Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

forum

Drivers and their problems

A new catch-all Tea Shop thread for those miscellaneous new stories that don't quite fit with parking, crashing into buildings or trapped/prisoners in their homes. 

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

3295 comments

Avatar
Steve K replied to David9694 | 4 weeks ago
0 likes
David9694 wrote:

Then you'll know the distance from Eling village to the centre of Totton is less than a mile, but drivers will die on that hill. 

And, more seriously, where's the coverage of the closure of the cycle lane which forces you to cycle on the Totton bypass.

Avatar
stonojnr replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
0 likes

Sudbury has more going for it than Hadleigh but the local Sudbury councillors demanded a vote of no confidence as a result of the "shameful" decision.

https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/24244100.sudbury-councillors-brand-parking-c...

Avatar
David9694 replied to Steve K | 4 weeks ago
1 like

Ooo, yikes!

Avatar
brooksby replied to stonojnr | 1 month ago
4 likes

stonojnr wrote:

Sudbury has more going for it than Hadleigh but the local Sudbury councillors demanded a vote of no confidence as a result of the "shameful" decision. https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/24244100.sudbury-councillors-brand-parking-c...

It's funny how on the one hand it's all a war on the hard-working motorist while the bl00dy cyclists unfairly receive all that taxpayers' money (really?) and yet on the other hand the motorists still insist on free or insanely cheap parking for their vehicles… 

Avatar
David9694 replied to stonojnr | 1 month ago
3 likes

stonojnr wrote:

Sudbury has more going for it than Hadleigh but the local Sudbury councillors demanded a vote of no confidence as a result of the "shameful" decision. https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/24244100.sudbury-councillors-brand-parking-c...

Ah yes, spoken from the delicious position of The Sidelines and not having to put your hand in your own pocket to continue to subsidise drivers. 

Avatar
stonojnr replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
3 likes

Its the story that just keeps giving, the councillor who has submitted the request to call in the decision and wants 1 hr free car parking is from the Green party!!!

https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/24247158.sudbury-hadleigh-lavenham-parking-c...

Avatar
David9694 replied to stonojnr | 1 month ago
2 likes

stonojnr wrote:

Its the story that just keeps giving, the councillor who has submitted the request to call in the decision and wants 1 hr free car parking is from the Green party!!! https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/24247158.sudbury-hadleigh-lavenham-parking-c...

I like that financial grounds are "narrow". 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to OnYerBike | 1 month ago
0 likes

Not heard of that expression but have read some of the detail before in a different context. Does seem to relate to another person rather than a company and I thought the same as HP that the normal operation of Tier is to leave the bikes on public property, so I don't think there would be a duty of care beyond making sure there was no obstruction of the highway.

Avatar
David9694 replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
3 likes

David9694 wrote:

You and a friend have won first prize, a day out at Diddly Squat Farm. 

And then you say, "what's the second prize?"

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Hirsute | 1 month ago
1 like

Actually as the article says people have arrived to hire the scooter, he should hire them for 1 minute and leave them in public space!

Avatar
brooksby replied to Hirsute | 1 month ago
1 like

Don't TIER scooters have a geofenced area where you must leave them?  In which case, they might have ended up fining him for leaving them outside the area marked for leaving them.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
1 like
Avatar
brooksby replied to Hirsute | 1 month ago
2 likes

Hirsute wrote:

Definitely in it

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1EOMwwJ0WEDfXDSIn9tq8bWNlsg...

Oh fair enough - I'd thought that the parking areas were drawn a lot tighter than that.

Avatar
David9694 replied to ktache | 1 month ago
3 likes

ktache wrote:

Why would tyre extinguishers need their weights set to zero?

it's their human rite

Avatar
perce replied to Hirsute | 1 month ago
6 likes

I really don't understand how drivers can hit this tree stump - it's on the pavement, it's not like it's in the middle of the road.

