:
    Farrelly Atkinson will take reasonable precautions to ensure that the game functions correctly at all times

    Dave i hate to put a damper on your legal jargon but the very quote above indicates that the company in question made reasonable precautions ....so playing devils advocate here.

    For the benefit of the complainant could you outline what "reasonable precautions" said company took to ensure the clock change wouldn't have an adverse effect on the game play the following morning?

    Devil

    As I said just devils advocate so putting that out there ( no I don't want my tenner I'm enjoying the game and the banter)