Avatar
wtjs replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
3 likes

You have to feel sorry for this poor driver

Only to a degree! He shoud have had the sense to come to Lancashire where all this petty bureaucracy of number plates, VED, MOT etc. has long since been abandoned

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
2 likes
brooksby wrote:

Not exactly 'drivers' problems', but I'll leave this here:

Businessman accused of 'holding e-bikes to ransom' after TIER left them at his storage firm by mistake

TIER didn't come and pick up five bikes left at Stewart Burrough's self-storage business, so he started charging them for the storage. TIER responded by calling the police

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/businessman-accused-hold...

I saw that and had mixed opinions about it as TIER aren't the best run business around, but the bloke had no right to move the bikes into his storage container and then try charging them for storage.

I think he should have informed the police/council about TIER fly tipping e-waste instead.

Avatar
David9694 replied to wtjs | 1 month ago
6 likes

Good to see the person in yellow apologising to the driver for having caused this.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to perce | 1 month ago
10 likes

perce wrote:

I really don't understand how drivers can hit this tree stump - it's on the pavement, it's not like it's in the middle of the road.

Stump wasn't wearing hi-vis - clad in dark low-contrast bark.
Stump wobbled and suddenly fell in front of the car.
Stump wasn't wearing a helmet ("is this right, counsel?")
Stump unexpectedly appeared where no careful, competent driver would expect it (on pavement)
Driver was distracted by having to avoid a stump on the opposite pavement.
"Exceptional" weather conditions prevented the driver from seeing the stump (dark due to night, overcast, spot of rain)
Sun was in the driver's eyes.
Driver said they had looked several times but "simply failed to see it".

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to wtjs | 1 month ago
0 likes

Assuming you're referring to the tractor, I believe there are slightly different requirements for agricultural vehicles with limited use on public roads. Can't say for sure whether this tractor is compliant, but equally not confident it isn't.

Avatar
wtjs replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
3 likes

Good to see the person in yellow apologising to the driver for having caused this

No, he's Praising the Lord for saving him from being killed! Fire and Rescue turned up a couple of hours later to knock down the teetering walls, and the council has done a good job of shoring up the remainder. This could all have been much worse- there's a lot of pedestrian traffic coming and going to the river off left, and vehicle traffic parking.

Avatar
David9694 replied to chrisonabike | 1 month ago
3 likes

Driver has no recollection of hitting the stump.

Avatar
wtjs replied to OnYerBike | 1 month ago
1 like

OK- let's try Lancashire Audis, then. This is as good as No Plate

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
4 likes
David9694 wrote:

Driver has no recollection of hitting the stump.

Stump was hard to pick out against the copse in the background.

Avatar
David9694 replied to chrisonabike | 1 month ago
4 likes

Car aquaplaned and hit the stump. 

It was 5 seconds of madness. 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to chrisonabike | 1 month ago
5 likes

Dear Insurer re damage to front bumper

" I drove on the wrong pavement and hit a tree stump that should not have been there ".

Avatar
wtjs replied to OnYerBike | 1 month ago
0 likes

Or this

Avatar
David9694 replied to OnYerBike | 1 month ago
0 likes

How many licence plates do you need on a tractor? 

According to the small print in the regs, you need to have one on both sides at the front of the tractor, as well as at the back of the cab. However, almost all tractors just have a rear one, which suggests that there is something of gap out there between theory and practice.

https://www.fwi.co.uk/machinery/5-point-q-a-to-help-you-with-licence-pla...

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to David9694 | 1 month ago
0 likes

Far from an expert, but a brief google suggests to me that the article you have linked is wrong - tractors need plates on both sides or on the rear of the vehicle (or rear of trailer, if towing a trailer).

There's an extensive thread here (which actually links to the same FWI article as you): https://forum.cyclinguk.org/viewtopic.php?t=152006

AFAIK the current relevant legistlation is https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2001/561/regulation/8/made

Avatar
wtjs replied to Hirsute | 1 month ago
5 likes

You'd think the residents would be keen to retain the stump as protection against the 'Sudden Unexplained Car in the Front Room' incident shown on the 'Drivers in Your House' topic- if a Honda driver can do that, just imagine how far through the house a BMW or Audi could get!

Pages

Latest Comments